Stability also this hour amalia man accused of torturing women and destroying ancient monuments in timbuktu goes on trial at the International Criminal court. Im joining us roscoe with the sport as the search begins for a new name for washingtons n. F. L. Team plus top and be a star Russell Westbrook test positive brain of virus and his most cases and find the links the socalled bubble activity world in florida. Thank you for joining us its been more than 3 years since for our symbols an economic blockade on qatar now the uns top court is about to make a major ruling on the dispute which has seen cuts are prevented from flying over there as space the International Court of justice is about to deliver its decision at the hague live pictures officials taking a seat there will go live to step outside the court in the hague in just a moment but 1st. Explains the background to the story his report. Folk ataris this has been a long battle on many fronts the International Court of justice is to issue its verdict on a dispute over airspace riots it began in june 2017 when sandy arabia u. A. E. Bashar ain and egypt sever ties with qatar and imposed a land sea and air blockade. Qatar took the case to the un calling on the International CivilAviation Authority to declare the blockade illegal as part of the dispute the blockade in countries have barred qatari aircraft from entering their airspace which qatar says violates the convention on International Civil aviation referred to as the Chicago Convention of locating countries challenge the qatari move saying the u. N. Agency doesnt have jurisdiction to handle the case but into a 1018 the International CivilAviation Authority rejected that claim insisting that it does have jurisdiction the mast own but we are not there yet in terms of qatars progress because while qatar will move a step closer into regaining airspace access that they like the rest of the world are entitled to fly over actually i k i have never dealt with anything quite like this in over that 70 years of existence then you can expect running in parallel to this a separate case that will be seeking compensation this isnt the 1st legal fight between qatar and its neighbors in 2018 the qatari government took legal action against the u. A. E. At the hague based court accusing it of a series of measures targeting qatari nationals those measures broke up families denied qatari students access to universities and medical facilities in the u. A. E. The Court Ordered the u. A. E. To allow families to be reunited and qatari students to be given the chance to complete their education in the emirates but i think thats part of the structure. Or is there a sense to Group Doctors that. You need to are a solid legal basis for saying that the blockade was was our lord or the consequences or the blockade results. Looked at her legal action to international to mend fences between the blockade in countries have so far failed and the International Community has long been concerned that the blockade of gaza has undermined stability of the region. Lets show you some live pictures now from the i. C. J. The International Court of justice which has begun delivering its verdict in a case involving qatar and its neighbors as you heard there bahrain egypt saudi arabia and the u. A. E. Appealed to the i. C. J. About the jurisdiction of the International CivilAviation Organization i calle Council Qatar had filed the case at over the air space bill kate imposed by its neighbors and so today the i. C. J. Is expected to rule confirming the i. C. At the i. K. O. Is jurisdiction whether or not i care has a jurisdiction to decide on the case lets listen in to what the judges have to say. So we get it here and the united. Way indicated. You and the article 2 section 2 we have the idea of course for all by any of them. For having one you know in. All of these differences do not to resolve different legal conclusions indicate. That of being very necessary for a while. To take them into account. According up sort of people you have to be 5 to 12 back to. Your faith hope for peace open to both. I would only detect that often because it is judged in the fairest cage of degenerate by the nice which is for all who are equally if all of the chicago. A city god is the 2nd. Brought person you and people to sit in for the i. A. S. I went on that he doll the op ed up to par because of his judgement that. Since you told a sure low premium product that he bought a good office of the judgement which you refer to depose each of our cases on people who abuse the submission is of the past. Also for me or summarize some particular piece of the judge. If you. Or balls judge and it will be all of the rules of the sea. A show now begin with a brief somebody off the fact. Under procedure ill use that call to pull. Off an open door 27. 00 pm the government is off bahrain egypt saudi arabia and the united out of immunity if. You could lesion is with. Its year it is your 1st pick youve made relating to to us 30. 00. 000 lines of communication with. Which included certain of you you can. Pursuant to decision truthfulness all of our thoughts are in just the just put it where the are felonies from london out or departing from there or i will deny their right to overfly their perspective. Including the territorial seas within the relevant information. So everything interests think it is also up a lie too long bridges 30 flying form from. Which were required to or they pry out of one from the sea that have vision or thought it is of their pillow. According to their pet a lot of these the distinctive measures were taking this falls to cut that is a lake of its obligations under certain thin for much and i like the human too which is the up bell on the other part is included in the agreement of 23 and 20 form of ember 2030 as well as the American Implement in the union of civic in every 2040 under supplementary year the given of speech in november 24th in which a show very fair to us the. On foot through october 27th 2 sets of proceeding is feeling to the vision of this direction is where the need heated by. Asian is fighting with the commons. In the 3rd is that location initiate its. The president of the International Court of justice in the process there of delivering his verdict in the case involving qatar and its neighboring countries over the blockade the air blockade preventing contact from using the airspace of saudi arabia bahrain the u. A. E. And egypt we have stepped outside the court for us at the hague this is an unprecedented situation for the International Court of justice a complicated case that talk us through for us how this is all going to unfold today. Thats an oddly a very complicated case but also a very important case to the president of the criminal of the court of justice of the use of has just starting to read to judgment and he explained in the beginning that its basically 2 cases that have been filed and that he is giving a verdict about but he sat because one case and thats connected to article 84. 00 of the socalled she cargo agreements signed in 94 to 4 by a lot of International Countries about basically the freedom of movement in airspace the freedom of passenger traffic exactly what qatar wants to achieve that agreement has been signed by all 4 countries by saudi arabia by bahrain by egypt and the u. A. E. Theres another case and that air Services Transit agreement also signed in 1944 which has been filed as well but saudi arabia saudi arabia has not signed this agreement so he sat i will read the charge went on the 84. 00 to Chicago Convention mostly and then he will give a summary on the other case so its very complicated but both cases dealing with the same issue which is freedom of movement and the right for countries to fly over out of countries which as we know has been restricted to qatar 3 years ago so its definitely a very important ruling what he is doing right now is stablish ing if the a. O. Has jurisdiction and thats the main question here and of course the 4 countries that have filed this appeal they have said that ike has no jurisdiction and that they are basically a logic Logistical Organization and this case according to them deals with Security Issues and we will have to hear the judgment exactly what the president will decide it is many options of course on the table and its possible that i go has to do its her. Oh were getting so right well have to listen in and see what he says and itll take a little time before we actually know what the final verdict is because the president of the i. C. J. House will read through a number of procedures and bring us some more information and background to the case for the moment thank you well check in with you later of course lets not bring in hashem whos here. With us. Ok before i bring you back in lets listen once again to the president of the i. C. J. Police to form of the convention on International Civil aviation. If so why did the fia why when i thought of him being the father of the ticket up 27 in which you could call discuss it is up to the function and the school of the 5 or 4 people to call. Did join. Was before the is indeed present the case is made and that ive completed 4 tetovo from the engine. Was ernies the decision of the council on debris even though the objection is we do freeze it in deploy before. The 34. 00 particularly to 4 thats not 55. 00 with all the find of the season is the constant on dimity just be it for the subject to a piece. Because certainly. Piece of need to do it again is the decision of the cult. It is a 972. 00 in judgment in the up he lit into the jurisdiction of the here comes the india suspect foul because they explained it that it would be too accepted stunned this new Good Administration of justice to allow an International Order go to examine and discuss the merits of it just when you just competent to do so was not only an effect but to challenge. Those who did that and up the law against the decision of the council are still the jurisdiction must therefore be the receiver. It is from the stump the point of the supervision by people of the valley over the coals that is that there is norm ground for distinguishing between supervision must do distinction and supervision are still married and. Consequently because of these thoughts that he has jurisdiction to interfere in the present up to you if you notice however that this one couple disagree on the score of the poppy. Dick or recall that keeps up early or all with respect to the exercise by the council of its disputed element functions that are completed for each convention is to defer to mean whether the view any decision is correct. In the present styles is to decide whether because it was. You can put him in that he objects units of their parallel to the jurisdiction of the calle constant mis ability of other. Therefore know what the penalties raise for the groundswell poppy i get is the decision of very kill constant heathkit 1 june 28th. Fair that they submit that the decision or should be set aside on the grounds that the procedures are dropped by the kale considering whats money test the for all i mean very early or fundamental is the police of due process on the fly. And before he. In their 2nd round of appeals. Has not said that detail calls in and i will. In fact unlawful in the executive for the military objects made by them respectful of the comp and of the kill cons and before. According to the op ed along with that of many asian off the real issue in dispute would require the council to move on question is the fall out. Specifically on the law when this offer to come from included says every speech 55. 00 if. You appellant. In the Old Testament for the same reasons they added that the clean this. Is not missing. Under their good elbow puppy in the pedal on his. Constant. When you project their 2nd but if you mean. That the objection will speak on the outset. He used 2 sorts of people and he should of negotiation contain if theyre not particularly true for. The. As part of that objection they also add a new that became the stuff where he not deceitful because had not complied with the procedure of requirement enough people to stop putting it out of the movies for the settlement of the for the. Although the upper limit is he involved. In the balls mentioned in order the decor is not to full or. Decor all that for example and he says he ground this meaning to the i laid. Off day kale calls and interject the Death Penalty so objection that i recall can see that is because i wont be seen on the other they get money 1st the lack of due process in the procedure before becomes. With respect to the 2nd round of puppy in which relate this to the fed is it but it may not be your particular case the before cael comes the up in a long piece that their actions including in particular the vision of his prediction is quite astute to a set of measures and i will adopt the concrete action tool part that is multiple 3 fifths of breaches of its information i will be in. Philly can tell my party is essential to their security. Until it is just to rove compliment or put eyes on it by General Information i will and before think. They express it give you that on the topic of the 2 for each you cover convention your distinction of the columns that you seeing if any disagreement between 2 or more spin. Relates to the interpretation all of you cation of the convention on its side in its. And that becomes the therefore does not have jurisdiction good to get the issues as to whether out of. As. You gave on that infamous and i will include the mortgage in these with the agreement. The core has fairness to the examination with the dispute. Before they kill comes that he said he said he meant it when their fellow stump up the leading to the interpretation what are you casing of each cover. On its own its. In this conflict before. That it comes to this jurisdiction plus jaan in my opinion is something that is super comes out i mean its not particularly good for you to cover convention to this by a few seconds. As they call explaining in 1972. That this agreement in late eightys to the interpretation or a beautician of the Chicago Convention if in order to determine. The coliseum in order to give your blood to intel to put it on the up by the company. To gene with unchristian if we didnt have a few. In supplication on memory i will submit it to gary cale comes the wanted kill over 27 in his quest it becomes a tool and i hope. That they dont mean that there is one that is vitally needed by their actions against the state of their obligation is on the cover convention its not an expense on the other rooms of internet for mobile. Its further quests if you count in the tool and i differ all devotedly should despite that is fondant is of the fundamental principles of if you cover on very thin understanding it seems and go for the. Consequent can you got. To respond. To what we are all we dont believe all of his fiction is in full swing. Or just putting it off until comply with that obligation is something that you cover on vacation and its ironic since. That to negotiating in good faith if you chose other morning u. S. Corporation in the region to save the safety security. And economy often top notch and i. And before didnt. Help out also identified a number of provisions of the chicago home. With which it is view the measure is taken by. Most. The call for incident the disagreement between the fall of 2000 brought before the calle coliseum on set is the interpretation of the chicago meets on its own therefore for this within the school or particularly the fall of the comedy. The me of. This disagreement. In a broader context does not that but i think ale constant or judas diction but are physically too full of become very. Normal or accept that. Because of the upset a lot of his kind of thought eyes that ive usually restrictionist in pulls it off or just put it us in the comfort of many. The coincidence us nor jurisdiction to hear the claims of. Comfort measure this time all of this of course dunston is capable of recruiting the wrongfulness of an otherwise unlawful for the the in International Law a lot of some was involved he defends the prospect that there is one and would praise the defense faces. You know proceeding on demand it is before they kill comes when does not. Have any effect on the colors in his jurisdiction within the limited enough to tell you before of the chicago. As a coffee state he went on seeing that in the end up he from a position of the kill comes in hes 97. The fact that the defense on demand in this pass in a particular. Cut a lot of the confidence of the what i do know or other all of the. Other winds of things would be in a position themselves for all of the phones which would be you know. As has already been seeing you get cases of the kemp of friends of to call the company some of the cones that must have been there on the cover of the new disk submitted 3. Thats 3 days lost on those defenses one demitted his or the other. Which would become irrelevant or moving up the deduced. The call therefore. That becomes the need not when to get the feds but it would mean that he or pick him up at a billeting. Before the appeal counts that that belong to small small greens he and ultimately the relation to the decision could all go for a family that is killing is not enough mischief. They have involved in this. Given before the court. Itself the deputy long to stop me. But is that into detail calls the easy enough miss it is so far as any solution or fun but its clean when necessary if it calls completely up warm up parties of other week does not force this. According to the upper level they decide to use fiction by the cons that would be people with concern for the visas for 2 stiction. All for incompatible with propriety. Policies judicial function