Development unit. The question raised to have an expert on staff who is able to look demolitions more from an architect side, structural engineer, is there any way to augment that position by 1. 5 positions to do both . I think that the short answer, we think we have enough to financially support one person to just to be devoted to adu, but when those issues come up, other planners get involved. So Historic Preservation planner would look at if there is a preservation issue. At this point, the mayors budget request to all departments was not to add any positions so were pushing the envelope a little bit, because we think we can justify it based on the fees, but when the issues come up. I will take a little bit of exception to what ms. Hester said we just rubber stamp them, we spend a lot of time looking at them. The number of adu approved, we spent a lot of time looking at these issues when they do come in and Preservation Planners do look at them. My point is, there will be more than one person devoted to the work. Commissioner moore one additional question, the expenditure budget, i see capital and equipment, 19 fy 1920 to become zero and material and supplies increasing by 200,000, that is a time when youre moving. Does that mean that youre not adding equipment and why is the number zero, i thought you would need a boost with new space, new equipment is happening, so you would want up to date equipment. We absolutely want uptodate equipment. Given the life span of larger machines its more than standard p. C. , so we refresh our p. C. S about every three years and refresh our larger printers, copiers, those are anywhere in the 510 year range. So we will of course take another look again next year, but as of right now were not projecting that the major equipment costs will come into play in 1920. We have lets see. We have three plotters and those we all expect to be continuing in their life. The servers that we have sometimes needed to replace. Technically, equipment is anything that is 5,000 or more with a useful life span of more than three years. Because we are moving into a brand new building where there will be equipment provided, were not going to need to buy Replacement Parts for our servers, because there will be some there. That is actually one area well have a little bit of onetime savings, but, yes, the material and supplies, for example, we have to buy all new telephones. And so thats 100,000 because theyre 300 each, 250 and there you go. So it is materials and supplies, one time related to the move as you pointed out. Commissioner richards one other. I know were stuck with section 317 and the complicated way to figure out if something is demoed. The audit with the Zoning Administrator and somebody from Building Inspection Department we only picked five items, but two of them looked like demos, perhaps again, we can devote a fraction of fte to review the demo calculation when theyre on the line, so we have higher accuracy rate. We can have ms. Chutetice do other things with her thursday afternoon. Just a question regarding the new vehicle purchased. I am impressed with the citys efforts to utilize hybrids and electric vehicles and smaller vehicles as far as traffic and emissions are concerned. Is there a plan for the new vehicle to be electric . I do anticipate it will be an electric vehicle. President hillis all right. Thank you, well see you back in a couple of weeks. Sounds great, thank you very much, february 8th. Commissioners, item 10, case number 2009, 3461, this is the area plan implementation update and interdepartment Plan Implementation Committee report, informational presentation. Ipick. Of department staff. Again before you in january, to give you our ipic report. Today, im going to talk quickly about our Implementation Team and the citywide division, ipic, the committee itself, how well look at highlights of the revenue received and what were expecting to receive and speak on the highlights of the six area plans that ipic looks after. Very quickly, the Implementation Team, within the citywide division. It is charged with looking after the area plans. Six area plans that have been approved since 2005. This was a new role for the Planning Department. Usually when we did area plans prior to that we did the land use, but other aspects sat on the shelf. The team was created to make sure we look after other aspects, most specifically around Community Benefits and infrastructure. And with these area plans we had adopted impact fees since 2005 which is the main tool in helping us implement the area plans. The ipic is implementation Plan Implementation Committee. It is made up of other agencies that carry out and create the infrastructure that are called for in the area plans. Together, we prioritize and plan for these projects. The ipic ultimately will approve an expenditure plan every year for each of the six Planning Areas before they become memorialized in the city budget process. So, of the major works that ipic is charged with, one well talk about today, the ipic report, lays out and gives overview of the plan and expenditure plan for impact fee revenue spending in the next five years. The other product that is charged, we wont be covering today which is the area plan mini capital plans, theyre 5year plans for the reduced constrained geographic areas. Theyre done at the same time we do the 10year capital plan. This is off year so this is not a year we worked on this. The other side of planning these infrastructure and Community Benefit projects of course is working with the community. And we have several dimensions from which we do that, from eastern neighborhoods, we have citizen advisory committees to help us plan and look after plan implementation. We have several public realm plans we worked on the past year, dog patch, eastern neighborhoods, the hub plan, octavia and the staff has been working south of downtown, public realm plan, soda. Visitation valley we have a requirement we go after the community a couple of times a year to plan for construction. Balboa has a couple of other cac not related to impact fees, one of which is staffed by the cac and the other by us for the reservoir project. Ill move through the side. Its just to say that our process is similar to any other budget process where we look at where we were in the previous year. We make adjustments based on where we are in terms of revenue and need. We have the cac for their endorsement, the ipic, we bring it to you, which were here today to do and we offer presentation to the Land Use Committee as well. So the spinning categories fort six area plans are generally the same. We update our needs assessments and nexus every five years. The last time we did this, we finished about four years ago. Were providing funds for transit. This is on top of the sf, that is geographically based. Complete streets, bicycle, recreation, open space, childcare and we have a set aside for planning for, but we offer to it other agencies to help us plan, do cost estimate and what have you. So looking at the revenue. So looking at the revenue that we believe we will have received by this end of the this fiscal year, thats june, we believe well have 315 million through the fiscal year, thats what we received thus far through december and what we think well be receiving in the next six months. A couple of things to note. A big chunk of that is from Transit Center and that is because its a small plan area, but theyre very huge Major Projects there which we will be receiving a lot of revenue. Were generally about where we thought we would be last year, so were about the same. In the next five years, we think well have about 77 million across the six plan areas. Again a couple of things to note. Transit center and hill, the revenue goes down pretty substantially, thats because those two plan areas, theyre small with relatively few, but very large projects. Recon hill everything is entitled. Transit center is centimeterly, the real Major Projects have been entitled and we think were going to get in the initial wave most of the income through june. What has gone up, you will note is market octavia, thats because this year we started to look at hub projects and additional impact fee they pay. That weve included in our revenue projections. So ill go quickly through the six plan areas. Highlights. Balboa park, is a plan area in which there are probably the fewest opportunity sites, the least amount of revenue were expecting. We know this is a plan area that has a lot of need. It is the juncture of all of the city transit and regional transit. And so we know there is a lot of need and lot has been happening without impact fees. Of course, unity plaza was completed maybe just before we were here last year. Theyve begun street scaping on geneva, were look to advocate for additional street scaping. Eastern neighborhoods of course is the largest and most complex of the plan areas, as you know, its five plan areas adopted around the same time. Roughly seven years ago now. Ill just run through a couple of things that we can say that has been completed with impact fees. South park was completed just before last year. Our impact fees paid for half of the cost for that project. Similarly, dagget was just about to be complete. That was inkind. Our impact fees paid for half of that project. Also completed around the same time, the new park. Im sorry, im not going to pronounce it, its new park at 17th and fulsome street. This was one of the initial priority projects, completed within the last year. We had a couple of inkinds completed. The one in dog patch, the dog patch art plaza at the end of 19th street. And then the street safe project in western somma, the ringle alley improvements memorializing the gay and Lesbian Community history. So one of the things we say we were able to do with impact fees, theyre often the last dollar in that makes sure the project happens. Sometimes theyre the first dollars in helps provide to get the project going. This year, just as we were about to complete our expenditure plan, mts and dpw asked for funds for a project that was not going to be funded by the 16th street project. It was something that our staff work on and we were able to fund that for 1. 7 million. And were about to complete the dog patch Central Waterfront street scape project. Were going to set aside 10 million to make sure that projects identified can get a head start. And then were also similarly in terms of the first dollar in, putting money aside for three rehabilitation projects in eastern somma, mission rec, in the Mission District and Jackson Playground in show case square. Weve understood that the large projects are going to need a lot more funding, most likely through the bond that theyre planning for 2019. We put additional money aside for rec and park to continue to work on either of those projects and or to plan further for even a bond in later years. For market octavia, weve identified 28 projects that were going to be spending on impact fees. This last year, you approved one oak plaza in association with the one oak project as inkind and that is moving forward. And similarly the staff completed the hub, public realm plan and we started to put money aside specifically to start funding some of the individual projects that were identified in the project and were starting to work with mta and public works to better prioritize cost estimate and see how best to implement those tree skaip projects. Also, were putting a large amount of money into the hayward park rehabilitation. As i mentioned earlier, this is an area plan for which we think we have received most of the opportunity sites have been entitled or completed. We still have a to do list to finish the street scape there. Weve divided projects into priority one, mostly harrison and fremont street and we understood that the impact fees wouldnt play for all of the projects, we identified them as priority two, again public works is taking the lead. Transit center, a few large projects paying large fees. We had implement to you, approved Implementation Plan back in 2012 when you approved the plan area. Were moving forward. One of the Major Projects is the city part on top of the Transit Center, the Transit Center itself and the improvements around that. The soda street scape improvements, rincon hill, there is a funding gap and a lot of the projects are ready to move forward. Our staff is working with the community and the other agencies to prioritize projects, thinking of them holistically. Theyre suitable for impact fees spending out of Transit Center. We set aside this money to enable that to happen. The last of the playing areas, visitation valley is not a playing area. This was created by the community and the supervisor from district 10 about ten years ago to leverage value out of the large scale projects planned in Executive Park, we the revenue that weve gotten thus far has been largely spent on the visitation valley library. A lot of the projects for which were expecting revenue have not paid their fees yet. We think, although we dont have a lot of money right now, we know when the money comes in, it will come in all at once with the schlage lock project. Were working with the community. We go out twice a year to identify projects. They honed the project list a little more to better define it to get it ready for when the money does come in. We will be working for the agencies for the money weve identified in the report in the next two years, to include it in their budget asks so theyre appropriated to so they can move forward. This is a yearly cycle. Spring and summer well start this all over again. As i mentioned before, on top of doing, identifying projects for impact of the revenue spending, well be working on the 10year capital plan for each of the areas that will look broadly at the need of the Community Benefits originally promise and that have come out of community processes to get a sense of where we are in impact fees and other potential sources. Other things were look at this next year, were going to be looking at doing additional inkind process improvement to get the agencies involved earlier, so there is buyin from them and earlier vetting. We are possibly looking at a role for ipic to not only be the body that helps determine how best to spend impact fees and how to roll them out, but also the cfds that have been implemented thus far and youll be talking about as well. We have the other thing that we might be looking at is central somma coming online, we had original mou with the agencies to implement eastern neighborhoods that had a couple of mechanisms to prioritize projects. Well be taking a fresh look at that. That concludes my presentation and im happy to answer questions. President hillis all right. We may have some, but first lets open up for Public Comment. Any Public Comment on the ipic report . Over head. Sue hess, im here to talk about western somma and open space. Its part of the report. The playground i didnt mark it on this map, its not marked. Its 6th and fulsome. Its right there. Page 17, 27 of your report talks about the somma recreation center. The Planning Commission has an obligation to do shadow analysis for projects that shadow rec park facilities. This facility according to page 27, the plans are to demolish the existing structure and construct a threestory Recreational Center in its place and make addition to the outdoor portions of the site. Basically, the Planning Commission and rec park look only at the rec center as a locked facility before 9 00 in the morning. So all the open space doesnt exist for any shadow analysis. Nothing, even though its a zero additional shadow permitted, everyone disregards it because the shadows that are cast by New Buildings dont affect places that are locked because theyre not a forecast. One of the factor. One of the things that i would urge ipic to do is to force information into the shadow analysis for what the hell project plans are to open the outdoors to kids. We have no places that are open space. Theyre next to people that live in very crowded conservative in the mission and chinatown that have locked recreation facilities. This is a travesty. The locking of open space and the nonanalysis of how shadows fall on the open space, because were soon going to do a change of the programming. And additionally open the outdoors so the outdoors can be used by the families that live in the market, is something that needs Planning Commission attention. And ipic is good for that. President hillis thank you, any additional Public Comments. Seeing none, we close Public Comment. Any commissioner comments or questions . Commissioner moore. Commissioner moore i want to acknowledge this would be an extraordinary piece of work. Im so glad we have this tool and are able to track it comprehensively and at those moments i wonder what would we do without computers . The one thing i would like to ask, what are the predictions for visitation valley and things are far slower than expected . Its hard for a planner to predict after something leaves his desk and all of the projects have left our desks. I know for Executive Park you approved the first half of that a year ago, shah lag rock, they just approved the first phase. And then well take entitlement about a year. We had assumed at this point we would have had a lot of the fees in from. The reason im saying it, its complicated to start with. Supervisor maxwell is the originator of the idea to tag it, but over the ten years, a lot of work has happened, including the approval pr