Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com
jurisdictional error. all that remains is that the decision is quashed. so, whether the court will make that decision tomorrow is another story because there are a lot of matters to consider. at the end of the day, the court willjust say this is a nullity. what is interesting is the response from the minister which hasjust interesting is the response from the minister which has just come through now, which shows an extraordinary doubling down, i guess, and makes it very clear that the minister of current affairs doesn't want novak djokovic in the country.— djokovic in the country. from your persoective. _ djokovic in the country. from your persoective. is — djokovic in the country. from your perspective, is that _ djokovic in the country. from your perspective, is that a _ djokovic in the country. from your perspective, is that a political- perspective, is that a political stance? that's about saying we've all had such privations in this country, we can't have someone come in apparentlyjust because they are famous or high profile or particularly important to a certain tournament. i particularly important to a certain tournament-— tournament. i don't think it is a olitical tournament. i don't think it is a political stance. _ tournament. i don't think it is a political stance. it _ tournament. i don't think it is a political stance. it is _ tournament. i don't think it is a political stance. it is a - tournament. i don't think it is a political stance. it is a legal - political stance. it is a legal argument which is basically saying what his lawyers are trying to do is