is that he will bring arguments, factual arguments. now, they may be good arguments, they may be bad arguments. but a judge may say, look, i don't have resources to test these arguments. i don't have, you know, a border security. one of the, you know, tremendous advantages a president has here is that he is usually the arbitrator of what's in the national security interest, what's an emergency. and there will be many judges, not all of them, but many judges who will say, i'm not second-guessing the president of the united states what's a national security emergency. >> jeff toobin -- >> anderson, can i comment here really quick? >> yeah, sure. >> the courts have -- to drive jeffrey's point home, the courts defer more to the executive branch in national security areas, in exercise of emergency powers, where congress has given them those powers on confidentiality of elements of secret -- government secrecy, than in other areas, than in environmental regulations or