Page 12 - இல்லினாய்ஸ் நிலை துப்பாக்கி சங்கம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Mandatory Fingerprinting, Universal Background Checks Wrapped Into Package To Fix FOID Card Backlog
tspr.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from tspr.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Mandatory Fingerprinting, Universal Background Checks Wrapped Into Package To Fix FOID Card Backlog
wglt.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from wglt.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Brian Rich/Sun-Times file
SPRINGFIELD Dueling gun control bills are heading for a showdown on the floor of the state Legislature.
One would require potential gun owners to be fingerprinted to obtain a Firearm Owner Identification Card, entail more frequent renewal of the card and mandate background checks for the private sale of firearms.
The other bill is designed to lessen the strain on gun owners and the Illinois State Police by automatically renewing and digitizing FOID cards in Illinois. It has the backing of the police agency, which issues the cards and handles background checks for gun purchases.
Both bills seek to reform and improve the FOID card, which Illinois residents must have to legally own firearms or ammunition. But each side accuses the other of missing the target.
Illinois State Police Give 150 Day Extension On FOID/CCL Cards
97zokonline.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from 97zokonline.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
The ISRA is neutral on a gun bill?
If you are paying dues to this outfit, you’re a sucker.
Director Kelly: =We don’t do negotiate. That’s what these these folks do. And I’ll leave it in their capable hands. We will talk to anybody on any issue, whatever the perspective is, as it relates to information from the police=
I actually like this statement. It suggests Director Kelly is knowledgeable of both bills, and knows that the Legislature will do what the Legislature will do. The Director seems to be rising above politics by providing perspective on both bills, rather than playing politics. Am I reading this correctly?