PTAB: Discovery Requests Targeting Objective Evidence Of Non

PTAB: Discovery Requests Targeting Objective Evidence Of Nonobviousness Denied Under Garmin Framework - Intellectual Property


To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board denied a patent owner's
motion for additional discovery of documents—from
petitioners, real parties-in-interest, and third
parties—because patent owner failed to show that such
discovery would support a showing of nonobviousness. In
an 
inter partes review (IPR), under 37 C.F.R.
§ 42.51(b)(2), absent agreement of the parties, a moving party
must establish that additional discovery is justified in the
"interests of justice." In making such a determination,
the PTAB considers the five factors articulated in 
Garmin
Int'l, Inc. v. Cuozzo Speed Techs. LLC, IPR 2012-00001,

Related Keywords

, Garmin , Garmin Intl Inc , Patent Trial , Appeal Board , Garmin Int L , கார்மின் , கார்மின் இந்தில் இன்க் , காப்புரிமை சோதனை , முறையீடு பலகை , கார்மின் எண்ணாக ல் ,

© 2025 Vimarsana