initially defended this story and then put out a statement that kind of blamed jackie and then took it back. so not exactly owning up to clearly we used to say the story was flawed. i think the story is just utterly blown up. >> and what i liked most about the reporting at the "washington post" was that's real reporting. they looked under every stone every corner and they really just tore that story apart. and by doing basic reporting. nothing here is rocket science. this is just going and doing your job. and why "rolling stone" feels that -- makes me question everything else that has ever been printed in that magazine. we don't want to interrupt the narrative, the narrative is more important that be the facts. p that's troubling because it underminds our credibility. >> this was a huge mistake and a long time and "rolling stone" still has not owned up to it. thanks very much for stopping by. after the break, hillary tees