Page 10 - இல்லினாய்ஸ் பயோமெட்ரிக் தகவல் ப்ரைவஸீ நாடகம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Biggest Illinois Decisions So Far In 2021
law360.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from law360.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Sonic surveillance: why you don t want AI snooping on you
accessnow.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from accessnow.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Advertisement
Nothing to Supersize Here: McDonald’s Moves for Dismissal of Drive-Thru Data Privacy Litigation on Basis “Training Data” Not Regulated Under BIPA Tuesday, June 29, 2021
Carpenter v. McDonald’s Corporation, Case No. 1:21-cv-02906 (N.D. Ill.).
The crux of Plaintiff’s Complaint is that “McDonald’s AI voice assistant’s voice recognition technology collects customers’ voiceprint biometrics in order to be able to correctly interpret customer orders and to identify repeat customers to provide a tailored experience.” However, “McDonald’s has failed to comply with BIPA’s regulations and does not notify its customers that when they interact with McDonald’s AI voice assistant their voiceprint biometric information is used and collected, nor does McDonald’s obtain their consent to do so.” Compl. ¶¶ 8-9.
US Supreme Court Majority Rules No Harm, No Foul in TransUnion LLC v Ramirez | Morgan Lewis
jdsupra.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from jdsupra.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Wednesday, June 23, 2021
Data privacy litigators have their eye on the Supreme Court going into the end of the month as we wait for the Court’s opinion in
Ramirez v. TransUnion. And when the decision is issued, CPW will be there in real time to fill you in. In the meantime, below is a refresher of the facts and issues raised in
Ramirez, and why it is a must-watch decision for the end of the Supreme Court’s current term.
As readers of CPW already know, Article III limits federal court jurisdiction to actual “cases or controversies.” U.S. Const. Art. III, § 2. The Supreme Court has held that standing “is an essential and unchanging part of the case-or-controversy requirement of Article III.” This includes the following three elements, which constitute the “irreducible constitutional minimum of standing”: