Share This -
x
The Supreme Court has held that when parties change the venue/place of arbitration by mutual agreement, the new venue/place will become the seat of the arbitration .
Therefore, the Courts at the changed venue/place of arbitration will be having jurisdiction over the arbitral proceedings.
A bench comprising
Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman and Hrishikesh Roy gave this significant ruling in the case
M/s Inox Renewables Ltd v Jayesh Electricals Ltd. The bench followed the precedent in
BGS SGS Soma JV vs NHPC Ltd, which held that the venue of arbitration will be the juridical seat of arbitration in the absence of contrary intention of the parties.
SC dismisses Syed Waseem Rizvi’s PIL that sought deletion of certain verses from the Holy Quran Former chairperson of Shia Waqf Board of Uttar Pradesh, Rizvi had asked that certain verses of the holy book that he alleged “promote extremism” be deleted
Sabrangindia12 Apr 2021
Image Courtesy:indianexpress.com
The Supreme Court of India has dismissed the controversial public interest litigation (PIL) which sought deletion of certain verses from the Holy Quran which the petitioner Syaed Wseem, former chairperson of the Shia Waqf Board, alleged “violate the law of the land and promote extremism”. According to a report in the Bar and Bench, the case: Syed Waseem Rizvi v. Union of India, was heard by a Bench of Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman, BR Gavai and Hrishikesh Roy which not only dismissed the PIL but also imposed costs of Rs. 50,000 on the petitioner Rizvi.
SC declares instant triple talaq unconstitutional, illegal, void; says it is against basic tenets of Quran
SC declares instant triple talaq unconstitutional, illegal, void; says it is against basic tenets of Quran
The Supreme Court On Tuesday Pronounced Its Verdict On The Controversial Instant Triple Talaq Practice Terming It âunconstitutional. The Apex Court Termed The Islamic Practice Unconstitutional And In Violation Of Article 14 Of The Indian Constitution, Which Provides For Equality Before The Law.
News Nation Bureau | Edited By : Gautam Lalotra | Updated on: 23 Aug 2017, 07:43:15 AM
New Delhi:
The Supreme Court on Tuesday pronounced its verdict on the controversial instant triple talaq practice terming it “unconstitutional . The apex court termed the Islamic practice unconstitutional and in violation of Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, which provides for equality before the law.
Supreme Court strikes down ossification test at 55
New Delhi
An ossification test conducted on an accused at the age of 55 cannot be used to declare him a juvenile on the date of crime in the absence of reliable medical evidence, the SC held on Friday.
A bench of Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman, Hemant Gupta and BR Gavai expressed surprise at the ossification tests to determine the age of the person on the date of incident since such tests cannot yield trustworthy and reliable results.
It said such a test can be relevant to determine the approximate age of a person when he is around 18 years of age, but not when the person is around 40-55 years of age since the structure of bones cannot be helpful in determining the age.
NCLT can now issue directions to convene meetings of shareholders: Future Retail prokerala.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from prokerala.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.