idea this is not being simply a politicized attack on the democrats obama and clinton. how are they not a highly political group and why are they suddenly eligible for the tax exemption. much of the tea party efforts stem from direct mail efforts. that could be why they said do you have tea party or patriotic in the title. just comes too close to the nerve of political intimidation and cannot be tolerated. chris: one more thing that is striking about this. the irs did not official aannounce this. the president of the united states did not officially apologize. the treasury secretary did not officially apologize. it came out because a mid level manager the person at the irs in charge of reviewing the tax exempt organizations was having a q&a session with a bunch of tax lawyers. they he asked a question and she answered the question. that is how the whole story came out and perhaps not so
idea this is not being simply a politicized attack on the democrats obama and clinton. how are they not a highly political group and why are they suddenly eligible for the tax exemption. much of the tea party efforts stem from direct mail efforts. that could be why they said do you have tea party or patriotic in the title. just comes too close to the nerve of political intimidation and cannot be tolerated. chris: one more thing that is striking about this. the irs did not official aannounce this. the president of the united states did not officially apologize. the treasury secretary did not officially apologize. it came out because a mid level manager the person at the irs in charge of reviewing the tax exempt organizations was having a q&a session with a bunch of tax lawyers. they he asked a question and she answered the question. that is how the whole story came out and perhaps not so
idea this is not being simply a politicized attack on the democrats obama and clinton. how are they not a highly political group and why are they suddenly eligible for the tax exemption. much of the tea party efforts stem from direct mail efforts. that could be why they said do you have tea party or patriotic in the title. just comes too close to the nerve of political intimidation and cannot be tolerated. chris: one more thing that is striking about this. the irs did not official aannounce this. the president of the united states did not officially apologize. the treasury secretary did not officially apologize. it came out because a mid level manager the person at the irs in charge of reviewing the tax exempt organizations was having a q&a session with a bunch of tax lawyers. they he asked a question and she answered the question. that is how the whole story came out and perhaps not so
ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take viagra if you take nitrates for chest pain; it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. side effects include headache, flushing, upset stomach, and abnormal vision. to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than four hours. stop taking viagra and call your doctor right away if you experience a sudden decrease or loss in vision or hearing. this is the age of taking action. viagra. talk to your doctor. see if america s most prescribed ed treatment is right for you. we are a government of laws, not of men. those are the words of associate justice to the supreme court, antonin scalia. scalia said that and a whole lot more during a headline grabbing appearance at princeton university that included a q&a session with students.
we are a government of laws, not of men. those are the words of associate justice to the supreme court, antonin scalia. scalia said that and a whole lot more during a headline grabbing appearance at princeton university that included a q&a session with students. it was then scalia was asked about his past writings on gay rights, including a 2003 case, lawrence versus texas which likened sodomy to among other incomparables, bestiality and incest. in that high case the court ruled that statescan not outlaw sodomy among consenting adults of the same sex. disagreeing, scalia wrote in part, texas prohibition of sodomy is unsupported by a rational relation to a legislate state interest nor denies the equal protection of the laws. emphasis added. i dissent.