To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
This case was brought on behalf of a class of 72 female sales professionals employed by clothing retailer John Varvatos Enterprises, Inc. (Varvatos), alleging that Varvatos’s clothing allowance policy, which included giving free clothing to male sales professionals but not female sales professionals, violated various federal and state anti-discrimination laws.
Knox v. John Varvatos Enterprises Inc., No. 17 CIV. 772 (GWG), 2021 WL 95914, at 1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2021).
The case went to trial, and the jury found for the plaintiffs on all counts, awarded the compensatory damages sought by the plaintiffs, and awarded punitive damages. The court entered judgment in the amount of $3,516,051.23.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
This case was brought on behalf of a class of 72 female sales
professionals employed by clothing retailer John Varvatos
Enterprises, Inc. (Varvatos), alleging that Varvatos s clothing
allowance policy, which included giving free clothing to male sales
professionals but not female sales professionals, violated various
federal and state anti-discrimination laws.
Knox v. John
Varvatos Enterprises Inc., No. 17 CIV. 772 (GWG), 2021 WL
95914, at 1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2021).
The case went to trial, and the jury found for the plaintiffs on
all counts, awarded the compensatory damages sought by the