, the president , by the way, compares with a hot war, look will not. We will have bread hot war, as in ukraine , in fact, we are just like, uh, you can start with you, look. Here it seems to me epoch e, also for many people. Im not my opinion. Now i say the era of large farms. She never passed. In the early nineties, we had such a story that everyone suddenly wanted to become farmers. Lets give away latifundia to those who have a small piece, sell somewhere there, and in the end it turned out that everyone up to the west lives a little, otherwise. Yes, perhaps this is a private trader who has some kind of land, but this is essentially enterprise, and we are now talking about the fact that this collective farm system that existed in the soviet union is not unique. Yes, it may be slightly different in terms of the level of ownership, but one person has two hectares of land to feed himself with what you can, but if you earn money by business. Probably because , well, i was with you for example. Uh, i went last year. E your mspk. Well, yes, indeed , this is such a classic. Here, and the quality of the soviet put on. Thats all great. Its a wonderfully good road. And at the same time i. Order i understand that all this is earned on earth. Although everyone says that we have it unprofitable. Well, probably some kind of a break in consciousness arises if it is unprofitable from somewhere such and such is taken. Our agriculture is unprofitable , or you can earn. I absolutely agree with you that when they began to divide the land, e. G. To our small farmers, it turned out that many of them, in fact, could not stand it and the lands began to become desolated and overgrown, and large commercial farms. Uh, ill say by my example at dawn, then uh hmm yes, there were failures of the nineties there were years when there was some kind of vacillation, but now we are getting stable results and people are living. Uh, they always get a decent salary on time. Well, our enterprise is profitable and most importantly, your question is still profitable or not, ill tell you , so if you work with your soul on earth, then there will always be a profit, regardless of whether the rainy year is not rainy, but the profit will be why because, lets say , for example, our economy we have a lot of branch economy we grow. Uh, starting from traditional cereal crops there rapeseed beets, we have orchards. We have fish with us. Ah, animal husbandry. We have good results, so uh, we have no losses. No listen, he even keep a greenhouse that you have warm. This is understandable, thats all. Well, not not not cheap history to support. But ill still be back. Here , Sergei Vladimirovich , you nodded your head so skeptically when kirill said that the whole of belarus is, in fact, a zone of risky land. I also agree with this somewhat, because we give, yes, examples also in the sternum region. Well, the Western Region of our country is traditional there, in principle, everything is stable, they are new assistants. My result yes, but i think that now the vitebsk region, in principle, will get to work more powerfully. So heres the point of view. Here is a man of science, roughly speaking, and how do you evaluate the belarusian lands . And uh, we talk a lot about climate change, so were growing new crops now. Yes, we are shifting our focus to Something Else. Thats from your point of view, and hmm our country now. Well, what does it look like, and if you take a sonder , risky farming, well, more precisely, africa yes, there are zones of risky farming, and then they manage, er, to get exactly to miss some of their crops. Why drip irrigation everywhere there are scientific achievements scientific point of view or a technological issue or an effort issue and everywhere there are crops that want to grow on one soil or another now belarus is a small country, but the cut across climatic zones is quite large. This is from grodno from the south southeast to the north northwest on five zones stand out completely for the climate of the republic of belarus and because of this, you know, we cannot change the climate. Well, because no one can change it. If someone tried and it turned out he would, uh, own the whole world, we cant change the earth. God gave it to us. We cannot change the people. God gave it to us, too, everything that we have and our achievements. All this is only scientific method, every crop that is cultivated in agriculture. It is designed for one type of soil for new climatic conditions, what is bad in the north uhhuh in the south. The good thing is that the varieties, and you understand now, the varietal composition went to the northern zone of southern crops, the varietal composition went. The composition of the same corn, of course, and the direction is something that obviously cannot grow on the same land. There to sow meaning. No, it will just be a translation of the products. I still disagree a little with you that we cannot change the climate. Yes . For example, i was in the stolin region. There are greenhouses there. Yes, there are such dictators. I understand that there, well, there really are hectares under glass, almost computer technology, drip irrigation. Eh, the computer itself distributes when to water what, and this is belarus and this is really a history that you want to be proud of, and most importantly, they do it. Well, they changed it, yes, and it comes back, yes, to the question. You say agriculture. Well, some question is more economic clear. Yes, a and we somehow, probably, 3 years ago in connection with wellknown events. And thus, by the crisis of the twentieth year, they also understood that history is political. Well why is the state investing a lot of money in the development of agriculture. This is an industry in fact, as if for us such a titular one and one that we are proud of, but individual figures. We remember we made a name for ourselves, on which we did elementary without a host. The style that they traveled around the country and, as it were, demonstrated to the general public, passing it off as a trend maxim vyacheslavovich, the president says a lot that mismanagement is, as it were, our main enemy, in fact, and those people who do it they are, well, traitors for our country, namely the people who are here. Eh , they are so careless about their work and their activities, as the situation has changed recently, but it is obvious that they began to talk a lot, and at the highest level. Yes, Pay Attention to this, some checks are carried out. Here you identify more or less of these cases. And in particular. Thats always yes. The cleaning company often talked about the same fuel and the same equipment, how we are now with this situation. Well, its no secret that the general Prosecutors Office bodies of the countrys Prosecutors Office, on behalf of the head of state, provide prosecutorial supervision over the observance of the law in the field of Agricultural Production by the prosecutor general. Uh, given orders to carry out specific activities, including uh, and this year with a trip to the fields prosecutors will check. How do we ensure legislation in the conduct of agricultural work. Today is harvesting wednesday. Its still going, uh, however , we can draw preliminary conclusions that hmm , order is being restored in the country from year to year fewer are found. E, violations of the offenses are e, minor e is not systemic in nature and was promptly eliminated at the request of the prosecutors. Im asking specifically now. Yes, more often they steal or more often attribute. Thats what they suffer from. Here, just to understand. Our grain was stolen from us , diesel fuel was taken away and not credited. Thats what we suffer from. In our country, in accordance with the current legislation, there are two types of theft, yes, petty and criminally punishable theft. If a bucket of grain was taken away. I understand that most likely they will intoxicate, but thats why we can say that the parity in these offenses is respected and naturally. In my opinion. E more e significant harm is oddly enough, postscript. Thats because only hmm, based on those reliable data from the actual situation in this or that industry, including in the agricultural industry, those people who , uh, authorized to make decisions, will do this correctly, taking into account the actual and real situation. H begins the wife of the information that is provided this is his subordinates and his employees. And if they provide some kind of, well, an untruthful fake picture, it is better to paint that he will not be able to effectively decide on you, how is your area cut off from the world with this problem. In principle, i own the entire situation in the stolbtsovskaya district of agriculture, therefore, to deceive anyone. Its hard enough, though. Unfortunately , such facts, but they are extremely rare lately, are sometimes present and not even because people want to look better. Through this postscript, because there is inattention in reporting and something was put in the wrong place, in fact, a vivid example. If it was possible to tell that inattention is attributed. We even started talking about the fact that agriculture is still a profitable business, once you begin to count inattentively. You seem to be losing your money, listen. Lets give an example of the latest fresh after uh, beautification meeting, re check. Go troll and the grain and awl complex one of our farms is worth two 6 years not used reporting column states that they will participate will not participate. Here they put two of them, they didnt plan to participate, but they put in that they would participate and put two serviceable ones. That is, it was not a desire. Uhhuh , do not do it and show that the specialist at his level made a mistake. Rozcontrol has revealed fairly. We did not try to clarify these points at all. I later noted for myself that if you dont come up now, in principle, the same specialist in the following will do the same mistake, and today already under the remedy. Lets just say that the order and, in principle, by the state control committee this will be stored in memory for a long time and will allow us to avoid the next one. And so, in general, at the stage of checking some obvious facts , no additions were established at all throughout the country of your these lands. Kormyansky nesvizh, stolbtsovsky district. This piece is most often considered very fruitful, there are really big crops, there are always examples. Here. Uh, you basically look at the neighbors when you feel that you have the land is different. Well, to understand. Heres how to manage it, but the land where the harvest is more dependent on people, or is it still called god gave or, for example, where it did not spoil. Well, you already know. Uh, the science of Technology Selection has stepped so far forward that today it is difficult to attribute everything to the linear factor. That is, we have learned to work with the weather and work in these conditions. Well, the stolbtsovsky district is divided into two parts the south, and the north, lets call the south, its closer to it, where we get, of course, much better results today from the Fields Department what appreciates will not go away, despite the drought, but there is also the north, where we have a large forest cover there, when the construction estimate is 26 points. Well, of course, its hard to get 100 centners there, but 35 from there. They are probably worth the same start, so we provide you with a good one. Well, this way. Thats all the same. Here you are talking about what happens accident and human fact maksimovich, i still come to you, as a man of the law of facts, because it seems to me that this is rather an exception. E more often people go to postscripts absolutely consciously. Yes, definitely a little, maybe perhaps even the substitution of concepts occurred in december of the twentysecond year of the council of ministers. E, prepared and did not know the resolution in accordance with which by july, by the eighth of july, the twentytwo twentythird year, all agricultural enterprises, e organizations of the authority and management in the field of agriculture, had to take security measures. The readiness of equipment is 95 . Here. Well, we were told that indeed the human factor misunderstood the task. We planned to use it, but in fact we they really planned to use the equipment, but on the eighth day on the control date of the means of the event, well , it happens a little in the wrong state, and during verification activities, including the state control committee , it was found that it was faulty. And how then to call the situation in the miokarsky district of the vitebsk region, where fortyseven combine harvesters were successfully reported, and during prosecutorial checks it was established that there were practically no 47 a 37 of them. E, attributed reported. Heres what i was saying earlier, those bodies of people who are authorized decisionmaking is not reliable information. As they say for those who are in the tank, and if we are talking about the fact that there is some kind of equipment. Yes, and here it is not enough, but objectively, in order to clean up some areas there, well, relatively speaking, it is not enough. Well, you can say so, raise the question above yes, and probably somehow decide with other authorities so that this cleaning equipment is moved from another area. Well, that is, it turns out that this is a postscript, but they deliberately harm themselves like this their issue would be resolved. And so it turns out. Its just on paper, but in fact, well, we suffer with what we have, right . What is the motivation of these people . Well, why . Well, its probably a 7 minute benefit, which avoids some criticism. Well, not in the past, probably not a bonus, including, perhaps, a bonus, but in my opinion, right now at this moment she solves one 7minute problem the absence of any claims from the higher management, which should and has the right to reproach for why not by the conditional date was prepared was not ensured the serviceability of this technique . The goal was simply not scolded. And whats next . Well, the pursuit of a common goal is then some kind of tourist, but from a negative point of view, that is, a person does not think about the result, but thinks about how not to get a hat. Yes, thats right, Sergei Anatolyevich how are things going with you and what is your opinion on yourself about what is still worse than postscript, er, or theft . If in general you can say, taking into account humor, is there a fight . A they didnt deliver cartridges or shells on time, but need to fight. We are partly somewhere the human factor in this plays a person. Still a mechanic. It is necessary to repair the harvester to the head. Know what will fix it. Maybe some kind of belt somewhere in time. They did not deliver, which depends on the qualifications, of a specialist who is first checked by these combines. This is also quite important, but how much the level of yes and how much this or that mechanism or changed can be said, some spare part will affect this combine, which should really participate in the work. Many harvesters can leave to work, but we have a principled approach, a tough approach. We approach it fundamentally so that the harvester will not only really come out, but can really work for 2030 days, without major breakdowns , without major problems, in order to realize that it will really withstand its load. See Sergei Anatolyevich and here is a question for me, which again is born in the minds of our liberals. Well, maybe then the state does not need to engage in agriculture. After all, the private trader understands that if i withdraw 20 cars, i will remove this one. Harvest, if my 20 cars are broken, then i just wont remove it, and in this case i dont need to attribute anything. I will not receive, profit. I will not pay people, i am again a question, maybe rhetorical, but on the one hand. Yes. This enterprise is a large enterprise of agriculture. Its such a big chunk of the economy that its profitable. On the other hand, well , the same questions arise when the prosecutors interfere in this process. So there may be something left unfinished, but if frankly, e states according to the state. We today we are approaching and in general the state approach is probably the most correct way in our republic today. Firstly, we have diverse types of the earth, we have a lot of more than 800 farmers who occupy a narrow direction. They are entitled. They are entitled to a lot. They do their thing too. They are trying to work on the earth, it is worth a lot and we respect the work of any peasant who works with us in the fields, because we provide food security, and the Prosecutors Office, as always, is a mouse. We live and always know from those years, probably old. When it was possible to play something somewhere somewhere. And today it helps us and somewhere on the contrary to prove to people that we need to come to what we need to do today. It is necessary to clearly understand if it is faulty, it is better to clearly understand today how to fix it. Theme, not how to avoid consequences. This is where the essence is. They are good fellows, they help us in something, i can add a little bit according to the statistics. We have ah codes of the earth. Yes, uh has to guess that any man later to be a farmer with an education specialized. Yes, whatever you want. Well , yes, of course, for this very thing. Well, you know , so that something goes a lot. Here is a furberry, yes, you can take it, and you can take land from equipment leasing. Can i take a collective farm, can i buy it . Yes , you can take a village, you can dig up what is behind the legislation. Here, the house of representatives gave everything to everyone, but in the end, last year it was milk. Yes, only 2 of the farmer has his own in general and the dragging of our milk and meat, 2 , 7 for granulation in lavash up to 20 , this is thanks. So they said to sell their products very. Its hard to understand the strategy in minsk , we have such that you cant open some kind of social network everywhere farm products. Yes , and they say, listen, well, we connected anyway , we know that they are chickens, for example, even at any poultry farm, and the poultry farm is most often connected to the pc in some way. They are sitting there on some medicines, but we have farmers cheese and farmers milk , you will come to the market, it is four times more expensive there. And what is this , uh, still an exaggerated story, it takes place , you know, if ours was something there antibiotics or lowquality meat, we would not have exported 8. 5 billion. Yes, where they are with their hands and feet, well, more than 100 of our products are taken away, namely more than 1,000 items of dairy products. Only yes, more than 100 countries of the world, and we will spoil it all, therefore, the price and quality. Everywhere you will try the belarusian one, where only the state sells its products, or you have some kind of direct deliveries abroad, no, but considering that if milk and meat, then we han