involved militarily in syria including arming the resistance and beyond. what does it do to mitt romney's position as an authority on foreign policy, as somebody who could be commander in chief, to have john mccain, still the guy holding the republican party's banner on this? >> i don't think it does much because romney, the few things he said about foreign policy, the few positions he has articulated, he's going for the i'm going to be as hawkish as possible. he's trying to duck the syria questions. you have mccain being more p proactive there. but what he said about iran, romney basically saying i want the military option on the table, i don't want anybody holding me back. my israel policy is go to be the opposite of obamas. so the theme is from romney is to strike a hawkish note, and i think what he's trying to go for is this carktuicature of obama t