supreme court declared something to be constitutional does not make it so is simply inaccurate. in fact, when a couple of people on the supreme court declare something to be constitutional it is, in fact, constitutional t is how our government operates. it is part of what has been, yoç know, obviously distressing for folks on the left, progressives, looked at decisions they have been unhappy with from the court coming out, whether the immigration decisions on monday or whether it was about citizens united. the but the fact is once they are determined constitution a.m., only the supreme court can make them doesn t make them good or bad policy but it does, in fact, make them constitutional. rand paul was wrong. by the way, you get rand paul on and put him on ask him where he stood on the 64 civil rights bill, would you that have passed constitutional review by his lights? ask him where he stood on the brown case? was there inherent problem in the constitution, separate but equal.
accident know it was an adversarial event? just crazy? called straight reporting by david gregory, right down the middle. david gregory never been accused of having a partisan bone in his party. he asked him to explain how he could be let s start on this issue. he asked him if he support the republican plan on medicare, the guy doesn t support t this isn t tricky questioning. no, not tricky questioning at all. and as howard said, david gregory play it is down the middle. look, you started with the question what is going on in newt s head that is never the question, it is what is going on in newt s mouth or what s coming out of newt s mouth? it s minute to minute almost. remember about the military action in libya? he was against it he was for it he was against it again and, yoç know, it s that s the way he is. it s as if he is at some sort of very lively faculty club