Latest Breaking News On - ஸ்பிரிண்ட் தகவல்தொடர்புகள் - Page 1 : vimarsana.com

Ed MorrisseyPosted at 1:03 pm on March 8, 2021 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter That gasp heard after this ruling dropped comes from every college and university with a “free speech zone” and policies that impose heckler’s vetoes. Plaintiffs suing over restrictions on speech and religious expression on campus only need to establish “nominal damages” to gain standing, the Supreme Court ruled in an 8-1 decision, not necessarily actual damages. That opens up a vast new field of litigation that attorneys all across the country will rush to meet. The 8-1 ruling in  Uzuegbunam v Preczewski from Justice Clarence Thomas does not actually settle the case in favor of the students, but the writing is on the wall for Georgia Gwinnett College:

United statesUzuegbunamv preczewskiKate andersonJustice john robertsJustice clarence thomasCatholic churchDistrict courtAmerican humanist associationAlliance defending freedomSprint communications coSupreme courtGeorgia gwinnett collegeServices incSpokeo incChief justice john robertsSprint communications