report -- does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him. there's been a big debate, first of all, whether it was appropriate to put that in, and secondly, whether the attorney general should have put it out there. but certainly, he had to make -- >> well, i think the attorney general did it because he had to make an explanation. it is not the job of a prosecutor under normal circumstances to exonerate, right? their job is to either have a charge or not. what it sounds like the special counsel did -- i have not seen the report -- was list facts all of which were known publicly, did not make a legal determination as to what that would constitute or not constitute and, rather, took it to the department of justice under the office of legal counsel, the deputy attorney general and the attorney general which, by the way, is exactly the way it's supposed to happen. that's because bob mueller as special counsel was an employee of the department of justice and