Environmental Groups Voluntarily Dismiss Their Untimely Chal

Environmental Groups Voluntarily Dismiss Their Untimely Challenge to "Part B" CCR Rule Revisions | Troutman Pepper


As previously
reported, a coalition of environmental groups recently filed a petition for review in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals (D.C. Circuit) challenging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) recent final rule titled, “Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System: Disposal of CCR; A Holistic Approach to Closure Part B: Alternate Demonstration for Unlined Surface Impoundments,” 85 Fed. Reg. 72,506 (Nov. 12, 2020). Commonly called “Part B,” the rule allows owners and operators to submit demonstrations showing their clay-lined impoundments are adequately protective of human health and the environment.
The environmental groups filed the petition, however, outside the 90-day timeframe in which parties may seek review of regulations promulgated under RCRA. 42 U.S.C. § 6976(a)(1). In light of their untimeliness, on February 25, the environmental groups filed a

Related Keywords

, Us Environmental Protection Agency , Dc Circuit Court , Protection Agency , Solid Waste Management System , Holistic Approach , Alternate Demonstration , Unlined Surface Impoundments , Holly Hill , டச் சுற்று நீதிமன்றம் , திட கழிவு மேலாண்மை அமைப்பு , முழுமையான அணுகுமுறை , மாற்று ஆர்ப்பாட்டம் , ஹோலி மலை ,

© 2025 Vimarsana