Tuesday, January 26, 2021
Two federal cases in the Northern District of Ohio recently reached very different conclusions on whether the state’s COVID-19 shutdowns of restaurants permit valid claims for business interruption insurance coverage. Reviewing essentially the same facts and policy provisions, one court found for the insurer, holding no coverage to exist. The other found for the policyholder, awarding coverage. The opposite results will no doubt lead to further upcoming appellate activity in Ohio. The reasoning in these cases may also lead to further clarifications in Ohio about the rules for interpreting insurance policies.
A.
1:20-CV-01192
In
Santo’s case, Judge Pamela Barker dismissed the policyholder’s claims for business interruption coverage on two main grounds. First, the court found: (a) Santo’s failed to plead a threshold claim of “direct physical loss of or damage to” its insured premises, given the absence of any alleged “tangible
Underwriters At Lloyds London,
Woodward Design and Build LLC and
Zurich American Insurance Company: Directive Of The Clerk Regarding Compliance With 28:1447(b)re: 1 Notice Of Removal, Filed By Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Albert L Bossier, Jr, Lamorak Insurance Company. By The Clerk. (bm)
Weekly Newsletter
Sign up ×
By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from Louisiana Record. You can unsubscribe at any time. Protected by Google ReCAPTCHA. Order Of Recusal. Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon Recused. Case Reassigned To Judge Wendy B Vitter. Signed By Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon On 12/31/2020.(ko)
Case number 2:20-cv-03470-WBV-DPC was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.