Invalidation Of Chemical Compound Claims - Intellectual Prop

Invalidation Of Chemical Compound Claims - Intellectual Property


To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Torrent Pharmaceuticals and Indoco Remedies Ltd.
(Defendant-Appellant) appealed from the district court's final
judgment on Takeda's (Plaintiffs-Appellees) invalidity
challenges to claims 4 and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 7,807,689, owned
by Takeda. In a non-precedential opinion, the Federal Circuit
("the Court") affirmed the district court's final
judgment that Torrent and Indoco had failed to prove that the
claims asserted by Takeda were invalid for statutory obviousness or
non-statutory obviousness-type double patenting.
Takeda's patent '689 is listed in the Orange Book as
protecting Takeda' alogliptin benzoate formulations, marketed

Related Keywords

, Torrent Pharmaceuticals , Indoco Remedies Ltd , Indoco Remedies , Federal Circuit , Orange Book , Abbreviated New Drug Application , Mondaq , Invalidation Of Chemical Compound Claims , Energy And Natural Resources , Chemicals , Intellectual Property , Patent , நீரோடை மருந்துகள் , கூட்டாட்சியின் சுற்று , ஆரஞ்சு நூல் , ஆற்றல் மற்றும் இயற்கை வளங்கள் , இரசாயனங்கள் , அறிவுசார் ப்ராபர்டீ , காப்புரிமை ,

© 2025 Vimarsana