ProtectIon for theIr chIldren. Now, If someone under 16 trIes to make theIr Account PublIc they WIll have to add a parent to approve It. They WIll have to add a parent to approve It to approve It. That parent WIll then also to approve It. That parent WIll then also be to approve It. That parent WIll then also be able to approve It. That parent WIll then also be able to to approve It. That parent WIll then also be able to see to approve It. That parent WIll then also be able to see who | then also be able to see who theIr chIld messages and whIch topIcs they follow. Older teens WIll have to verIfy theIr own age. NotIfIcatIons WIll be muted overnIght and young people WIll get an alert If they spend an hour on the app. The bIggest change Is that under sIxteens WIll need parental permIssIon to alter any of that settIng. Some parents have campaIgned for years for better protectIon for theIr chIldren. Years for better protectIon for theIr chIldren. Ian russells Daughter Molly took Her own lIfe In 2017 after vIewIng Self Harm Content on Instagram. These new tools mIght gIve parents extra oversIght, but they stIll Cant Control Instagram algorIthms they are very good at drummIng up they are very good at drummIng up er, but they have to be good at beIng transparent. SometIme before chrIstmas, when these measures are In place and the chIldren are usIng them, we should know from meta how they are workIng and wHere tHere are stIll problems and what they are doIng to plug the gaps. These new tools mIght gIve parents extra oversIght, but they stIll Cant Control Instagram algorIthms or what content appears In the app In the fIrst place. And thats all assumIng that parents want thIs extra responsIbIlIty. SpeakIng just last week, Meta Exec NIck clegg saId, In realIty, the Tech GIant has found that parents are reluctant to sIgn up and use these features. Zoe kleInman, bbc news. The head of the bbc has saId he cant see Huw Edwards workIng at the corporatIon agaIn after the presenter was gIven a sIx month suspended prIson sentence, for makIng Indecent Images of chIldren. Edwards WIll also be placed on the Sex Offenders regIster for seven years. Injuly, the former newsreader admItted havIng 41 Images, whIch were sent to hIm on whatsapp 7 IncludIng some showIng a vIctIm aged between seven and nIne. Our Culture Reporter Noor NanjI told us more. As you say, It Is a day after Huw Edwards was sentenced on those abuse Images. TIm devI was fIrst of all asked whetHer he thought that Huw Edwards would Ever work at the bbc agaIn, and he saId for obvIous reasons he cannot see that happenIng. He saId, gIven the appallIng crImes he hasjust been convIcted of, he was also asked about scrubbIng Huw Edwards from the archIves. On that matter, he saId that we nEver completely rIpped and ban people from the archIves, but he cannot see a scenarIo In whIch edwards Is used In day to day programmIng. More broadly, he was also stayIng wIthIn the bbc tHere Is a sense of Shock And Anger and upset about what has happened, but he says It Is not really about the corporatIon. It Is about the vIctIms and theIr famIlIes. FInally, he was asked about the money and remember the bbc has asked Huw Edwards to return that 200,000 that he earned Ever sInce hIs arrest last november, and on that front he says, we want the money back, we have asked for It back, but thatIs we have asked for It back, but that Is all he Is able to say at thIs poInt. In scotland, the government has agreed to host the 2026 Commonwealth Games In glasgow. It WIll be a smaller event compared wIth the last games, wIth only 10 13 sports beIng featured. That Is compared wIth 18 In 2014. The lIberal Democrat Party conference closes In brIghton shortly wIth a key Note Speech from Leader SIr Ed davey. Hell say that fIghtIng to fIx what he calls the broken nhs Is what hIs party WIll prIorItIse above all otHer Issues from now on. Our polItIcal correspondent DamIan GrammatIcas Is tHere. Damon, It Is the fInal stretch for The Party and of course we are goIng to be hearIng from the leader. The leader. Exactly rIght. It Is the fInal, the leader. Exactly rIght. It Is the fInal, bIg the leader. Exactly rIght. It Is the fInal, bIg event the leader. Exactly rIght. It Is the fInal, bIg event of. The leader. Exactly rIght. It| Is the fInal, bIg event of thIs conference. Four days of It, we have been Here sInce saturday. As you say, by the seasIde, the lIb dems have all been In very upbeat mood WIll stop and just now, as we were gettIng ready to talk to you they are all lInIng up downstaIrs goIng Into that BIg Hall wHere Ed Davey Is goIng to gIve that speech. As you say, the Advance BrIefIng Is all that he Is goIng to focus on, the nhs, he has been preparIng thIs mornIng. He has been out playIng tennIs and the cameras were fIlmIng that. The lIb dems have been doIng thIs, tryIng to create thIs sense of Ed Davey out tHere doIng hIs dIfferent stunts and actIvItIes, hIs sort of personable character that they want to try to project. But he has got a serIous Message And Purpose In that speech, too. WIth me to talk a bIt about that, archIe mItchell, the Independence polItIcal correspondent. FIrst of all, obvIously, we are tryIng to close wIth thIs conference. You have been Here a week, we have seen the lIb dems very upbeat mood, Is that how you would sum It up . A posItIve feelIng . It has defInItely been the Party AtmospHere Here, they are celebratIng they have got so many celebratIng they have got so many mps, the most they have Ever many mps, the most they have Ever had~ many mps, the most they have Ever had. Anyone that you speak to WIll Ever had. Anyone that you speak to WIll tell Ever had. Anyone that you speak to WIll tell you that It feels remarkably dIfferent. THere are so many remarkably dIfferent. THere are so many more campaIgners, stakeholders, busInesses, who have stakeholders, busInesses, who have to stakeholders, busInesses, who have to come to try to get an ear of have to come to try to get an ear of these new mps. Have to come to try to get an ear of these new mp5. The mp5 are baskIng In It and so are the are baskIng In It and so are the actIvIsts. Are baskIng In It and so are the actIvIsts. ~. the actIvIsts. We have seen the mp5 out on the actIvIsts. We have seen the mp5 out on the the actIvIsts. We have seen the mp5 out on the rIdes, the actIvIsts. We have seen the mp5 out on the rIdes, enjoyIng | mps out on the rIdes, enjoyIng themselves. As you say EverywHere you go around Here Is the 72, that number. The lIb dems are also sayIng that they now have a job to do, the 72 mps. Because they keep repeatIng they have earned some trust, but they now have to delIver on that. DelIver on that. They are hoInr delIver on that. They are hopIng that delIver on that. They are hopIng that the delIver on that. They are hopIng that the 72 delIver on that. They are hopIng that the 72 mp5 I delIver on that. They are I hopIng that the 72 mp5 are delIver on that. They are hopIng that the 72 mp5 are In areas hopIng that the 72 mp5 are In areas that often mIght not have had lIberal Democrat Mps Ever before had lIberal Democrat Mps Ever before. If theyd delIver, If they before. If theyd delIver, If they fIght for the Issues that they they fIght for the Issues that they thought the campaIgn on such they thought the campaIgn on such as they thought the campaIgn on such as clearIng up the waterways, and are seen as strong waterways, and are seen as strong local champIons, the 72 mp5 strong local champIons, the 72 mp5 WIll strong local champIons, the 72 mp5 WIll hold onto theIr seats mps WIll hold onto theIr seats at the mps WIll hold onto theIr seats at the next ElectIon And WInd more at the next ElectIon And WInd more mp5 at the next electIon after more mp5 at the next electIon after that. More mp5 at the next electIon afterthat. It more mp5 at the next electIon after that. It Is defInItely now after that. It Is defInItely now about those 72 mp5 gettIng on wIth now about those 72 mp5 gettIng on wIth the job. | now about those 72 mp5 gettIng on wIth the job. On wIth the ob. I get the sense that on wIth the job. I get the sense that the on wIth the job. I get the sense that the lIberal. Sense that the lIberal democrats are feelIng, they have a bIt of an openIng, what we are goIng to hearfrom Ed DaveyIs we are goIng to hearfrom Ed Davey Is talkIng about Doom And Gloom from the government. He arrIved Here on hIsjet skI. AnotHer of hIs stunts. But they are sort of posItIve kInd of approach almost has a bIt of an openIng Here. And that Is somethIng that they want capItalIse on wIth that message, partIcularly focused on those key themes. Hhs message, partIcularly focused on those key themes. On those key themes. Nhs In partIcular on those key themes. Nhs In partIcular. He on those key themes. Nhs In partIcular. He Is on those key themes. Nhs In partIcular. He Is goIng on those key themes. Nhs In partIcular. He Is goIng to on those key themes. Nhs In | partIcular. He Is goIng to urge keIr partIcular. He Is goIng to urge KeIr Starmer to lIghten up. I thInk KeIr Starmer to lIghten up. I thInk that was one of the Key Messages of hIs speech, one of hIs Key Messages of hIs speech, one of hIs key attacks on labour. You mentIoned hIs key attacks on labour. You mentIoned hIm beIng out and about mentIoned hIm beIng out and about playIng tennIs thIs mornIng, those pIctures look fantastIc mornIng, those pIctures look fantastIc. But you cannot ImagIne fantastIc. But you cannot ImagIne KeIr Starmer It when He Isahout ImagIne KeIr Starmer It when he Is about to ImagIne KeIr Starmer It when he Is about to address the Labour Conference comIng up beIng out In the conference comIng up beIng out In the mornIng playIng tennIs beforehand. He WIll be Hold Up In hIs beforehand. He WIll be Hold Up In hIs room, you would thInk, preparIng In hIs room, you would thInk, preparIng to keep bangIng on about preparIng to keep bangIng on about thIs physIcaL InHerItance that we about thIs physIcaL InHerItance that we keep hearIng about. WHeres that we keep hearIng about. WHeres thIs Is a complete contrast, wHeres thIs Is a complete contrast, they are posItIve, excIted contrast, they are posItIve, excIted about the upcomIng parlIament and they are ready to type parlIament and they are ready to type In parlIament and they are ready to type In those Issues. The nhs, to type In those Issues. The nhs, waterways. To type In those Issues. The nhs, waterways. The physIcaL InHerItance nhs, waterways. The physIcaL InHerItance Is nhs, waterways. The physIcaL InHerItance Is InterestIng. Nhs, waterways. The physIcaL InHerItance Is InterestIng. The L InHerItance Is InterestIng. The lIb dems do say that they are aware that the physIcaL InHerItance, that the government has taken on, Is a real problem. QuestIoned about that lots of theIr polIcIes are all about spendIng money, whIch In thIs current clImate Is dIffIcult. School meals, they want to spend that, fIxIng nhs, thatIs want to spend that, fIxIng nhs, that Is not new money but they are talkIng about money goIng Into that. And InterestIngly, SIr Ed Davey was asked about otHer taxes, and we have a clIp of what he told our polItIcal edItor about InHerItance Tax, that they mIght consIder changIng that, as well. That that they mIght consIder changIng that, as well. At the Veneral ChangIng that, as well. At The General ElectIon changIng that, as well. At The General ElectIon we changIng that, as well. At The General ElectIon we put changIng that, as well. At the I General ElectIon we put forward an ambItIous General ElectIon we put forward an ambItIous package General ElectIon we put forward an ambItIous package that General ElectIon we put forward an ambItIous package that wasl an ambItIous package that was fully casted, an ambItIous package that was fully costed, we an ambItIous package that was fully costed, we saId an ambItIous package that was fully costed, we saId It an ambItIous package that was fully costed, we saId It would I fully costed, we saId It would come fully costed, we saId It would come from fully costed, we saId It would come from rEversIng fully costed, we saId It would come from rEversIng the fully costed, we saId It would come from rEversIng the taxl come from rEversIng the Tax Cuts come from rEversIng the Tax Cuts to come from rEversIng the Tax Cuts to the come from rEversIng the Tax Cuts to the banks come from rEversIng the Tax Cuts to the banks that come from rEversIng the Tax Cuts to the banks that the I cuts to the banks that the conservatIves cuts to the banks that the conservatIves made. Cuts to the banks that the conservatIves made. It I cuts to the banks that the conservatIves made. It Is| cuts to the banks that the I conservatIves made. It Is 4 BIllIon conservatIves made. It Is 4 BIllIon that conservatIves made. It Is 4 BIllIon that went conservatIves made. It Is 4 BIllIon that went to conservatIves made. It Is 4 BIllIon that went to the conservatIves made. It Is 4 BIllIon that went to the BIg L bIllIon that went to the BIg Hanksm bIllIon that went to the BIg Hanksm we bIllIon that went to the bIg banks. We could bIllIon that went to the bIg banks. We could rEversej bIllIon that went to the bIg banks. We could rEverse that to take banks. We could rEverse that to take the banks. We could rEverse that to take the tax banks. We could rEverse that to take the Tax Back banks. We could rEverse that to take the Tax Back to banks. We could rEverse that to take the Tax Back to 2015. L to take the Tax Back to 2015. That to take the Tax Back to 2015. That would to take the Tax Back to 2015. That would be to take the Tax Back to 2015. That would be a to take the Tax Back to 2015. That would be a bIg to take the Tax Back to 2015. That would be a bIg part to take the Tax Back to 2015. That would be a bIg part of. To take the Tax Back to 2015. That would be a bIg part of our spendIng that would be a bIg part of our spendIng proposals. That would be a bIg part of our spendIng proposals. And that would be a bIg part of our spendIng proposals. And at. That would be a bIg part of our| spendIng proposals. And at the otHer spendIng proposals. And at the otHer was spendIng proposals. And at the otHer was the spendIng proposals. And at the otHer was the Reform SpendIng proposals. And at the otHer was the reform of spendIng proposals. And at the otHer was the reform of capItal| otHer was the reform of CapItal GaIns otHer was the reform of capItal GaIns Tax otHer was the reform of CapItal RaIns tax. , otHer was the reform of CapItal RaIns tax. 3.. ~ otHer was the reform of CapItal RaIns tax. ,.. ~. otHer was the reform of capItal GaIns Tax GaIns Tax. Lets look at some otHer taxes GaIns Tax. Lets look at some otHer taxes wIth GaIns Tax. Lets look at some otHer taxes wIth thIs GaIns Tax. Lets look at some otHer taxes wIth thIs budget | otHer taxes wIth thIs budget around the corner. InHerItance tax, would you put that up . H0. Tax, would you put that up . No, I thInk tHere tax, would you put that up . No, I thInk tHere Is tax, would you put that up . No, I thInk tHere Is a tax, would you put that up . No, I thInk tHere Is a case tax, would you put that up . No, I thInk tHere Is a case for reformIng I thInk tHere Is a case for reformIng InHerItance I thInk tHere Is a case for. ReformIng InHerItance Tax. CuttIng reformIng InHerItance Tax. CuttIng It . ReformIng InHerItance Tax. CuttIng It . ReformIng InHerItance Tax. CuttIng It . ReformIng InHerItance Tax. CuttIn It .. CuttIng It . Let me explaIn. I thInk reformIng CuttIng It . Let me explaIn. I thInk reformIng It CuttIng It . Let me explaIn. I thInk reformIng It would CuttIng It . Let me explaIn. I. ThInk reformIng It would mean that people thInk reformIng It would mean that people who thInk reformIng It would mean that people who are thInk reformIng It would mean that people who are on thInk reformIng It would meanl that people who are on modest levels that people who are on modest levels of that people who are on modest levels of InHerItance, that people who are on modest levels of InHerItance, a that people who are on modest levels of InHerItance, a lot that people who are on modest levels of InHerItance, a lot of l levels of InHerItance, a lot of peoples levels of InHerItance, a lot of peoples homes levels of InHerItance, a lot of peoples homes In levels of InHerItance, a lot of peoples homes In many levels of InHerItance, a lot of. Peoples homes In many areas levels of InHerItance, a lot of peoples homes In many areas of the country peoples homes In many areas of the country are peoples homes In many areas of the country are quIte peoples homes In many areas of the country are quIte valuable. The country are quIte valuable. And they the country are quIte valuable. And they end the country are quIte valuable. And they end up the country are quIte valuable. And they end up beIng the country are quIte valuable. And they end up beIng clobbered by InHerItance and they end up beIng clobbered by InHerItance Tax and they end up beIng clobbered by InHerItance Tax and and they end up beIng clobbered by InHerItance Tax and I and they end up beIng clobbered by InHerItance Tax and I thInk by InHerItance Tax and I thInk that by InHerItance Tax and I thInk that Is by InHerItance Tax and I thInk that Is In by InHerItance Tax and I thInk that Is In faIr. By InHerItance Tax and I thInk that Is In faIr. Because by InHerItance Tax and I thInk that Is In faIr. Because If by InHerItance Tax and I thInk that Is In faIr. Because If you| that Is In faIr. Because If you look that Is In faIr. Because If you look on that Is In faIr. Because If you look on the that Is In faIr. Because If you look on the flIp that Is In faIr. Because If you look on the flIp sIde, that Is In faIr. Because If you look on the flIp sIde, people | look on the flIp sIde, people who look on the flIp sIde, people who are look on the flIp sIde, people who are InHerItIng look on the flIp sIde, people who are InHerItIng huge look on the flIp sIde, people who are InHerItIng huge amounts of money who are InHerItIng huge amounts of money often who are InHerItIng huge amounts of money often are who are InHerItIng huge amounts of money often are able who are InHerItIng huge amounts of money often are able through| of money often are able through clEver of money often are able through ClEver Tax of money often are able through clEver Tax PlannIng of money often are able through clEver Tax PlannIng to of money often are able through clEver Tax PlannIng to avoId clEver Tax PlannIng to avoId InHerItance clEver Tax PlannIng to avoId InHerItance Tax. ClEver Tax PlannIng to avoId InHerItance Tax. I clEver Tax PlannIng to avoId InHerItance Tax. I would clEver Tax PlannIng to avoId | InHerItance Tax. I would lIke to see InHerItance Tax. I would lIke to see reform InHerItance Tax. I would lIke to see reform that InHerItance Tax. I would lIke to see reform that Is InHerItance Tax. I would lIke to see reform that Is more. To see reform that Is more faIr, to see reform that Is more faIr, frankly. To see reform that Is more faIr, frankly. FaIr, frankly. So, Ed Davey talkIn faIr, frankly. So, Ed Davey talkIng about faIr, frankly. So, Ed Davey talkIng about lIve faIr, frankly. So, Ed Davey talkIng about lIve demo I faIr, frankly. So, Ed Davey I talkIng about lIve Demo Ideas on tax tHere because that Is InterestIng because the seats that Ed Davey Is targetIng and has won are mostly conservatIve seats. ArchIe, back wIth you, they are very clear about thIs, arent