தேசிய குற்றங்கள் பதிவுகள் பணியகம் News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
In the pandemic, more Indian children are falling victim to online grooming for sexual exploitation
scroll.in - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from scroll.in Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Assam Records Highest Rate Of Crime Against Women For 4th Year
sentinelassam.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from sentinelassam.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Indian faces were run through facial recognition tech tools Here s why you should be concerned
scroll.in - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from scroll.in Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Human trafficking remains a significant problem: young girls pay the highest price
indiatimes.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from indiatimes.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Karan Thapar | Sedition: Time for SC to enforce its own rulings
Published Jun 11, 2021, 12:11 am IST
Updated Jun 11, 2021, 12:11 am IST
96 per cent of sedition cases for criticising politicians and governments over the last decade were registered after 2014
What we need is meticulous and unfailing enforcement of what the court had laid down as the law of sedition, and not a fresh definition. Perhaps that’s what Justice Chandrachud meant, but it’s not what he said. (Photo:PTI)
“It is time to define the limits of sedition”, said Justice D.Y. Chandrachud of the Supreme Court on June 1, and his comment was received with considerable applause. I’m afraid it left me puzzled. The Supreme Court did that nearly 60 years ago in the 1962 Kedar Nath Singh case. What we need is meticulous and unfailing enforcement of what the court had laid down as the law of sedition, and not a fresh definition. Perhaps that’s what Justice Chandrachud meant, but it’s not what he said.