Federal Circuit Invalidates Means-Plus-Function Claims For C

Federal Circuit Invalidates Means-Plus-Function Claims For Computer-Implemented Inventions - Intellectual Property


To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Functional claim language—which defines an invention by
what it does rather than what it is—can be a powerful claim
drafting tool when used carefully. For example, functional language
may be advantageous for computer-implemented inventions that are
characterized with reference to logical components instead of
physical hardware. 35 U.S.C. § 112(f) (formerly §
112¶ 6) expressly permits the use of functional claiming and
is traditionally invoked by the phrase "means for"
followed by a functional modifier. But even when the term
"means" is not used, other terms that are not understood

Related Keywords

Samsung Elecs , Rain Computing Inc , Samsung , Synchronoss Technologies Inc , Citrix Online , Federal Circuit , Synchronoss Technologies , Brain Computing , மழை கணினி இன்க் , சாம்சங் , சிட்ரிக்ஸ் நிகழ்நிலை , கூட்டாட்சியின் சுற்று , மழை கணினி ,

© 2025 Vimarsana