Is absent. The next order of business is item 2 announcements. The next regularly scheduled meeting will be held on november 7th, 2017, at 1 00 p. M. At city hall, room 416c. The announcement of sound producing Electronic Devices during the meeting, please be advised that the ringing of and the use of cell phones, pagers and similar soundproducing Electronic Devices are prohibited at this meeting. Please be advised that the chair may order the removal from the meeting room of any persons responsible for the ringing of or the use of the cellphone, pager or other similar soundproducing electronic device. C, announcement of time allotment for Public Comment. Please be advised a member of the public has up to 3 minutes to make pertinent Public Comments on each agenda item unless the Commission Adopts a shorter period on any item and its strongly recommended that the members of public who wish to address the commission fill out a speaker card and submit the completed card to the Commission Secretary. The next order of business is item 3, report on actions taken and a previous closed session meeting, if any. There are no reportable actions. The next order of business is item 4, matters of unfinished business. There are no matters of unfinished business. The next order of business is item 5, matters of new business consisting of consent and regular agenda. First, the consent agenda, 5a, approval of minutes, september 19, 2017. Mr. Vice chair . Vice chair Miguel Bustos madam secretary, do you have any speaker cards for this item . Clerk no, mr. Vice chair, i do not have any speaker cards. Vice chair Miguel Bustos hearing no, any further questions. Anyone on the public here want to speak on this item . Put me in. Vice chair Miguel Bustos vice chair Miguel Bustos this is on the consent. On the consent, i will back up. Vice chair Miguel Bustos okay. So seeing none, i will close Public Comment. I move it. Vice chair Miguel Bustos and i turn to my fellow commissioners, commissioner singh. Motion to approve . Darshan singh second. Vice chair Miguel Bustos please take roll, madam secretary. Clerk please announce when i call your name roll call . Mr. Vice chair the vote is three ayes and two absent. Vice chair Miguel Bustos vice chair Miguel Bustos motion carries. Please call the next item. Clerk the number item is 5b, selecting Bridge HousingCorporation Corporation and Community Housing partnership for the development of 141 affordable rental housing units, including one managers unit, with Supportive Services for formerly homeless persons at Mission Bay South block 9, Mission Bay South redevelopment project area, res Institution Number [382017] madam collector . Good afternoon, commissioners. This item is to select the nonprofit developer that would develop parcels in Mission Bay South, block 9. Back in april, the commission released the r. F. P. To Seek Developers for Nonprofit Development within the Mission Bay South project area and in june we issued an addendum to that r. F. P. And just this summer through the Selection Committee made selected two nonprofit developers, as well as c. H. P. , to be partners with us in this development. And today before you is to have an act to approve the selection of these two developers. I should note that we have representatives from Bridge Housing as well as c. H. P. In the audience as well as the architects. And i want to thank the mission bay c. F. C. For their action recently in endorsing the selection. With that ill turn it over to kimberly, within ocii to lead the discussion. Thank you. Thank you. Good afternoon, members of the commission, im kim obsfeld with ocii housing team. Im here this afternoon to present on item 5b, approving the selection of Bridge Housing and Community Housing partnership with stacy architects to design, develop and operate approximately 141 affordable rental units with Supportive Services for formerly homeless persons on Mission Bay South block 9 in the Mission Bay South project area. Your approval allows ocii to proceed with this important project. Mission bay south block 9 is adjacent to the Public Safety building between mission rock street to the north, and china basin street to the south. Block 9 will be cut into two, were working now on block 9 which is the western portion of this site and well develop block 9a in the future as a separate Affordable Housing project. The developers of block 9 will design and construct bridgeview way, between blocks 9 and 9a. And block 9 is wellserved by transit, including the munnie metro line on third street and is within walking distance to many amenities, including grocery stores, a pharmacy, a Public Library and parks and open spaces. Before i go into detail regarding developer selection for block 9, ill provide some background on the mission bay project area. In 1998, the Redevelopment AgencyCommission Approved the mission bay north and south reDevelopment Plans and owner participation agreements or o. P. A. S. The o. P. A. S allow are if the development of up to 6,514 residential units in mission bay, with nearly 30 of that total set aside as affordable excuse me, Affordable Housing units. In mission bay north, all 698 inclusionary and ocii sponsored units have been completed. In Mission Bay South, 350 affordable units have been constructed in the project area and another 868 are planned or are under construction. The o. P. A. S require that the master develop more submit Development Plans in major phases and it includes commercial and residential developments, Public Infrastructure and parks. The master developer included block 9 in its 2004 major phase approval request for blocks 8, 9, 9a, 10, 10a and parks p18, p19, and p20. The block 9 parcel was confirmed as an Affordable Housing site at that time. In april 2017, ocii staff released a request for proposals or r. F. P. And selecting a team to develop, own and operate housing on block 9. The r. F. P. Was widely circulated with emails list maintained by omp oci and the department of homelessness and Supportive Housing and as well as through advertisements. It specified that respondents should have a qualified housing developer, an architect and a property manager and Services Provider and it established that the site would be developed as Affordable Housing with Onsite Services for formerly homeless persons. The r. F. P. Did not specify a unit count but asked for furnished studio units and very limited park asking Community Spaces and amenities to support the population. We also required conventional and Modular Construction scenarios. This request was based on conversations with the Mayors Office about how city agencies can complete Affordable Housing for formerly homeless persons as efficiently as possible. Just a quick overview of the selection criteria as its spelled out in the r. F. P. , a total of 45 points are based on the actual concept for the site, including proposed massing and financing, the remaining 55 units are based on the experience and the qualifications of the applicant team. We received two submittals in response to this r. F. P. And one from a team led by Bridge Housing and Community Housing partnership or c. H. P. And another from a team led by mercy housing and Episcopal Community services. Proposals were reviewed by an eightperson Evaluation Panel that included a representative from the mission bay Advisory Committee or c. A. C. , and representatives from the Mayors Office of housing and community development, and the department of homelessness and Supportive Housing, and representatives from ociis design and housing and mission bay project management teams. Both proposals were well thought out and two very different approaches to the project. Ultimately bridge and c. H. P. Received the highest total score and while individual panelists scored differently, the panelists were unanimous in awarding the bridge c. H. P. Proposal the highest number of points. A few key elements of the bridgec. H. P. Proposal, they proposed 141 total units, including one managers unit. In the past the Redevelopment Agency and ocii have developed projects that serve a similar project in the hays valley and the transbay neighborhoods and 141 units is a bit more than that are included on those sites but the unit count better utilize this is site and allows for an onsite livein manager and sevendayaweek Case Management rather than just mondayfriday as would be typical. The full Team Includes leddy stacy as well as health right 360 to provide nursing and onsite medical supports and c. H. P. Will serve as the longterm property manager and the services manager. Having a single entity provide both services and Property Management has proven to be beneficial in other similar projects, in ensuring close planning and ongoing coordination. The building amenities include a Community Courtyard and Community Rooms and a services suite, bicycle parking and a bike repair station. The design responds well to site conditions and really max nices the Natural Light in the units, along corridors and throughout the site. Just for comparison, a few highlights of the mercy episcopal proposal and also very strong but with a different approach. The Team Proposed 233 units in two separate buildings and one that serves homeless seniors and another that serves formerly homeless adults. Episcopal would be the longterm Owner Operator and work as property manager and coordinate the services among several entities. A thoughtful design with a large garden between the two buildings and a health clinic, roof decks and other resident serving amenities. The Evaluation Panel highlighted several compelling reasons for recommending the bridgec. H. P. Proposal and among these are the strength and the experience of the team. Bridgechp and l. M. S. All have significant and relevant experience in building for and serving this population. In addition, the estimated costs in ocii subsidy were lower on a costperunit basis and overall the team had a thoughtful plan that responded well to the r. F. P. And meets design requirements. While well be back later in the Development Process for a comhencivcomprehensive design rd like to highlight a few. Its hard to see in that site plan, but in the site plan in front of you the Team Proposed a ushaped building with a central resident courtyard as well as a Community Garden that connects to the future bridgeview way. This is the elevation along china basin street with the Public Safety building on the left. The building is four stories and it aligns with the height of the existing wall of the Public Safety building. And this is the view from bridgeview way with the Community Garden and resident courtyard at the center. And, finally, this is the view from mission rock street, with the Public Safety building to the right. We have heard many questions and concerns about this project from the community. Ocii staff has made presentations at several mission bay c. A. C. Meetings and we also attended an evening meeting organized by the community in may. It was a large meeting and there was strong opposition to the proposed program for block 9. In response and to better help residents and other Community Members to get a sense of the project we organized several tours of similar housing completed by the Redevelopment Agency and ocii and those tours were held in june and july. While there continues to be opposition to this type of Affordable Housing were not aware to any opposition of the selection of the recommended developer team. Engaging with community will continue to be a high priority as we move forward. If approved, c. H. P. And bridge will begin reaching out to the neighborhood and the Greater Community and they anticipate Holding Meetings with h. O. A. S to address concerns and to work through issues. We expect that those meetings will happen later this year and early next year. James tracy at c. P. H. , who is here today, will lead the Community Outreach and be the primary contact for arranging those meetings. We anticipate returning to you early next year for approval of a predevelopment loan and to enter into an exclusive negotiations agreement. We then anticipate going to the mission bay c. A. C. For a discussion regarding the Concept Design and will then move forward with a full schematic design. At that time the team will be prepared to make a recommendation regarding construction time, specifically the extent to which the use of modular units might result in time and cost savings on this project. That concludes my staff presentation and i do want to introduce a few members of the recommended team, if you would just stand or wave when i call your name. From c. H. P. We have gail gillman, the c. E. O. And david schnerr with housing development. Daniel potter, project manager. And james tracy, director of community engagement. From Bridge Housing we have smitha, the Vice President of Real Estate Development and kevin griffith, director of Business Development and richard stacy, principal. And thank you very much for your time this afternoon and we are excited to get going on this project. Thank you. Vice chair Miguel Bustos thank you. Madam secretary, do we have any speaker cards . Clerk yes, mr. Vice chair, i have 14. Vice chair Miguel Bustos 14. So i have a question of the audience here, who was here, by show of hands, and wants to speak on this particular item . And who have not submitted a card . All right. So im sure well have some more. I would encourage everybody to fill out speaker cards. So if you have not done so, please fill them out for this particular or any other item that you would like to speak on. Vice chair Miguel Bustos okay, ladies and gentlemen, for fire safety reasons, obviously, with this being a packed house, or a packed agenda, we would like to ask if our Commission Secretary could read the 13 speakers that have signed up to stand on this side and if you are not hear to talk about this item we would ask you to step outside because we have to have all of the aisle way clears and then when the item comes up well let you know. The sheriff is actually trying to find another room for us to have an overflow where youll be able to see proceedings as they go forward. So, madam secretary, announce the 13 names and well ask those folks to stand up and then everyone else if you could just move outside until we get to your item. Clerk [reading of names] coming through. Ing of names] is that good . Yep. Ok. Great. All right. So, want to call the next corinne woods. Good afternoon, commissioner