Appearance best. That is, more contrasting or softer, more discreet, start with the color scheme, lets say you have chosen what you have you are blonde with blue eyes, blue suits you, beige, most likely you can add gray, probably, yes you can gray, naturally , yes the color is blue, and accordingly choose some basic things in this palette, it suits someone the length , what will it be skirts, trousers can also be, of course, trousers, vests, in fact, there may be some elements, for example, a more classic top, and if you want to express fashion trends, that is, you can use classic ones what are they, blouses, shirts, i think a white shirt , a classic white shirt should definitely be in the wardrobe, here is a classic white shirt today, this shirt is still oversized or a shirt that fits . I dont think, that in size, for some reason, yes it seems to me, when the head is the right size, somehow it looks already, fashionable, all the people ask me, well, that is, a shirt, if its a girl, she can take the shirt off her husband, well, maybe , look, it depends on the size of the husband, on the size of the husband, but i dont even know, it seems to me that now they make excellent cuts for womens cuts, i generally buy shirts in mens stores, yes, its great here, but it seems to me they fit best for men, maybe i dont wear white shirts, so i would argue with milana, not everyone, it seems to me that they dont suit everyone. Here you are, both representatives of a contrasting appearance, i think its good for you, but blue shirts, blue is great for me, i wear blue , i have all the shades, yes, really, thats why you need to choose initially, but black, black, at one time i didnt like it at all i wore it, i avoided it, but lately, since i work a lot in the theater, in the theater all the directors come out to the premiere in black, for some time i was the black sheep , that is, all the directors came out in black, and they were the only one in blue or in beige. Then i i realized that it would still be more stylish and more harmonious if i also had black color, so i started using it too, it turns out that i really love black color, well, black color can also be used, but in this style preppe or is it more like this, i think, these are light colors, i think that in such a consistent preppe style there is no black color, by the way, olga and i also agreed long ago that we use black color in films to the maximum, only in. At a minimum, sorry because it doesnt look very good on on a camera, especially on a digital camera, on television its the same thing, we minimize, but black, i didnt know that, but because it falls through and you cant see the texture, in fact it turns out just a dark spot, yeah, if it s black, then it has texture indeed, that is , it is either leather or suede, or lace, or velvet, then it looks interesting, we are very glad to see you in black, yes, we are like professionals. Dressed in black and talked about it in disagreement, in general i agree that black is probably not the most advantageous color for me it seems more and some kind of beige, its brown, well, this is the style, schools, this is the style, as it seems to me , there is some kind of lawn in front of an American University and here we see people there in this idyllic picture, no one in black they wont, everyone will be some kind of restrained , noble shades of old money, and what they are now. From every iron this is a trend for old money, i really like it when people who have never had money teach other people who have also never had money, but studying looks like theyre in the seventh generation there, no, just a word, im very associated with some kind of london, Something Like that harvard, beautiful, some dark green ones like that such, yes, dark green, by the way, yes this. This is so, it happened precisely from these. Yes, this is also all from there, yes, but its beautiful, it seems to me that this is very, very true, the style originated initially, well, it is believed that it originated in america, but we know that the americans, they always wanted to look like look, europeans, who have a generation of aristocracy, they always wanted, so this style, like an imitation, yes, it originated there, well, im already looking forward to it, i want to watch the film, im very interested, yes, come watch our film, which its called, im taking a step, on september 7 it will be released nationwide in all cinemas of our beautiful country, thank you very much, we will wait impatiently, although no, the film is already showing in cinemas, it is already running, you can already go to the cinema, run already, lets go to the cinema, okay of course, we will be inspired by style. And im sure that we can learn a lot of interesting things from your images, yes , yes, thank you, thank you, this podcast is a must read, im aglyana baatnikova, my guest today. Natalia ushey, musician, soloist group melnitsa, and we discuss the argentine writer jorge luis borgis, and his image of the world as in libraries. Natasha, hello, hello, uh, please tell me, somehow khilavisa, the melnitsa group, shes probably associated with some kind of games, fantasies, maybe with lastelin of the rings, biowulf, sagas, then suddenly you choose the theme of borhis and it seems that this is unexpected, yes, but if you know you well, you are a candidate of philological sciences, a linguist, in general, the worlds of borhis, they conclude in imagine all possible plots, and please tell me about what you have in common with this writer , why you love him, ill tell you, yes, i ll tell you why i chose this particular writer for our meeting, you know, if i. Chose some scandinavian studies or celtology, i would speak here as a professional in this topic, i would include a lecturer, such as natalya andreevna, a professor at the department, now we will talk about registers in irish sagas, blah blah blah, well, probably this is not very interesting for a podcast about literature, so i decided that i probably want to be in this case not a specialist , not a teacher, but a professional reader, that is, this is what i personally am interested in reading, what makes me happy as. A reader in literature, especially since as you re absolutely right, i dont literature, and especially im not a spanish scholar, im a linguist, therefore, just like in all kinds of medical systems, i say, hello, im natasha, im a professional patient, today i want to be a professional reader, but borhis himself was a professional reader, he somehow emphasizes this, in his essays, that his main role is to read, and this is exactly what is close to me, because until the end of his life he is absolutely in love with the process of reading, this is very visible, even in those essays that he i read it when i was already completely blind, its very clear as far as he is concerned in general, in principle, with the very creation of the text, the relationship between text and language, since borhis was a polyglot, he is terribly interested in precisely this babylonian confusion of languages, which can be ordered in the preword hexagons of the Babylonian Library, somehow organized, or disorganized, remember, at he has an absolutely wonderful moment in one of the short stories, he remembers when the boys, when the books were closed for the night, he thought that the letters in them were scattered and mixed, he was very surprised that yes, yes, well, lets tell let the viewer know a little who borhis is, but in general terms, he is a writer who lived in argentina and wrote in spanish. Although he knew many other languages, yes, he worked somewhere from the thirties to the eighties of the 10th century, lived a very long, fruitful, great life for a writer, and despite the fact that he became blind during his life, in general, it would seem , this should have complicated his work, but no, he continued to work and created such Wonderful Worlds and images of a labyrinth or a world like a library, well , its interesting, he worked from a small form, this a person who has not written a single novel, although he was nominated many times for the nobel prize, i understand, and i understand him, because they also regularly ask me, natalya, why dont you write a rock opera, i say you know, im not my thing , large form, but not polish, this is not my topic, that is, even if i take on such a thing, i will express everything i want to say within the first two numbers, there are arias and characters, and then i will get bored, im done ill give it up because borhiss prose is so rich, every story contains some terribly fascinating plot, a detective story, even a charade puzzle, they are terribly complex , these short stories of his, here we must definitely remember the writer whom borhis extremely loved and respected, this is, of course , edgar allen paul, well, yes, then there is he largely relies on po, and also charades, yes, like the stolen letter and similar things, that is, borhis very much relies on po, but he continues this work, continues to bring this story to the absolute, like in the story about obenhakan who died in his own labyrinth, when it turns out that the killer is actually the murdered man, this one is lucky, very often in his uh, well , these charades, yes, puzzles, images are repeated, i even wanted to be with you talk about this story, the garden of forking paths, which is dedicated to a labyrinth, probably the most powerful of his stories and it is also in some way detective, because until the very last moment we do not understand for there is a murder, there is a murder and thats all time, that is, murder is not what it seems, with him this plot often goes through, that after reading this garden of forking paths, it finally worked out for me why borhis works with small forms, i realized that he himself created this labyrinth from text, that is, from short, repeating plots similar to each other, he created such a countless number , he creates a recursion, yes, he places mirrors in his labyrinth, ultimately making it endless, this is such a Beautiful Image and it is so applicable to absolutely everything , here we had a painting by Maurice Escher in our screensaver, well, its exactly the same thing, its just that escher is naturally visual, with him it happens in graphics, and with borhis it happens, heres escher, yes, hes really similar to the figurative world of borhis, thats why we there are these yes, this one, this tape, this particular mobius motif of recursion repeating. And so on. Borhis was a man of encyclopedic memory. It seems to me that i know what his secret was, just judging by the fact that he uses this labyrinth, in the labyrinth he places some kind of hooks so that he you cant get lost in this labyrinth, you know, hes scattering crumbs, hes scattering crumbs , yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, that is, he uses the classical technique of renaissance philosophy, this is a gnosiological technique, a technique of orders. Consciousness, which is called the devil mind, it was invented by such a cool thinker of english origin, raymond luliy, and he came up with just such a system, ordering knowledge, ordering memory, ordering those facts that are not contained in the trash attic of sherlock holmes, exactly like borhis in the endless labyrinth, where each person has an essay dedicated specifically to this raymond lulu, the logical one. Habits, to get straight into this matter, that is, but when, when you really suddenly begin to understand, you understand how simple it is, how simple it is, that is, i use the palace of the mind, i have it , its quite strange, but there are also hooks there, they are mostly visual, that is, a certain image that refers. To another image, to another image, to another image, just like, uh, in borhiss concept of bondage, why is he interested in bondage at all, yes, this is a very important topic, for him kabbalah constantly appears in him and taught it, yes, yes, it is interesting to him, again, too, as a tool ordering, as a tool for studying the knowledge of language, that is, this very concept, the pentateuch as one giant, stretched out and expanded in all variants, the name of god, and the tree, yes, the sepherod tree, yes, the sepherod tree, which, in general, i really love this concept because it can be applied to any spiral or, well, the spiral structure, from dantes circles of hell to the dna spiral, you know, it seems to me that she specially came with a ring in the shape of a torus, the ring is beautiful. Magical, that is, exactly the book of books, that is, the archetype of the book , enclosed in a ring, borhis has, there is a game, and it seems to me that the game is also important for you, in your work. This can be traced, but this is a kind of play of meanings, a play of symbols, a play on words, a very important image, when the whole is no more than its Component Parts, that is, when in one there is a multitude, in a certain unity, yes, but this unity is no more than each of the Component Parts , that is, the fact that this is connected precisely with his love for small forms, precisely the fact that he must contain all these Component Parts, contain them very much. Laconic form, and you know whats interesting is this concept of the game, which he, of course, always has, we see how he gets a kick out of it, just like that, how he takes his labyrinth of such a hob and turns it over, yes, here s the wrong side, and hes like wow, how cool everything is, and we know writers who continue to follow the behests of jorge our luis and who succeed, this is umberta eco, of course, and what kind of relationship did they have . I dont know if they were connected in real life, but they knew each other without a doubt, that is, without a doubt they knew, and you see, this turns out to be an absolutely wonderful writers greetings, i adore umbert eco for this, that he is in the name of rose, this monstrous blind villain appears before him, the librarian, the monk jorge, who denies the existence and rights to exist of aristotles book on comedy. Because of what is happening, you think that this is a character written by borhis, a clear hint, and a library, but if we dig further, we understand that in this way umberta eco takes off her beautiful italian hat and says hello to borhis, because here of course, behind borhis is his character overoes, who writes a treatise in medieval cordoba and he encounters, well , an arab doctor, teacher, philosopher, he encounters just. The concepts of tragedy and comedy and he does not understand them, poor fellow, that is, in general i was looking for everything borhis has no sense of humor, no, i think that he just, in such a crooked way, just showed that he really appreciates borhiss play, and that thus, in general, overoes, whom borhis sees in the mirror in which he continues to believe, at some point he will understand what comedy is, but in the monastery of uberta eco, the library burns, burns and the manuscript, the monk orge himself burns. Well, this is a separate story, if the world is a library, then our work there is probably manuscripts for we dont know whether this will become a book, whether it will be included in the world library, yes, these manuscripts are burning, i, as a convinced neoplatanian, believe that the manuscripts are burning, but of course there remain shadows on the walls of the cave, that is , our work is for eternity, and the manuscripts are burning, no matter what woland says bulgakova, well , lets listen to the song the manuscript of the mill. Now is the time of fire, dont let me in, im like a rusty ascetic, 3,000 years old, who hasnt written poetry, but. The invisible one is waiting, careful like a cat, touching the milk, oh, the midnight double, he leaned towards the lamp, according to my rules, with a log my, a short beast walks, where i keep this sacrifice to the fire, until the door closes, the circles are burning, they didnt tell you, but they really are burning, and dont change to check back, oh my friends, oh my enemies, how beautiful it is to cut a vein with a feather , the evening is not. Silver, the manuscripts are not burning, they are still burning, you should have seen this act, the manuscripts say, they didnt tell you, but they really say, and dont change ours back, oh my friends, oh my enemies, how beautiful. They burn, manuscripts burn, then they are gloriously loved. Like a ripe pomegranate, my friends, ah my enemies, how beautifully they burn, the manuscript is burning, y. This podcast is a mustread, im glana batnikova, my guest is natalia ushey , musician, lead singer of the melnitsa group, candidate of philological sciences, were talking about jorge luis borgis, you know, borgis, he is exactly, in my opinion, thats. As a collagist, that is, he takes some of these caresses of short forms, he knows mythology wonderfully, knows a variety of subjects wonderfully, its clear that a person has been reading all his life, but he didnt have an active life, all life passed in books, yes, but he actually was also the director of the national library, yes, that is, he is a professional librarian, a great librarian, you can say that , he is my such archetypal library, it seems to me that he gave birth to many waves after himself. Umbert eco, who succeeds, yes, he has this game , it works because you can fold a tender blanket until you lose your pulse, but until you have some kind of magic thread, it will not become magical, it wont magic carpet, that is, lets say paolo coelho, who can be considered borgiss epigote, he doesnt succeed at all. Listen, he even took the title of a story by the very famous aleph, and wrote a novel that is graphic novel, yes, yes, but this is epigonism, in the worst sense, to be honest, but you know, i read this novel, pavlakalia aleph, because it it mentions my friend, in general, on this trip to russia he meets a girl who is the prototype, which was my friend, so i had to read it, although im not very i love kaeli, but im his in general, im his in general. And then i read the original source, borhiss own story, where everything is much more complicated, that is, this is a man who finds himself at the point where all time lines converge, its much more complicated, here you understand, we can say that borhis is a creative writer who exists. In the fourdimensional world, that he not only has our three dimensions , but he also has time, that is, he operates with time here and there, which is why he has this here crossroads, the garden of forking paths, there mentioned, there is this chinese descendant, the author of the labyrinth, he comes to this sinologist doctor who is studying the heritage of his greatgrandfather. It turns out that the book and the labyrinth are one and the same thing, yes, that is, he created labyrinths and created a book, it turned out that they are one and the same thing, and its very interesting there, uh, this doctor asks him a question, and he asks this chinese , yes, this descendant, what word in charade should not be mentioned in a charade, in a charade about chess the word chess should not be mentioned, and he says, i found the key, the labyrinth of your greatgrandfather, that the word time is not mentioned there, this means that the entire labyrinth is dedicated to time and its various layers, that is, there is actually this key there, orchis wrote to his, yes, that is, its just