For San Marino. San marino and success at last for San Marino. They San Marino and success at last for San Marino. They win San Marino and success at last for San Marino. They win their l for San Marino. They win their first competitive game in 20 years. We will hear reaction. Hello, im matthew amroliwala. Welcome to todays verified life. Israeli forces are reported to have shot dead a 26 year old american activist in the occupied West Bank. Aysenur eygi, whos of turkish descent, is said to have been taking part in a Protest Againstjewish Settlement expansion in the town of beita near nablus. Turkey has described her death as a murder carried out by the netanyahu government. The us says it is deeply disturbed by the death and is urgently seeking information from israel. The Israeli Military says it is looking into the incident. Lets speak to our correspondent in jerusalem, mike thomson. Lets start in terms of the details we know. Tell me what we think happened. We think happened. Well, the cum we think happened. Well, the Young American we think happened. Well, the Young American activist we think happened. Well, the Young American Activist Had L Young American activist had been part of a local campaign which demonstrates quite regularly against the expansion of settlements in the West Bank, it is reported by local media that israeli police troops opened a live fire. They also used Stun Grenades and Tear Gas to try to stop the protest continuing. And during that, she was hit in the head by a bullet, taken to a hospital in a nearby nablus, but died later. Hospital in a nearby nablus, but died later. And in terms of the reaction, but died later. And in terms of the reaction, i but died later. And in terms of the reaction, i read but died later. And in terms of the reaction, i read out but died later. And in terms of the reaction, i read out somel the reaction, i read out some of the lines there in the introduction. Just take us through it. Introduction. Just take us through it introduction. Just take us throu~h it. ~ ,. through it. Well, the Israeli Military have through it. Well, the israelii military have acknowledged through it. Well, the Israeli Military have acknowledged that live fire was used, but they say stones had been hurled at their troops. They have been threatening them, particularly by one instigator, they called it, one person instigating it all. Shots were aimed at that person. There is no clarity on who that person was. And, as you said earlier, the american government has said that it deeply disturbed it was happening, as well as the ambassador to israel, and they are seeking information about exactly what it happened. But the israelis have not actually said that they did this. They said that they did this. They said they are looking into it to try to find out what happened to cause this death. Antony blinken has just looking in the last few minutes deploring the loss of a us citizen that has been killed. The us State Department has been increasingly concerned about similar activity. 0nly last week and what we were talking about new sanctions that had been imposed. Indeed, and there was that had been imposed. Indeed, and there was a that had been imposed. Indeed, and there was a village that had been imposed. Indeed, and there was a village only and there was a village only about three or four weeks ago, that was invaded by around 100 settlers. Homes are set on fire. Cars were burnt. 0ne Local Resident died. And thats just one of hundreds of attacks by settlers on palestinians in the West Bank which had led to the West Bank which had led to the sanctions you mentioned there by the us, and these attacks have increased usually since the start of the war in gaza. And they are causing increasing concern. My gaza. And they are causing increasing concern. Gaza. And they are causing increasing concern. My life or if theyre in increasing concern. My life or if theyre in jerusalem, increasing concern. My life or| if theyre in jerusalem, thanks if theyre injerusalem, thanks very much. To the us, because a lawyer for Donald Trump has asked a federal Appeals Court to overturn a Jury Verdict finding Mr Trump liable for sexually assaulting and defaming the writer Ejean Carroll. Donald trump appeared live in for it to court and also appealed the decision against the verdict against him and eg and carol. This is what he said in a news conference. This evolved in a news conference. This evolved into in a news conference. This evolved into a in a news conference. This evolved into a defamation| in a news conference. M 3 evolved into a Defamation Case against me because i disputed her words because i told the truth. We were called. I was in the white house, and i said, no, it never happened. I did not even know what they were talking about. I was in the oval office. Sir, do you know anything about this was met and this had to do with the book, and she had a few pages in a book making this claim. By the way, there was never a claim, there was never a police report, there was never anything mentioned. There was never a publicity 30 or a0 years ago, whenever it took place. Nobody knows. She does not know when it took place. When did it take place . She has no idea. She thinks it was in the 1990s. She thinks it was in the 1990s. She thinks it was in the Nineteen Nineties and The Judge, he had to trial. We asked for a consolidation, he said no. The reason he said no was because he would rather have double the publicity because thats bad for me, very bad. Because im running for president , and this is not the kind of publicity you like. And whether its true or not, its horrible, and in this case, its so false. Its a made up, fabricated story by somebody i think initiallyjust looking to promote a book. And when they call me, i deny the story and got sued essentially for deformation because im denying the story. Well, im right. I should be sending herfor defamation. Should be sending her for defamation. Should be sending her for defamation. defamation. That was donald trum defamation. That was Donald Trump speaking defamation. That was Donald Trump speaking in defamation. That was Donald Trump speaking in new defamation. That was Donald Trump speaking in New York| defamation. That was Donald I Trump speaking in New York in the last half an hour. Lets speak to our correspondent nada tawfik. I will come to what Donald Trump was saying in a moment but in terms what his lawyers were saying in court, what is the basis of his appeal on this . the basis of his appeal on this . ~. this . Yeah, well, matthew, remember this . Yeah, well, matthew, remember this this . Yeah, well, matthew, remember this is this . Yeah, well, matthew, remember this is one this . Yeah, well, matthew, remember this is one of. This . Yeah, well, matthew, | remember this is one of two cases remember this is one of two cases that E Jean Carroll, the columnist cases that E Jean Carroll, the Columnist Clement brought against Columnist Clement brought against Donald Trump. And essentially his lawyers are trying essentially his lawyers are trying to overturn the verdict that trying to overturn the verdict that found Donald Trump liable for Sexually Abusing and defending her. And Donald Trump 02ment defending her. And Donald Trump ozment lawyers said they want a new Trial Ozment lawyers said they want a new trial because they say two of the new trial because they say two of the women who were allowed to testify of the women who were allowed to testify essentially had an egregious bias against Donald Trump, egregious bias against Donald Trump, that their testimony is evidence trump, that their testimony is evidence was improperly allowed by the evidence was improperly allowed by The Judge. He said it was an unfair by The Judge. He said it was an unfairand by The Judge. He said it was an unfairand improper by The Judge. He said it was an unfair and improper effort to buttress unfair and improper effort to buttress the testimony of E Jean buttress the testimony of E Jean Carroll. And it was a short jean carroll. And it was a short hearing, matthew, about ten minutes for Donald Trump 0zment ten minutes for Donald Trump ozment lawyers to make their arguments in front of this Panel Arguments in front of this panel of arguments in front of this panel of three judges. And then we heard panel of three judges. And then we heard from E Jean Carrolls lawyer, we heard from E Jean Carrolls lawyer, roberta kaplan. In her argument lawyer, roberta kaplan. In her argument was essentially that there argument was essentially that there were no issues at all in bringing there were no issues at all in bringing this evidence forward, that the bringing this evidence forward, that The Judge had carefully considered it and that these women considered it and that these women were showing a pattern of donald women were showing a pattern of Donald Trump first having pleasant interactions with women, then pouncing on them suddenly women, then pouncing on them suddenly. And then denying the encounter when the women would come encounter when the women would come forward. This is according to e come forward. This is according to E Jean come forward. This is according to E Jean Carrolls lawyer, enjoy to E Jean Carrolls lawyer, enjoy the point of The Judges that Donald Trump Ozment Team did not that Donald Trump Ozment Team did not call any of their own witnesses and that they could have witnesses and that they could have cross examined the women if they have cross examined the women if they wanted. And Donald Trump if they wanted. And Donald Trump ozment lawyers were also upset Trump Ozment lawyers were also upset about the admission of the kind upset about the admission of the kind of infamous Access Hollywood Tape where Donald Trump Hollywood Tape where Donald Trump talks about grabbing Women Trump talks about grabbing women by their genitals. And so the court women by their genitals. And so the court has not made a decision the court has not made a decision yet, matthew. It was not a decision yet, matthew. It was not a to decision yet, matthew. It was not a to do that today, but they not a to do that today, but they will not a to do that today, but they will rule in the future about this issue. They will rule in the future about this issue. Now, this case of course, about this issue. Now, this case of course, he about this issue. Now, this case of course, he is about this issue. Now, this case of course, he is trying about this issue. Now, this I Case of course, he is trying to overturn that 5 Million Jury Verdict, but there was than other verdict, a different jury, the ordered Donald Trump to pay Ejean Carroll 83 Million for having defamed her and damaging her reputation in june 2019. Now thats different, but its interesting listening to Donald Trump there in that news conference, extraordinarily there he is again repeating that libel that is all a hoax. It again repeating that libel that is all a hoax. Is all a hoax. It really is extraordinary, is all a hoax. It really is| extraordinary, matthew, is all a hoax. It really is extraordinary, matthew, because if you extraordinary, matthew, because if you took extraordinary, matthew, because if you look at the difference from if you look at the difference from that first verdict and the awards. From that first verdict and the awards, the awards from the jury. Awards, the awards from the jury. The awards, the awards from the jury, the first award was five as you jury, the first award was five as you mentioned the second was 83 Million as you mentioned the second was 83 Million was up and what E Jean 83 Million was up and what E Jean Carrolls lawyers had argued jean carrolls lawyers had argued in that second trial was that it argued in that second trial was that it needed to be a large amount that it needed to be a large amount in monetary damages to deter amount in monetary damages to deter Donald Trump from defaming ejean deter Donald Trump from defaming E Jean Carroll in the future defaming E Jean Carroll in the future. But despite that, despite that heavy Price Tag that despite that heavy Price Tag that Donald Trump is facing in the civii that Donald Trump is facing in the civil cases which are separate of his criminal trials. Separate of his criminal trials, here he has remained defiant, trials, here he has remained defiant, staying there in that press defiant, staying there in that Press Conference and insisting that he Press Conference and insisting that he did not know E Jean Carroll, that he did not know E Jean Carroll, that he never touched her, carroll, that he never touched her. That carroll, that he never touched her, that she is doing this simply her, that she is doing this simply to kind of raise her profile simply to kind of raise her profile and this is all politically motivated. She has of course politically motivated. She has of course it back at that, insisting of course it back at that, insisting that he did rape her insisting that he did rape her in the insisting that he did rape her in the 90s. So, matthew, Donald Trump in the 90s. So, matthew, Donald Trump very in the 90s. So, matthew, Donald Trump very much with the Election Trump very much with the election in mind of Course Stilt Election in mind of course still trying to argue this case and the still trying to argue this case and the Public Domain as well. Thank and the Public Domain as well. Thank you and the Public Domain as well. Thank you for taking us through all of that, thank you. Kenyas Deputy President says 70 children are missing after a fire at a Primary School. At least 17 boys are known to have died. The blaze tore through the Schools Dormitory in central kenya. Local officials said the fire broke out at 11pm at the hillside Primary School in nyeri county, where 156 boys were sleeping. More than 2000 people tried to help rescue the boys, many of whom were sheltering under their beds. The cause of the fire is still not clear. President William Ruto called the fire horrific and devastating and has ordered an investigation. The Deputy President has been speaking from The School is often gave us this update. We still have 70 often gave us this update. Still have 70 kids that are not accounted for. Now that does not mean that they have perished or they are injured. But it means they are unaccounted for. We are praying and hoping for the best, and this is where i need to make an appeal. When this happened, some parents came here and took over their children and they have not filed this report. I am appealing to each and every parent who took their child from here. To report that same, for the records and The School so that we know where that child is full. The Deputy President urging parents to come forward with 70 they know are missing they dont know how many were rescued or ran away over taken away soon appeal there for those parents to contact the authorities. Around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news. Well come back to bbc news. The 1a Year old boy accused of shooting dead four people at a High School in the Us State Of Georgia has appeared in court for the first time. Colt gray is facing Murder Charges after wednesdays attack, which injured nine others. He did not enter a plea. His father, colin gray, also appeared in court after being charged over the shooting. Investigators allege the 5a Year old gave his Son A Weapon despite knowing that he was a threat to himself and others. Heres some of what The Judge had to say in the fathers hearing. Felony murder in the second degree, the maximum penalty for each count is up to 30 years imprisonment. For felony involuntary manslaughter, of course again there are four counts, the maximum penalty for each of those offences is ten years imprisonment. For the eight Felony Cruelty to children counts, the maximum penalty under the law for each of those eight counts is ten years imprisonment. For a maximum total possible penalty for the charges that you currently are facing of 180 years imprisonment. The british Home Secretary excessive government will not rest until the criminal gangs who smuggle small boats across the English Channel are dismantled. She has been meeting with Law Enforcement bodies to discuss cracking down on the gangs. Her comments, shortly after a Van Driver received a ten Year Prison Term for smuggling migrants in eight Secret Compartment where they were found screaming for help and starved of oxygen. Lets talk more about todays meeting on trying to crack the smuggler gangs. Earlier, the Prime Minister, sir Keir Starmer, said the government were working to crack down on the gangs behind the operation, but ruled out bringing back the rwanda scheme. Have a listen. Its really important that we bear down on this. We were elected in as a government of change, and the Hard Work has already begun. Weve already managed to return over 3000 people who were not entitled to be here. That includes the single biggest dedicated flight that weve ever had, so we are making progress. I acknowledge more needs to be done. Weve got to take down the gangs that are running this vile trade of putting people into boats in the first place. Thats why im her