every Defendant knows to stay ATDS cases pending the outcome of Facebook—especially in Ramsey decision slipped through to decision on the matter, even with Facebook pending. And it did not go well. The Court held that the Defendant’s use of the Noble predictive dialer system qualified as the use of an ATDS under the Sixth Circuit’s articulation of the ATDS definition in Allan. It is critical to note, however, that it was Defendant’s hyper automated usage of Noble that triggered statutory coverage. Noble linked into a system of record called PICK operated by the collector. Because the PICK system AUTOMATICALLY chose accounts and passed phone numbers to be stored and dialed from Noble, without human intervention, the Court determined that an ATDS was used. In the Court’s words: