Transcripts For SFGTV 20240622 : vimarsana.com

So our process began in 2007 because of the distressed condition of the Public Housing they created a task force with the hope sf principles as well as American People rfp process for the developers selection theres been Extensive Community engagement and outreach and depending on the phase of the developments they include participated in design and planning to relocation and discussing our assessment and artwork at the site mocd helps to support the Community Engagement like health fairs and Community Wide events and cooking classes and Community Gardens four hope sf sites is a contact map the four largest housing sites of these sunnyvale is the largest all 4 are in the southeast part of the city Hunters Point is now under construction for phase 2 adding which is part of the Community Agreement with lennar mar candle stick point that has not come before you is started construction on phase one and two of marsh of this year sales is here asking for a ceqa certification today so this is our overall schedule once the hope sf will total 45 hundred units with the replacement and the overall initiate should be implemented in 2022 i want to touch on each site has a master developer and Development Team Hunters Point and Alice Griffith are the Successor Agency and sunnyvale and castro are funded by missouri cds but but all the sunnyvale and potrero mostly the master developer that has site control to the developer that is will be excused between the Housing Authority and allowing for 99 year ground leases the conveyance of the land for a mandatory development and conveyance of the streets back to the city and this amendment will be approved by the Housing Authority commission the documents are 9 relocation plan many requires outreach for the public the on the altering all the time is the development all the time that will be excused between the developer and planning and has the entitlements of the Community Benefits and that will be approved by the Planning Commission and the board of supervisors with that im going to turn it over to matt. Thank you. Ill quickly kind of grow through the urban design and planning promise and talk about how we plan to structure the entitlements so again, if we zoom into jonas does this mike work. Yeah. Sunnyvale is located in the Visitacion Valley neighborhood it is locked north of the county line and north of geneva he we have a quick orientation presumably further the site is nestled if two sides from mclaren park and by Visitacion Valley neighborhood as part of the rfp process the initial process before it became the planning missouri works with mercy housing to come up with a site plan did is a thorough analysis and some of the things highlight show how disconnected from the community here the block pattern showing you how different sunnyvale is compared to a typical walk of Visitacion Valley and then again, the building pattern instead of being towards the streets their perpendicularly and theres skwaths of yards or parking that have no a lack of sense of occupancy or eyes on the street and also generally a lack of infrastructure here you see a street without sidewalks and see also the disconnection from the other neighborhood here typified by a slope so urban designers or the architect they looked at the hope sf principles and good urban design in planning principles and heres some of the strategies theyre looking to use to change the site their luke, of course to provide Public Housing on site citing it is a rh1 integrate with the 10urg9d neighborhood and sales is lateral just residential so just to add in addition use like retail and increase the Community Related use and also a key part of hope sf introduce the market rate housing to provide a more complete neighborhood and help to cross subsidies the improvements for the site and again to provide Community Services onsite and so heres the existing block pattern what we hope to do at the conclusion of the landlineed built out heres the existing site plan and the site plan that mercy housing and van pollack provided for the community ill you think through a few features the streets are made regular and the units increased to 17 hundred and introducing retails to the site 3 new parks of 11 acres and increase the connect its and streets to better street standards and feature the sets back and to help to define a sense of occupancy and ownership the streets in the public realm heres a rendering of what we hope to have at the conclusion and increased its to the south towards hertz playground a gateway that features Community Center retail overseeing the hours at sunnyvale and hahn new parks and pathways roughly 11 acres of new parks to help to bring mclaren park into the site to the northwest access and couple of east west assess along sunnyvale a central spine of open space parkways they have singularly 3 exponents of rezoning our jurisdiction the Development Agreement that is between mercy housing and the city and lisa mentioned the master agreement between mercy housing and the current Property Owners the zoning will keep 9 rh1 district that will essentially all the broad riches of density and site coverage most of the fine constrain controls for buildings will be in a separate document we sometimes refer to them as design formulate that will essential ass actress as the planning code specific for the site special use district includes procedures for both buildings and streets and parks similar to with you proved for park merced and currently it is zoned for 50 f t their take advantage of the increased capacity and the master Development Agreement between 9 city and the developer it will include the investing rights for the developer but such a such the infrastructure for that the overall road map for several years and as listing i cant alluded to the master agreement between the developer and the Housing Authority. So in conclusion, we hope to see this is the existing condition with the build out of sunnydale and able to see a more integrated neighborhood were all here to answer any questions you might have thank you. Opening it up for Public Comment if theres any not seeing Public Comment is closed. Commissioner moore. Interesting plan thank you for starting to fill us in do i have any idea of what the elements of phasing might be Critical Mass a really important to understand and feel the transformation of that neighborhood i know in certain other projects increments are small is there anything youre not rebuilding streets any large stent you can build one. So the phasing will largely be griffin by the fund were looking at what the infrastructure needs of each portion of the site will be and looking at implementing that plan and particle listing the Affordable Housing development this is driven by the affordable timing and hopefully to be able to parcel off the sites and sell them so the proceeds can cross subsidize the work for rebuild. Just to the director one of the numbers which trigger a feeling of complete development is in the hundred to 2 hundred units of the many blocks it would be great not to build half blocks especially end for the rest of the neighborhood as you are redeveloping you i hope we get guidance. Im happy to have that conversation in the next few months i think one way or another what youre talking about is creating a Critical Mass and i appreciate that well work with them on that. Commissioner antonini. Yeah. I think you answered my first question i saw the completion at a time was 2034 probably because of the phasing but my second question 7 hundred units i assume the 775 is market rate am i correct about that. Theres a exponent of the Affordable Housing that is added to that so this is ramming i didnt from mercy housing and were a codeveloper so the breakdown is the maximum of 17 hundred units 7 hundred 75 will be replacement unit 2 hundred and 31 is additional affordable apartments in the replacement unit but adding to the housing unit and 6 hundred and 94 market rate units. Okay. Thank you. Commissioner wu. So to add to the conversation around phasing i feel like some of what were seeing is in the eastern neighborhoods the housing came on before the parcel is there any triggers as to the more complete neighborhoods aspects when those will be phased in or totally up to funding. Hello, again so were going to start our initial phases with the Affordable Housing replacements housing and were going to also simultaneously look at how to build a new neighborhood hub that is part of the master plan thats the gateway discriminate that matched it at the intersection of sunnyvale and hahn that is pretty ambitious and achieves are neighborhood with a lot of programs and spaces directly across the street that will take some. To raise the capital but the intent while were work on the initial phases and those are in construction we are fundraiser for that neighborhood hub that includes the space. And one more thing the importance of the relocation plan i saw it in there on the things to be implemented by i details and the ability to for people to come back and come to the highest percentage of people returning to housing will be role the most important thing. Commissioner johnson. Thank you so just a couple of quick questions so can we get a little bit more into the future approval phasing plans would be part of which approval . The phasing plan b will be part of the reDevelopment Agreement. I assume getting to commissioner wus question youre working with cpa and dpw how they support that. That had been part of the process as we have conversations theyve had ongoing conversations with mta theyve engaged dpw at a deeper level for the mapping through will be incorporated into the mapping agreement. I think i know the answer the zoning agreement eventually to the board of supervisors and to the Planning Commission. It comes to you first and then the board of supervisors. Fantastic. Last question is the relocation plan i know that is part of the master Development Agreement for the Public Housing is it different but the relocation plan is needed here as an attachment to the master agreement is there someone making sure it is totally up to form with the relocation act, etc. , etc. It will follow the hud guidelines and approved by hud and it is approved by the Housing Authority commission. I know it goes through that commission but for staff as an attachment. Well give it to you as part of our information when you take action. Okay. Great thank you. Sorry did someone make a motion and i missed it. That was only information. I called them together and oh all right. Yeah. Good afternoon, commissioners Environmental Planning the item before you is the certification of the final Environmental Impact report for the sunnyvale va last could hope sf project that is a voinl vibrant Environmental Impact report statement for the eir e i s that satisfies the National Interim act it was approved by the maumd im joined by my colleagues from the mocd and the project sponsors are here draft eir e i s two public hearing was held at the regular Commission Meeting on january 22nd, 2015, the Public Comment closed on january 22nd and the response document was published following publication of the comments and responses document a letter was received from the california transportation of caltrain that includes the concussion of the memorizes in the report that reduces the vehicle trips and products Sustainable Transportation modes as stated in the section of the eir and response t r4 the proposed project will result in less than significant transportation impacts in the existing project scenario with mitigation incorporated and the project will result in angle unhave been able traffic levels of service at certain intersections they reduced the trips generated by the project data is not available that demonstratively reduces the traffic to a significant level how have staff has confirmed the preordain to incorporate those and precede caltrain letter recommends the further clarification of the reasons why the traffic generated by the proposed period during the a. M. Park peak period did not generate a further analysis and because of the comments and responses document the daily a. M. And p. M. Peak hour trips generated westbound estimated using the citys Impact Analysis for Environmental Impact report and the trip generations by the trip engineers both show the traffic yes, i did. Land use types is typically higher in the p. M. Than the a. M. Peak the a. M. Peak traffic the peak hour generation is not during the peak period like large educational institutions or intersections on the downtown one way that serves the in bound traffic, however, theyre not applicable to the project or the project site given that the composition of the existing project and surrounding neighborhood is primarily residential no evidence to suggest the traffic volumes are higher than in the a. M. Than the p. M. Then the eir adequately captures the highest traffic of the day and the analysis of the a. M. Peak did not provide information that changes the conclusions or mitigation measures because this letter was received this week we didnt include it in the responses document, however, the concerns raised in the letter have similar in the letter to the draft common period that were respond to in the comments and responses document as i mentioned the evaluation of the issues contained in the eir i s the implementation of the project result in considerable contributions to significant unhave been able Environmental Review those impacts are dehydration of the project sites therefore the commission needs to adapt a statement of overriding to the Environmental Quality act should the commission approve the act so in communication staff recommends that the commission adopt the motion that certificates the contains of the report are accurate and adequate and the peered for the eir complies with ceqa and the ceqas guidelines and chapter 31 of the administrative code that concludes my presentation. And if you have any questions, ill be happy to answer them opening it up for Public Comment. No Public Comment commissioners. No. No, thats right you can call Public Comment it is an agenda decided item not seeing Public Comment is closed. Commissioners commissioner wu move to certify the final eir to find is accurate and adequate. Second. Commissioner antonini. I believe the language was included in regards to the offer riding project approval. Oh, say can you see by the dawns early light it is not. Commissioners there is a motion and a second to certify the Environmental Impact report commissioner antonini. Commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you on item 11 and good afternoon, commissioners im here to talk about the dagget in kind agreement for a points 9 acre park on a dagget street right away it is located in the intersection of 16 and 1800 youve never driven counsel there but a land owned by itself city it is portland it is shores of mission bay and so it is in the state trust for a long, long time in kind is proposed by itself developer of joining development there is 4 hundred had he 50 units being built on the dagget street rightofway and the proposal for the park a commemorate reduction of eastern neighborhoods so the original in kind agreement was approved in november of 2012 that was for one . 88 million and now we have in front of if you the reason were in front of you a lot has happened the negotiation how to transfer it the rezone and the placing program for public site not on the park things that have not changed the design of the park as well in agreement to maintain the park in period of time its that is a benefit to the city that gridlock out stretches the in kind agreement and the park itself and also the developers is proposing a gift to the city above and beyond more than the in kind park a valued at were here to ask for an increase 23wr0 88 million to 2 million 369,000 plus an increase thats about a 40 percent of total increase of the cost of the project the project is 3 housing unit 7 million to over 4 million why has to theres ill go through that in the in kind all the time and the park Construction Costs since the original time we scoped this project over 450,000 it is for the developers only the cost of doing business as but the k34r5ik9d business detailed their work and moving a sewer line to a place it can be assessed in the future so the Public Housing<\/a> they created a task force with the hope sf principles as well as American People<\/a> rfp process for the developers selection theres been Extensive Community<\/a> engagement and outreach and depending on the phase of the developments they include participated in design and planning to relocation and discussing our assessment and artwork at the site mocd helps to support the Community Engagement<\/a> like health fairs and Community Wide<\/a> events and cooking classes and Community Gardens<\/a> four hope sf sites is a contact map the four largest housing sites of these sunnyvale is the largest all 4 are in the southeast part of the city Hunters Point<\/a> is now under construction for phase 2 adding which is part of the Community Agreement<\/a> with lennar mar candle stick point that has not come before you is started construction on phase one and two of marsh of this year sales is here asking for a ceqa certification today so this is our overall schedule once the hope sf will total 45 hundred units with the replacement and the overall initiate should be implemented in 2022 i want to touch on each site has a master developer and Development Team<\/a> Hunters Point<\/a> and Alice Griffith<\/a> are the Successor Agency<\/a> and sunnyvale and castro are funded by missouri cds but but all the sunnyvale and potrero mostly the master developer that has site control to the developer that is will be excused between the Housing Authority<\/a> and allowing for 99 year ground leases the conveyance of the land for a mandatory development and conveyance of the streets back to the city and this amendment will be approved by the Housing Authority<\/a> commission the documents are 9 relocation plan many requires outreach for the public the on the altering all the time is the development all the time that will be excused between the developer and planning and has the entitlements of the Community Benefits<\/a> and that will be approved by the Planning Commission<\/a> and the board of supervisors with that im going to turn it over to matt. Thank you. Ill quickly kind of grow through the urban design and planning promise and talk about how we plan to structure the entitlements so again, if we zoom into jonas does this mike work. Yeah. Sunnyvale is located in the Visitacion Valley<\/a> neighborhood it is locked north of the county line and north of geneva he we have a quick orientation presumably further the site is nestled if two sides from mclaren park and by Visitacion Valley<\/a> neighborhood as part of the rfp process the initial process before it became the planning missouri works with mercy housing to come up with a site plan did is a thorough analysis and some of the things highlight show how disconnected from the community here the block pattern showing you how different sunnyvale is compared to a typical walk of Visitacion Valley<\/a> and then again, the building pattern instead of being towards the streets their perpendicularly and theres skwaths of yards or parking that have no a lack of sense of occupancy or eyes on the street and also generally a lack of infrastructure here you see a street without sidewalks and see also the disconnection from the other neighborhood here typified by a slope so urban designers or the architect they looked at the hope sf principles and good urban design in planning principles and heres some of the strategies theyre looking to use to change the site their luke, of course to provide Public Housing<\/a> on site citing it is a rh1 integrate with the 10urg9d neighborhood and sales is lateral just residential so just to add in addition use like retail and increase the Community Related<\/a> use and also a key part of hope sf introduce the market rate housing to provide a more complete neighborhood and help to cross subsidies the improvements for the site and again to provide Community Services<\/a> onsite and so heres the existing block pattern what we hope to do at the conclusion of the landlineed built out heres the existing site plan and the site plan that mercy housing and van pollack provided for the community ill you think through a few features the streets are made regular and the units increased to 17 hundred and introducing retails to the site 3 new parks of 11 acres and increase the connect its and streets to better street standards and feature the sets back and to help to define a sense of occupancy and ownership the streets in the public realm heres a rendering of what we hope to have at the conclusion and increased its to the south towards hertz playground a gateway that features Community Center<\/a> retail overseeing the hours at sunnyvale and hahn new parks and pathways roughly 11 acres of new parks to help to bring mclaren park into the site to the northwest access and couple of east west assess along sunnyvale a central spine of open space parkways they have singularly 3 exponents of rezoning our jurisdiction the Development Agreement<\/a> that is between mercy housing and the city and lisa mentioned the master agreement between mercy housing and the current Property Owners<\/a> the zoning will keep 9 rh1 district that will essentially all the broad riches of density and site coverage most of the fine constrain controls for buildings will be in a separate document we sometimes refer to them as design formulate that will essential ass actress as the planning code specific for the site special use district includes procedures for both buildings and streets and parks similar to with you proved for park merced and currently it is zoned for 50 f t their take advantage of the increased capacity and the master Development Agreement<\/a> between 9 city and the developer it will include the investing rights for the developer but such a such the infrastructure for that the overall road map for several years and as listing i cant alluded to the master agreement between the developer and the Housing Authority<\/a>. So in conclusion, we hope to see this is the existing condition with the build out of sunnydale and able to see a more integrated neighborhood were all here to answer any questions you might have thank you. Opening it up for Public Comment<\/a> if theres any not seeing Public Comment<\/a> is closed. Commissioner moore. Interesting plan thank you for starting to fill us in do i have any idea of what the elements of phasing might be Critical Mass<\/a> a really important to understand and feel the transformation of that neighborhood i know in certain other projects increments are small is there anything youre not rebuilding streets any large stent you can build one. So the phasing will largely be griffin by the fund were looking at what the infrastructure needs of each portion of the site will be and looking at implementing that plan and particle listing the Affordable Housing<\/a> development this is driven by the affordable timing and hopefully to be able to parcel off the sites and sell them so the proceeds can cross subsidize the work for rebuild. Just to the director one of the numbers which trigger a feeling of complete development is in the hundred to 2 hundred units of the many blocks it would be great not to build half blocks especially end for the rest of the neighborhood as you are redeveloping you i hope we get guidance. Im happy to have that conversation in the next few months i think one way or another what youre talking about is creating a Critical Mass<\/a> and i appreciate that well work with them on that. Commissioner antonini. Yeah. I think you answered my first question i saw the completion at a time was 2034 probably because of the phasing but my second question 7 hundred units i assume the 775 is market rate am i correct about that. Theres a exponent of the Affordable Housing<\/a> that is added to that so this is ramming i didnt from mercy housing and were a codeveloper so the breakdown is the maximum of 17 hundred units 7 hundred 75 will be replacement unit 2 hundred and 31 is additional affordable apartments in the replacement unit but adding to the housing unit and 6 hundred and 94 market rate units. Okay. Thank you. Commissioner wu. So to add to the conversation around phasing i feel like some of what were seeing is in the eastern neighborhoods the housing came on before the parcel is there any triggers as to the more complete neighborhoods aspects when those will be phased in or totally up to funding. Hello, again so were going to start our initial phases with the Affordable Housing<\/a> replacements housing and were going to also simultaneously look at how to build a new neighborhood hub that is part of the master plan thats the gateway discriminate that matched it at the intersection of sunnyvale and hahn that is pretty ambitious and achieves are neighborhood with a lot of programs and spaces directly across the street that will take some. To raise the capital but the intent while were work on the initial phases and those are in construction we are fundraiser for that neighborhood hub that includes the space. And one more thing the importance of the relocation plan i saw it in there on the things to be implemented by i details and the ability to for people to come back and come to the highest percentage of people returning to housing will be role the most important thing. Commissioner johnson. Thank you so just a couple of quick questions so can we get a little bit more into the future approval phasing plans would be part of which approval . The phasing plan b will be part of the reDevelopment Agreement<\/a>. I assume getting to commissioner wus question youre working with cpa and dpw how they support that. That had been part of the process as we have conversations theyve had ongoing conversations with mta theyve engaged dpw at a deeper level for the mapping through will be incorporated into the mapping agreement. I think i know the answer the zoning agreement eventually to the board of supervisors and to the Planning Commission<\/a>. It comes to you first and then the board of supervisors. Fantastic. Last question is the relocation plan i know that is part of the master Development Agreement<\/a> for the Public Housing<\/a> is it different but the relocation plan is needed here as an attachment to the master agreement is there someone making sure it is totally up to form with the relocation act, etc. , etc. It will follow the hud guidelines and approved by hud and it is approved by the Housing Authority<\/a> commission. I know it goes through that commission but for staff as an attachment. Well give it to you as part of our information when you take action. Okay. Great thank you. Sorry did someone make a motion and i missed it. That was only information. I called them together and oh all right. Yeah. Good afternoon, commissioners Environmental Planning<\/a> the item before you is the certification of the final Environmental Impact<\/a> report for the sunnyvale va last could hope sf project that is a voinl vibrant Environmental Impact<\/a> report statement for the eir e i s that satisfies the National Interim<\/a> act it was approved by the maumd im joined by my colleagues from the mocd and the project sponsors are here draft eir e i s two public hearing was held at the regular Commission Meeting<\/a> on january 22nd, 2015, the Public Comment<\/a> closed on january 22nd and the response document was published following publication of the comments and responses document a letter was received from the california transportation of caltrain that includes the concussion of the memorizes in the report that reduces the vehicle trips and products Sustainable Transportation<\/a> modes as stated in the section of the eir and response t r4 the proposed project will result in less than significant transportation impacts in the existing project scenario with mitigation incorporated and the project will result in angle unhave been able traffic levels of service at certain intersections they reduced the trips generated by the project data is not available that demonstratively reduces the traffic to a significant level how have staff has confirmed the preordain to incorporate those and precede caltrain letter recommends the further clarification of the reasons why the traffic generated by the proposed period during the a. M. Park peak period did not generate a further analysis and because of the comments and responses document the daily a. M. And p. M. Peak hour trips generated westbound estimated using the citys Impact Analysis<\/a> for Environmental Impact<\/a> report and the trip generations by the trip engineers both show the traffic yes, i did. Land use types is typically higher in the p. M. Than the a. M. Peak the a. M. Peak traffic the peak hour generation is not during the peak period like large educational institutions or intersections on the downtown one way that serves the in bound traffic, however, theyre not applicable to the project or the project site given that the composition of the existing project and surrounding neighborhood is primarily residential no evidence to suggest the traffic volumes are higher than in the a. M. Than the p. M. Then the eir adequately captures the highest traffic of the day and the analysis of the a. M. Peak did not provide information that changes the conclusions or mitigation measures because this letter was received this week we didnt include it in the responses document, however, the concerns raised in the letter have similar in the letter to the draft common period that were respond to in the comments and responses document as i mentioned the evaluation of the issues contained in the eir i s the implementation of the project result in considerable contributions to significant unhave been able Environmental Review<\/a> those impacts are dehydration of the project sites therefore the commission needs to adapt a statement of overriding to the Environmental Quality<\/a> act should the commission approve the act so in communication staff recommends that the commission adopt the motion that certificates the contains of the report are accurate and adequate and the peered for the eir complies with ceqa and the ceqas guidelines and chapter 31 of the administrative code that concludes my presentation. And if you have any questions, ill be happy to answer them opening it up for Public Comment<\/a>. No Public Comment<\/a> commissioners. No. No, thats right you can call Public Comment<\/a> it is an agenda decided item not seeing Public Comment<\/a> is closed. Commissioners commissioner wu move to certify the final eir to find is accurate and adequate. Second. Commissioner antonini. I believe the language was included in regards to the offer riding project approval. Oh, say can you see by the dawns early light it is not. Commissioners there is a motion and a second to certify the Environmental Impact<\/a> report commissioner antonini. Commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you on item 11 and good afternoon, commissioners im here to talk about the dagget in kind agreement for a points 9 acre park on a dagget street right away it is located in the intersection of 16 and 1800 youve never driven counsel there but a land owned by itself city it is portland it is shores of mission bay and so it is in the state trust for a long, long time in kind is proposed by itself developer of joining development there is 4 hundred had he 50 units being built on the dagget street rightofway and the proposal for the park a commemorate reduction of eastern neighborhoods so the original in kind agreement was approved in november of 2012 that was for one . 88 million and now we have in front of if you the reason were in front of you a lot has happened the negotiation how to transfer it the rezone and the placing program for public site not on the park things that have not changed the design of the park as well in agreement to maintain the park in period of time its that is a benefit to the city that gridlock out stretches the in kind agreement and the park itself and also the developers is proposing a gift to the city above and beyond more than the in kind park a valued at were here to ask for an increase 23wr0 88 million to 2 million 369,000 plus an increase thats about a 40 percent of total increase of the cost of the project the project is 3 housing unit 7 million to over 4 million why has to theres ill go through that in the in kind all the time and the park Construction Costs<\/a> since the original time we scoped this project over 450,000 it is for the developers only the cost of doing business as but the k34r5ik9d business detailed their work and moving a sewer line to a place it can be assessed in the future so the Planning Department<\/a> said that portion is not your fault the are developer will thats why take that and it is 900,000 plus biggest change is since the in kind agreement the City Attorneys Office<\/a> ruled that prevailing wage is to all in kind agreement even though not being built i by the city it increased the costs and the reason is that i know if youre an electrician or some kind of high pay person but for a regular laborer getting 15 or 20 an hour those things catch up quickly another change we have anymore full construction drawings the total change in that is 29 thoutdz thousand dollars plus they split the difference were proposing the 4,000 plus to the city in the time since the plan the in kind agreement was approved the city raised theyre paying requirements to make it more complicated to patch a hole in the street that you so pave to the midline that cost more and for all the changes theres an increase in taxes and fees thats 49,000 the total change is the sum is 4 Hunters Point<\/a> and 89,000 mr. And mrs. Plus at the same time the remainder the developer is increasing the gift to the city of from one Million Dollars<\/a> to 1. 6 million as part of the process were before the eastern neighborhoods on june 15th of this year they unanimously supported the increase in the in kind agreement and i want to read a couple of changes to the in kind agreement what we realized in the last week the fees is actually the total fees and not for the eastern neighborhood fees that is the only thing to get a waiver so in article 3. 1 the fees owed from 4. 4 million plus to 4. 02 m. D. 88 and for the record the remainder amount owed to the city goes from 2 million to 1 million plus","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"archive.org","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","width":"800","height":"600","url":"\/\/ia902707.us.archive.org\/16\/items\/SFGTV_20150715_103000\/SFGTV_20150715_103000.thumbs\/SFGTV_20150715_103000_000001.jpg"}},"autauthor":{"@type":"Organization"},"author":{"sameAs":"archive.org","name":"archive.org"}}],"coverageEndTime":"20240629T12:35:10+00:00"}