In Fitbit, Inc. v. Valencell, Inc., IPR2017-00319, Paper 73 (Apr. 5, 2021), on remand from the Federal Circuit, the Board determined the patentability of several previously omitted dependent claims and found them unpatentable as obvious. Fitbit petitioned for Inter partes review of Valencell's patent directed to a method of generating data output containing physiological and motion-related information, arguing that several of its claims were obvious. In its original Final Written Decision, the Board found the patent's sole independent claim to be obvious. But the Board refused to consider the obviousness argument of several dependent claims because, in the Board's view, the obviousness challenge of