For change in hollywood at last nights Golden Globes. A new day is on the horizon attendees wore black outfits to mark the first major awards ceremony since Sexual Harassment scandals rocked the entertainment industry. Are you suffering from aussie flu . It seems so many people are, but is it worse than usual and is it too late to get a flu jab . Good evening. Welcome to bbc news. The . The Prime Minister has been carrying out a reshuffle of her cabinet, the Major Players in the cabinet are virtually unchanged with philip hammond, amber rudd, borisjohnson and david davis all remaining in post, althoutheremy hunt has a new title as secretary of state for health and social care. Lets have a look at some of the appointments. We dont know yet who is to take over at education but earlier Karen Bradley was appointed Northern Ireland secretary. Replacing James Brokenshire who has resigned due to ill health. Matt hancock has become the new secretary of state for culture, media and sport. While Brandon Lewis becomes chair of the conservative party. And thejustice secretary David Lidington moves to the cabinet office. Replacing him atjustice is david gauke, the former secretary of state at the department for work and pensions. All remaining in post, althoutheremy hunt has a new title as secretary of state for health and social care. Our Political Correspondent leila nathoo is at westminster. Some nathoo is at westminster. Late drama withJustine Greening some late drama withJustine Greening refusing to go to dwp after being told she has to leave education. Absolutely. Somewhat slow moving day, a limited reshuffle so slow moving day, a limited reshuffle so far. Most of the top jobs have stayed the same albeit withjeremy hunt persuading the Prime Minister a p pa re ntly hunt persuading the Prime Minister apparently of his merits to stay in the position of Health Secretary and to ta ke the position of Health Secretary and to take on the role of being in charge of social care. Just in the last few minutes we have heard Justine Greening quitting the government because she has rejected the post of the department for work and pensions. In the last few days ahead of this reshuffle there had been a number of briefings, speculation thatJustine Greening was tipped to go, tipped to be moved from education. It looks like Justine Greening has concluded she didnt want to stay in that role because the Prime Minister had lost confidence in her and didnt want to ta ke confidence in her and didnt want to take up the role in the department for work and pensions. At the moment we have a hole in the Education Department and the department for work and pensions but we are expecting those two roles to be filled tonight. Some people were speculating, some within the conservative party, this would be the kind of reshuffle that would reinvigorate theresa mays premiership, reassert her authority she has gained after moving on to phase two of the brexit talks with brussels, this was a sense of a new beginning. Is that the way you see it . That is certainly the hope of theresa may. She wants to prove her government is more than brexit, she wa nts to government is more than brexit, she wants to have a domestic policy agenda and wants a good team in place but i think it was telling the first appointments we got earlier today were not in government, nothing to do with policy but actually in the conservative party itself so we had the outgoing chairman of the conservative Party Sir Patrick Mcloughlin leaving his post. He was replaced, the first person to be replaced in the cabinet by Brandon Lewis as the chairman at the helm of the conservative party. Then a team of fresh faces appointed behind him, a new deputy, james cleverley, considered to be a rising star for the party and a cleverley, considered to be a rising starfor the party and a number of vice chairs including two from last yea rs intake vice chairs including two from last years intake of new mps. It was telling there was a lot of change within the tory party itself. A lot of emphasis on trying to renew the party, bring new ideas, get it back asa party, bring new ideas, get it back as a strong campaigning force after the election result last year and the election result last year and the performance on the ground left a lot to be desired. I think that was theresa mays focus to try to get the tory Party Back Together and more limited in terms of ministerial reshuffles this evening. What is seen as reshuffles this evening. What is seen as a reshuffles this evening. What is seen as a pretty key appointment is Brandon Lewis, as you have been indicating, at conservative party hq. Indicating, at conservative party hq, to try and get the party a little bit more in tune with Younger Voters, for instance, that kind of thing. Is there a real sense that the party can move in that direction and perhaps beat labour on its turf . It was telling when you read sir patrick mcloughlins letter to theresa may saying he was going to leave his post. He recognised, he said, there needed to be a new generation of conservatives being brought in at the helm of the party, talent from the back benches, talent from the junior ministerial ranks. Thats what theresa may has tried to do, certainly in terms of the conservative party machinery, to promote morejunior conservative party machinery, to promote more junior ministers, promote more junior ministers, promote people of a younger generation, there was certainly more women, more mps from minority ethic backgrounds promoted within the conservative party too. I think this isa conservative party too. I think this is a nod, a gesture to try to kickstart the tory partys electoral appeal once again, to appeal to Younger Voters who really deserted the tory party at last years election and flocked to labour, to appeal to minority ethnic voters and really start a new generation and a new phase in the tory party with new ideas, new thinking and a new approach fit for the digital age. Thank you. And well find out how this story and many others are covered in tomorrows front pages. At 10 40 this evening in the papers. My guests joining me tonight are the times columnist Jenni Russell and martin lipton, deputy head of sport at the sun. A couple who met on an internet dating website have been convicted of planning a devastating christmas terror attack inspired by the Islamic State group. Munir mohammed, an Asylum Seeker from sudan who was living in derby, had stored up bomb making components with the help of a his girlfriend, a pharmacist. The court heard the pair were also researching how to make the deadly poison, ricin in the foiled attack a year ago. This is a story which stretches to the streets of sudan. The couple now convicted both had roots here, but they linked up thousands of miles away in the uk. Munir mohammed entered britain illegally and then sought asylum. A couple of years later, although married, he went on a muslim dating site, singlemuslim. Com, and found his partner in crime. He was attracted to Rowaida El Hassan because she was a pharmacist. He needed her scientific know how to mount a terror attack. They were both wedded to an extremist ideology. They began sharing is execution videos. Together, the couple plotted a terror outrage in the uk in the run up to christmas 2016. Munir mohammed would carry it out. He was living in a bedsit in derby. Described as a bedroom jihadi, here, over the internet, he took instructions from a man believed to be an is commander, and told him, im ready. Munir mohammed had been picked up on cctv in asda. He was shopping for everyday items containing chemicals he needed for his bomb, all the time being guided over the phone by his girlfriend using her pharmacy experience. In his bedsit, officers found bomb making components and instructions on how to use mobile phone detonators and the poison ricin. His is commander had posted an instruction on facebook which read, place poison in food like fruit and vegetables in markets or inject poison in drinks and foods that are prohibited in islam. At that time, Munir Mohammed was working here at kerry foods in burton on trent. He was in the kitchens, making sauces for ready meals that are sold in tesco and morrisons. Using fake id with someone elses name, he got the job through the Gi Recruitment company. Munir mohammed was planning a bomb attack. There was no evidence he ever had any poison. But detectives say that because of his interest in ricin and his support for is, he did pose a threat to this factory. He certainly was a risk. Had that food company known or had we known of his interest in ricin and his link to that food company, we would have taken steps to protect the public and to prevent him from continuing that employment there. Kerry foods, a global brand, told us. The Gi Recruitment company which gave mohammed thejob here said. They had no idea the man they recruited was also a recruit to is. This couple was stopped by the police and Security Service mi5. They will be sentenced next month. June kelly, bbc news. Breaking news on the continuing reshuffle of theresa mays cabinet. A name for you you may not have heard of him, now the education secretary, he is damian hinds mp. He becomes secretary of state for education, replacing Justine Greening who was offered the job at dwp but refused and now has left government but mrhinds is the mp for east hampshire. He was ex checkers secretary to the treasury in may 2015 until he went to the department for work and pensions injuly 2016. So, he has been in thatjob about 18 months or so. He is now secretary of state for education. The bbcs china editor, Carrie Gracie, has stepped down from the role because of what shes called an indefensible pay gap between men and women at the bbc. In an open letter addressed to licence fee payers, Carrie Gracie who is remaining at the bbc accused the corporation of breaking equality law. But the bbc says an independent audit of rank and file staff found no systemic discrimination against women. Heres our media editor amol rajan. Chinese once called chairman mao the great helmsman. Carrie gracie is one of the most respected International Editors of her generation. For more than 30 years, she has broadcast about other people, but this time, she is the centre of the story. Ms gracie resigned from her position as china editor because she is paid less than men who are also International Editors. This morning, she presented the today programme on radio 4. Its been very moving, actually. The news of her resignation leaked out online last night. Six months after the bbc was forced to reveal the salaries of some highly paid on air staff, ms gracie has been infuriated by the response to her grievance. She was offered a pay rise of £45,000 but declined it, saying equality is what she wants. She would not be drawn on whether she wanted male colleagues to take a pay cut. When i started the china job, i said i will only do this job if im paid equally. And injuly 2017, i discovered the enormous gap, that the two men who were International Editors were earning 50 more, at least, than the two women who were International Editors. The bbc has completed two of the three pay audits it announced last year, and found no evidence of discrimination. The final one will report in a matter of weeks. The corporation declined to put anyone up for an interview, but in a statement, they said. The bbc talks about a gender pay gap, but what im talking about is not a gender pay gap, where sometimes men and women are in different roles, which explains the differences in pay, what im talking about is sex discrimination, in pay, what im talking about is pay discrimination, which is when men are paid more for doing the same job or a job of equal value. That is illegal. There is tremendous anger among many female staff at all levels of this corporation. Senior figures at the bbc say they take this issue very seriously, but many employees have found the process of fighting for equal pay completely unbearable. The salience of this story, however, arises from its implications beyond this place, because its happening in a climate in which many women across several industries say they have suffered injustice and inequality for far too long. Equality legislation doesnt work. We need to make it work. We make it work by forcing companies to be honest, which is still not happening, and by forcing companies to examine their hiring, promotion and parental leave policies. Equal pay for equal work is a legal requirement. But who decides what equal work is . Ultimately, its usually the employer. This is what makes tackling gender pay issues so difficult, because obviously, we want people to be treated equally and given equal opportunities in the workplace, but employers also need to have the capacity to offer people flexible payments, bonuses and that kind of thing to reward and incentivise people to do well in theirjob. The bbcs Public Ownership and obligations means it has to set unique standards and face unique scrutiny. With 200 formal complaints in train and the possibility of legal action, this story will run and run. Amol rajan, bbc news. With me is seanjones a barrister specialising in Employment Law in the media industry. We are talking about the equality act here. Just explain for viewers what it says in terms of pay between gender, between black and white even. It treats those two things very differently. So, equal pay, its a lawyers word for sex equality in pay. It has its own special regime, so if you pay someone own special regime, so if you pay someone less own special regime, so if you pay someone less money own special regime, so if you pay someone less money because theyre a member of an ethnic minority they have to prove theyve been discriminated against in the ordinary way. There is an extraordinarily complex probably overcom plex extraordinarily complex probably overcomplex set of laws which apply to gender equality in pay. They have a unique and supposedly sort of magic way of dealing with it, so in everyones contracts, sex equality clause, if your contract bumps into another contract which has better terms and conditions, and the reason for the difference is sex, your contract automatically rewrites itself. So its a very weird way of dealing with it. Probably rather overlegislated and has proven systemically ineffective in prkt protecting womens interests in pay but it is unique to gender inequality. The bbc says its had a judge led audit, another inquiry, there is no systemic problem here. But are there any grounds that any employee, not just the but are there any grounds that any employee, notjust the bbc, but any employer could have for paying someone employer could have for paying someone different to a colleague even though one may be male or one female . Yes, there is no general right to be paid the same as someone else. There is no general right . If you have two male twins, doing the samejob, if you have two male twins, doing the same job, paid if you have two male twins, doing the samejob, paid differently, the law doesnt help them. So, what gender inequality law is aimed at is ensuring that you dont get less because you are a woman or get less because you are a woman or get less because you are a woman or get less because you are a man. So, the way the law approaches it is to say the best indicator thats happening is if you are doing equal work but not getting equal money. If you can get past that step you turn to the employer and say, well whats your reason, why are you paying less . Theyre entitled to come up with what they call a material factor defence, they say here is the reason we are paying less, its nothing to do with your sex. If an employer has that reason, they have a defence to a claim. So, there is many reasons as there are employers and as many reasons as there as there are employers and as many reasons 3s there are as there are employers and as many reasons as there are employees. It depends on the specific factors in the case. In this case we dont know what the material factors relied the case. In this case we dont know what the materialfactors relied on are. Right. Indeed, the subject in question, Carrie Gracie, says she has no other material factors. Thats surprising, you expect an employer to say upfront and loudly, here is the reason you are getting less. If she hasnt been told that, thats a surprise. Apart from the bbc saying 0k, well, there may be a case here, we will move forward in a way that you would be happy with, is this the kind of case that typically ends up in an employment tribunal . Cases typically dont end up in employment tribunal. Some things are usually sorted out . Because the law is so difficult and prospects are difficult to predetective that people have a strong interest in making sure they do a deal quickly and no employer wants to be taken to tribunal and to be proven to be the kind of employer who doesnt pay People Fairly because of their sex. So everyone has an interest in reaching a deal if they can. The kind of cases that to get to tribunal are generally un backed mass claimant actions and there are a lot of those on at the moment, tribunals are full of equal pay claims but not