Competition Jurisprudence In India livelaw.in - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from livelaw.in Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Porsche Owner Files Federal Class Action Lawsuit Following Stop Sale Order Highlighting A New Round Of Vehicle Emissions Concerns
News provided by
Share this article
Share this article
PHILADELPHIA, March 10, 2021 /PRNewswire/ Tens of thousands of duped Porsche car and SUV owners in Pennsylvania and across the U.S., who are now blocked from selling their non-compliant, excessively polluting, high-performance models due to a highly unusual, November 2020 manufacturer stop sale order , may be eligible for compensation as a result of a federal class action lawsuit filed against Porsche.
The filing (
Bruce C. Turner v. Porsche North America et al., United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Illiquid stock options matter: Five entities settle cases with Sebi business-standard.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from business-standard.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Jacobs | Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads
PHILADELPHIA – A six-figure financial dispute between collectors of rare “Magic: The Gathering” playing cards that is centered on fraud accusations will soon go to trial in a Philadelphia federal court.
Michael Ruggiero of Morganville, N.J., first filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on July 20, 2018, versus Brian Nocenti of Kennett Square and a John Doe, alleging that they breached their duty of good faith and fair dealings.
Ruggiero argued that on May 29, 2018, he suffered from significant financial loss and the loss of irreplaceable collection of “Magic: The Gathering” playing cards, as a result of the wrongful conduct of the defendant.
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
To sue in federal court, a plaintiff must allege an injury that the court can actually remedy, rather than just issuing an advisory opinion, and a connection between the defendant’s conduct and the actual injury. See First-Year Law School 101. This principle, known as standing, essentially means that a plaintiff has to have an actual and imminent, not theoretical, injury.
Does the fact that a data breach exposed someone’s personal identifiable information (“PII”), without proof that the exposed PII was
misused confer standing to sue? It depends. Yes, lawyers love to say this, but in standing cases, it is true. Whether a plaintiff has standing to sue for exposure of his or her PII depends just as much on the jurisdiction in which the plaintiff files as on whether plaintiff alleges his or her data was misused.