truth-telling that we would like to have. secondly, there's probably a danger of putting sources and methods at risk although that can actually be resolved through redaction. we'll see if that happens. and then finally over here, chris, you've got the whole question of precedent. look, this fisa process is very closely held. it's actually more classified than most of the things that i touched as director of either agency. it's kind of its own sacred ground because, i mean, this is very sensitive stuff. you're talking about the privacy of americans. and so it's a closed universe between intelligence professionals and the american court system. and now we're going to open that universe and insert what, by anyone's definition, has to be an intensely political process. that's really a bad precedent. >> general, give me a quick yes-no, other than -- i did a little research. other than bay of pigs and kennedy in terms of when he didn't listen the second time