Sentencing Law and Policy: Split(?) Sixth Circuit panel clar

Sentencing Law and Policy: Split(?) Sixth Circuit panel clarifies disparity between actual sentence and sentence under current law can be proper compassionate relief factor


Since June 28, 2004
May 7, 2021
Split(?) Sixth Circuit panel clarifies disparity between actual sentence and sentence under current law can be proper compassionate relief factor
I have been pleased to be able to blog about a significant number of significant circuit rulings on the reach and application of the sentence modification provisions amended by the federal FIRST STEP Act.  As regular readers know, in lots of (pre-COVID) prior posts, I made much of the provision of the FIRST STEP Act allowing federal courts to directly reduce sentences under the (so-called compassionate release) statutory provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) without awaiting a motion by the Bureau of Prisons.  I have long considered this provision a big deal because, if applied appropriately and robustly, it could and should enable many hundreds (and perhaps many thousands) of federal prisoners to have excessive prison sentences reduced on a variety of grounds. 

Related Keywords

, Zullo Brooker , Brian Owens , Bureau Of Prisons , Sixth Circuit , Second Circuit , Fifth Sixth , Tenth Circuits , First Step Act , Judge Thapar , ஜுழ்ளோ ப்ரூக்கர் , ஈயந் ஓவந்ஸ் , பணியகம் ஆஃப் ப்ரிஸந்ஸ் , ஆறாவது சுற்று , இரண்டாவது சுற்று , ஐந்தாவது ஆறாவது , பத்தாவது சுற்றுகள் , முதல் படி நாடகம் , நீதிபதி தாப்பர் ,

© 2025 Vimarsana