AIA admits it misled customers, overcharging or wrongly endi

AIA admits it misled customers, overcharging or wrongly ending cover


The FMA case was based on three core breaches: purported enhancement of policy benefits; charging premiums after the termination of a policy and treating policies as terminated when they should have remained in force; and incorrect inflation adjustments.
AIA wrongly told some customers they were entitled to cover enhancements for existing policies, also knowns as passback benefits. However, in reality the benefits only applied to policies after 2003.
Supplied
CEO Nick Stanhope says AIA NZ has reviewed its systems and processes so the situation doesn’t happen again.
AIA misrepresented the benefits and in some cases misled customers about their policies, the FMA said.

Related Keywords

Nick Stanhope , Karen Chang , Financial Markets Authority , High Court , Reserve Bank , Fair Dealing , Financial Markets Conduct Act , நிக் ஸ்டான்ஹோப் , கரேன் சாங் , நிதி சந்தைகள் அதிகாரம் , உயர் நீதிமன்றம் , இருப்பு வங்கி , நியாயமான கையாளுதல் , நிதி சந்தைகள் நடத்தை நாடகம் ,

© 2025 Vimarsana