To fund biodiversity conservation, redirect subsidies from t

To fund biodiversity conservation, redirect subsidies from these three industries (commentary)


To fund biodiversity conservation, redirect subsidies from these three industries (commentary)
by Michelle Chong on 17 December 2020
Funding for conservation has been decimated by the COVID-19 pandemic, from sharp dips in ecotourism to decreases in charitable donations.
Rather than pursuing new sources of biodiversity funding, countries should consider eliminating taxpayer-funded subsidies for agriculture, forestry and fishing, which are the top industries driving species extinctions.
In 2019, subsidies for these economic activities exceeded the global total spend on biodiversity conservation by a factor of at least two.
This article is a commentary. The views expressed are those of the author, not necessarily Mongabay.

Related Keywords

Kyrgyzstan , , Paulson Institute , European Union , Cornell University , Biodiversity Finance Initiative , Snow Leopard , Nature Conservancy , Global Biodiversity Financing Gap , Agricultural Policy , Central Asia , Finance Initiative , Biodiversity Finance Plan , கிர்கிஸ்தான் , பால்சன் நிறுவனம் , ஐரோப்பிய தொழிற்சங்கம் , கார்னெல் பல்கலைக்கழகம் , பல்லுயிர் நிதி முயற்சி , பனி சிறுத்தை , இயற்கை பழமைவாதம் , உலகளாவிய பல்லுயிர் நிதி இடைவெளி , மைய ஆசியா , நிதி முயற்சி , பல்லுயிர் நிதி திட்டம் ,

© 2025 Vimarsana