We receive those, we will consider them. And if they meet the legal bar, then we will absolutely revoke and expel them and the first case is already under consideration in. In other news, to danger to life, weather warnings have been issued in england in the wake of storm babet severe flood alerts are in place around the river idle near retford in nottinghamshire, which is expected to reach record levels. The number of people who have died during the storm has risen to four after police found the body of 83 year old Maureen Gilbert in chesterfield , gilbert in chesterfield, Manchester United has opened a book of condolence at old trafford following the death of sir bobby charlton, the legendary footballer was a key member of englands World Cup Winning Team in 1966. Floral tributes and football shirts are being placed outside the Manchester United stadium with his former club saying hell always be remembered as a giant of the game. This is gb news of the game. This is gb news across the uk on tv, in your car, on Digital Radio and on your Smart Speaker by saying play gb news now its back to free speech nation. Free speech nation. There are calls for jihad on the streets of london. A swiss man is imprisoned for fat shaming , and man is imprisoned for fat shaming, and j. K. Rowling says shell be happy to serve time for misgendering. This is free speech nation. Welcome to free speech nation. Welcome to free speech nation with me andrew doyle. Well, this is the show where we take a look at culture, Current Affairs and politics and coming up on the show tonight, carol decker from tpau be carol decker from tpau will be here to discuss her memorable music career and the time she here to discuss her memorable muscancelledind the time she here to discuss her memorable muscancelled for the time she here to discuss her memorable muscancelled for saying1e she got cancelled for saying welsh was language. Ill be was a foreign language. Ill be joined professor who claims joined by a professor who claims he were he has new evidence. Were simply characters an advanced simply characters in an advanced virtual terrifying virtual world. Its terrifying stuff. And lawyer Dennis Kavanagh will be here to discuss the governments expected u turn on a ban on conversion therapy. And course, got and of course, ive got a fantastic here answering fantastic panel here answering questions from the studio audience and panel tonight audience and my panel tonight are nick dixon and are comedians nick dixon and steve allen, who well , welcome. Steve allen, who well, welcome. How are you, nick . How are you, nick . What have you been up to . What have you been up to . Ive literally just been working here. Youre here all the time. Youre here all the time. Almost every day. And then a few days. Im not. I just lie at home very still. Is that better or worse and is that better or worse than previous life . Than your previous life . Better. But i still find much better. But i still find ways to complain about it. Thats the impressive thing. Its skill. Its an impressive skill. Steve . You how about you, steve . Are you well . How about you, steve . Are you welmainly a child is mainly raising a child is what i do these days. Thats the problem. When you have those. It, have one of those. Thats it, isnt its game over. Isnt it . And its game over. Is constant. They they it is constant. They they i mean, hes 19 months now. Still hasnt learned to drive. Thats ridiculous. Its taken ridiculous. So yeah, its taken a while. Okay, some them are okay, well, some of them are slow but anyway, lets slow learners. But anyway, lets get questions from our get some questions from our lovely one lovely audience. Our first one comes alan, where alan . Comes from alan, where is alan . Hello, comes from alan, where is alan . Hel hi ladies. Comes from alan, where is alan . Helhi ladies. Oh, god. Hi there, ladies. Oh, god. Sorry. Thats outrageous, isnt it . Well, my question is , why it . Well, my question is, why are the met police so relaxed about the calls for jihad in the streets of london . Yeah, this was a disturbing video that went viral. And this was part of the march for palestine. Up to 100,000 people palestine. Up to 100,000 people were there. That was in london. But it was the video of a group there called hizb ut tahrir. And they well, certainly a member of they well, certainly a member of the group was calling for jihad. The group was calling for jihad. And then the police were contacted about it. And the contacted about it. And the police claimed that this wasnt a call violence. Well, lets a call for violence. Well, lets have look at the clip. Have a look at the clip. First one is the solution to liberate people in the concentration on palestine concentration camps on palestine jihad. What is the solution. Jihad. What is the solution. Neil kinnock. Well, kwasi dup neil kinnock. Well, kwasi dup sabina nessa you kwasi europol facing in the way of allah. Those who fight you, the zionist entity, has a military. They have a police force, they have a judiciary , they have an opponent judiciary, they have an opponent , an Army Fighting , killing, an Army Fighting, killing, massacring our people. Islam massacring our people. Islam saying jihad fisabilillah that the muslim armies move to rescue the muslim armies move to rescue the people of palestine. And the people of palestine. And thatis the people of palestine. And that is the solution that oh, okay. So , nick, i mean, hes so, nick, i mean, hes definitely calling for using words like army, the word jihad. Words like army, the word jihad. I mean, a lot of people have pointed out that when hizb tahrir, a group that are banned in many arab countries, when they Start Talking about jihad, you should concerned. You should be concerned. Mean, the police yeah, i mean, the Police Issued this ridiculous statement. Jihad statement. The word jihad has a number meanings, so its number of meanings, but so its like type of flower. Yeah, like this type of flower. Yeah, yeah. Mean, this is not yeah. I mean, this is not a religious book study group, you know its like we know what i mean . Its like we know what i mean . Its like we know meaning. Mean, he know the meaning. I mean, he said is jihad said the only solution is jihad by armies of muslim by the armies of the muslim countries. So i dont think its that ambiguous. Made it very clear that guys made it very clear hes made it clear. Hes made it very clear. The only the only argument you might have is like, is it incitement . If hes inspiring foreign perhaps not foreign armies, perhaps its not immediate the immediate incitement on the streets thats streets of london. Thats the only technicality think only technicality i can think of. Is completely absurd. I mean, the question comes down free speech issue, down to a free speech issue, doesnt it . Because i do believe in i think need in free speech. I think you need to cut it very fine, like harassment, inciting men to violence already illegal. Violence is already illegal. But i what qualifies i think what qualifies as harassment to be harassment to violence has to be a pretty high threshold, doesnt harassment to violence has to be a pdo y high threshold, doesnt harassment to violence has to be a pdo you gh threshold, doesnt harassment to violence has to be a pdo you think eshold, doesnt harassment to violence has to be a pdo you think thisld, doesnt harassment to violence has to be a pdo you think this qualifies . It . Do you think this qualifies . Mean, as nick just well, i mean, as nick just said, the many said, the defence is the many definitions the word jihad, definitions of the word jihad, which just following which could just mean following the god, i believe. But the rule of god, i believe. But then like to tie someone then phrases like to tie someone up has different meanings. And if going pop if i said, im going to pop round your and tie you up, round your house and tie you up, i might not mean give you a lot of you might not so of papennork. You might not so yousounds like an offer to me. Sounds like an offer to me. Sounds like an offer to me. It does. But either way, its incitement for something. I know what mean. Has to be what you mean. The bar has to be set but at time, the set high, but at a time, the context the context is the context is the context is the thing. Yeah. And the timing is part that context well. Part of that context as well. Yeah. In america they have well, in america they have the brandenburg test, which determines whether something classifies as inciting to violence. That violence. And the point of that is about imminency. You is its about imminency. You know, has to you and do know, it has to be you go and do this now. Now, talking this thing now. Now, talking to a crowd already fired a crowd who are already fired up, et cetera. So its very clear over there, but its less clear over there, but its less clear over there, but its less clear over here. Do you think that people that that these people like that should what they should be able to say what they want streets . Mean, want on the streets . I mean, youre i presume . Youre for protest, i presume . Protest to an well, im for protest to an extent. Mean, i got in extent. I mean, i got in trouble. Someone was telling me off because i said, if off recently because i said, if you flag, you you have a hamas flag, you probably shouldnt be in the country. Were saying, country. And people were saying, well, nick, i thought you were a free this group free speech, but this is a group that wipe out the that wants to wipe out the entire is line entire west. There is a line for me, not palestine flag, me, its not a palestine flag, but theres a big but hamas flag. So theres a big difference. I think its difference. And i think its become almost a cliche, but people of two people are sick of the two tiered system. Tiered justice system. I mean, we a lady got we had a lady who was got a visit the police for taking visit from the police for taking a of sticker was a photo of a sticker that was like a gender critical sticker. Yeah. Visit yeah. Kelly j. Keane got a visit for untoward for being, quote, untoward board about so and then we have about a. So and then we have a guy the guy shouting for jihad on the streets, are streets, and the police are like, lets him like, well, lets hear him out. Its like, well, thats and its like, well, thats kind of kind of important kind of thats kind of important as double standards kind of thats kind of important as to double standards kind of thats kind of important as to this, ble standards kind of thats kind of important as to this, whichmdards element to this, which is actually really, really important, you know . Kate scottow important, you know . Kate scottwof child, into front of a child, thrown into a cell calling a man, a man, cell for calling a man, a man, a man who identifies woman, man who identifies as a woman, a man. Would suggest that man. Now, i would suggest that if are going to be if the police are going to be policing offensive this policing offensive speech, this would qualify, wouldnt it . Yes, there who are there are lots of people who are offended by this. Yes. But i dont think you would. Make that would. Well, you make that point, think youd would. Well, you make that pointthe think youd would. Well, you make that pointthe police think youd would. Well, you make that pointthe police to. Hink youd would. Well, you make that pointthe police to police ud would. Well, you make that pointthe police to police every want the police to police every single word that everyone says. Saying is, i dont what im saying is, though, way they are though, that the way they are currently doing its currently doing it, its hypocrisy. Just hypocrisy. Its not just hypocrisy. Its not just hypocrisy. As hypocrisy. It comes across as having ideological having a kind of ideological drive know, drive of a kind of, you know, well certain they well do certain things if they if they go along with our beliefs things that dont. dont. Its not about the maybe its not about the ideology. What ideology. Its about what the next fear the next step will be. They fear the next step will be. They fear the next if you go around next step. So if you go around and someone did and ask someone like, why did you a sticker you take a picture of a sticker on theres not going on a poster, theres not going to be a huge protest. The next day, but maybe worry about to be a huge protest. The next dayjconsequences worry about to be a huge protest. The next dayjconsequences whatrabout to be a huge protest. The next dayjconsequences what would. The consequences of what would have arrested have happened if they arrested people have happened if they arrested peoi le they probably were i think they probably were very the consequences. I think cant yes, i think the police cant contain they know contain it and they dont know what to do. And also, its embarrassing the embarrassing for sort of the ruling through mass ruling elite who is through mass immigration, kind ruling elite who is through mass imthings,on, kind ruling elite who is through mass imthings, but kind ruling elite who is through mass imthings, but they kind ruling elite who is through mass imthings, but they dont kind of things, but they dont want to and very uncomfortable. All so they there arent a lot the people theyre part lot of the people theyre part of that crowd are british. Yeah, probably. I what do we do . You know, i dont know. But it become kind of it has become this kind of anarcho it, anarcho tyranny now, hasnt it, where basically law where you punish basically law abiding for example, for abiding people for example, for taking of a sticker and taking a photo of a sticker and you punish crime and this you dont punish crime and this is what people call a narco tyranny. Makes tyranny. And this is what makes people so furious. Well, its almost Police Almost as though the police dont to apply the law dont know how to apply the law in certain cases. Saw a police i mean, we saw a Police Account the day account on twitter the other day claiming someone claiming that calling someone a mean against the law. Mean name is against the law. And isnt. It just isnt. And and it isnt. It just isnt. And even i know that, you know, because people to me. Because people do that to me. All twitter. Can all the time on twitter. Can i get . Because that get them arrested . Because that would actually really help. It get them arrested . Because that would clean. Ly really help. It get them arrested . Because that would clean. Ly realltimeline. Would clean up my timeline. You yeah. People do that to you here, though, as they do. Were doing thats true. You were doing it you . Okay. Thats true. You were doing it get you . Okay. Thats true. You were doing it get another you . Okay. Thats true. You were doing it get another questioniy. Thats true. You were doing it get another question now lets get another question now from roger . From roger. Where is roger . Hello. From roger. Where is roger . Helhes rowling going to prison. Well, i do hope not. Its a good way to focus the mind, though, as a writer gives you lots i mean, jeffrey lots of time. I mean, Jeffrey Archer came out with a book when he was in prison, didnt he . So you pretty well, you know, its a pretty well, i dont she emulates him dont think she emulates him particularly. Would dont think she emulates him particulthis would dont think she emulates him particulthis is would dont think she emulates him particulthis is because would dont think she emulates him particulthis is because theres say. So this is because theres been big story last week. Been this big story last week. We discussed it on show we discussed it on the show where are implementing. Where labour are implementing. They to toughen up they say they want to toughen up hate that hate crime legislation and that that would causing that would include causing offence people who identify offence to people who identify as genders and critics as different genders and critics are saying, well, this could potentially youre potentially mean that if youre classifying as a classifying misgendering as a hate it does lead to hate crime, it does lead to a two Year Prison Sentence potentially legally. So this is something that critics are something that the critics are saying would saying whether that would actually or not, we dont actually apply or not, we dont know. J. K. Rowling has said, know. Butj. K. Rowling has said, you if she to go to you know, if she needs to go to pnson you know, if she needs to go to prison for two years, be prison for two years, shed be happy this, happy to. If it comes to this, because principle of because its the principle of the thing. Theyre not going to send potter send the author of harry potter to they . Seems to prison, are they . It seems unlikely be amazing. Not because i dont like j. K. Rowling, would rowling, but because it would expose absurdity of the law. Expose the absurdity of the law. Like she get like you say, she you get a decent book out as well. There is but it its kind of is that. But it its kind of like trump moment. Like trump at the moment. Theres gagging theres a theres a gagging order on trump that he couldnt say about. Pence say anything about. Mike pence positive say anything about. Mike pence posiofe say anything about. Mike pence posi ofe opponents the one of his opponents in the primaries. People are primaries. So some people are saying go saying trump should just go to pnson saying trump should just go to prison the then prison to make the point. Then hell get on appeal anyway, hell get out on appeal anyway, probably of hours. Probably in a couple of hours. So went so if j. K. Rowling went to prison, at expose prison, it would at least expose the these laws. And the absurdity of these laws. And what what this at what this law, what this at least idea shows is least proposed idea shows is that, you say it that, once again, you say it cant worse under labour. Cant get worse under labour. Its going be much worse. Its going to be so much worse. Its going to be so much worse. I break it to you. I hate to break it to you. The tories incompetent, tories are incompetent, etcetera, know. Etcetera, etcetera. We all know. But going bring in but labour are going to bring in things which i things like this which just i mean a lot of mean certainly a lot of feminists feel that labour has really against them and really turned against them and is basically an anti woman party at point. At this point. I what do you what do i mean what do you what do you this . You think you think of this . Do you think its likely that kind of its likely that these kind of legislations in . Legislations would come in . A problem with all i got a problem with all the headunes headlines on these stories that i think are misleading. The headune i think are misleading. The headline about the jk one wa