The United States Supreme Court isn t merely one of America s most important institutions, it is also one of the most important elements of our constitutional system of checks and balances, not to mention the gold standard of judicial independence and integrity on the planet. Despite its judicial and governmental prowess, Democrats more aptly radical Marxists have made clear their intention to politicize and co-opt the Supreme Court for their own selfish political gain through a strategy known as court packing.
Democrats current attempts to abuse the Court are by no means the first of their kind. In fact, Democrat President Franklin Delano Roosevelt raised the specter of increasing the number of Supreme Court Justices nearly 100 years ago in an attempt to appoint a majority of justices who would approve his unconstitutional New Deal programs. Yet even his own Democratic Party, which controlled both chambers of Congress, rejected the idea. The Senate Judiciary Committee, at t
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
Following the death of George Floyd during his arrest in Minneapolis, Minnesota, America experienced months of civil unrest throughout the country. It was during these protests that some began to assert that civil society in America was beyond repair and advocated for breaking the shackles of an allegedly oppressive and racially insensitive government. It was from this belief that the idea of establishing autonomous zones free from civil authority and independent from the United States was born. For the first time since 1861, calls for secession were acted upon, and protestors began to commandeer and blockade neighborhoods in major U.S. cities, thereby creating bubbles of autonomous rule within the United States. Protestors denied emergency responders and civil authorities entry to these autonomous zones, and prevented property owners from quietly enjoying their homes and businesses. For days, or even weeks, local and stat
Respondents in Dacera case not informed of their rights lawyer By NICOLE-ANNE C. LAGRIMAS, GMA News
Published January 14, 2021 11:07am Some of the respondents in the Christine Dacera case were not informed of their rights to a lawyer and to remain silent when they were brought in for police questioning, their lawyer said Thursday. JP Dela Serna and Rommel Galido, two of the three who were detained by Makati City police, said they were not read their Miranda rights, according to their lawyer Abby Portugal. “They were not informed of their rights,” Portugal told GMA News Online. Dela Serna, Galido, and John Paul Halili were detained by police until prosecutors ordered them released for further investigation last week.
Donald Trump, some of which seemed to clearly contradict each other.
During a Wednesday evening interview with host
Emily Maitlis of BBC’s
Newsnight, Comey made the case that the best way forward for the country was to try to minimize the extent to which the federal government focuses its energy on the now-twice impeached president.
When Maitlis asked what precedent it sets if Trump is given a pass for his misconduct just because his term is ending, Comey wound his way through a response of byzantine logic.
“If the appearance of fairness matters, if we arrest drug dealers and shopkeepers, why wouldn’t you extend that same sense of the appearance fairness?” Maitlis pressed.