Monday in parliament. The main news from westminster. Winter pressures in the nhs. The Health Secretary calls for an honest discussion about a and e departments. We are going to protect our four hour standard. We need to be clear it is a promise to sort out all Urgent Health problems within four hours, not all health problems, however minor. Plans to stop Domestic Abusers from Questioning Ex Partners in Family Courts. As a result of the family Court Process this extremely vulnerable woman needed weeks of medication and months of counselling to recover. She has now suffered this ordeal three times. And peers rally to the defence of englands universities. Universities have changed the world because of what they are. Because they are different and they are distinctive. It was the first day back at westminster for mps after the christmas break. They returned to news that the National Health service has not, however, had much of a break. The Health Secretaryjeremy hunt told the commons that it had been a tough christmas and that, with cold weather on the way, the Winter Pressures were likely to continue. Jeremy hunt also said it was time to rethink the nhs target that all patients attending accident and emergency should be seen within four hours. Tuesday after christmas was the busiest day in the history of the nhs. Some hospitals are reporting that A E Attendances are up to 30 higher compared to last year. I therefore want to set out how we intend to protect the service through an extremely challenging period and sustain it for the future. He said the nhs had made more extensive Winter Preparations than ever before. The result has been that this winter has already seen days when a e have treated a Record Number of people within four hours. And there have been fewer serious incidents declared that many expected. As chris hopson, head of nhs providers said, although there have been problems at some trusts, the system as a whole is doing better than last year. However there are a number of trusts where the situation has been extremely fragile. All of last weeks a e diverts happened happened at 19 trusts, of which four are in special measures. It is clear we need to have an honest discussion with the public about the purpose of a e departments. There is nowhere outside the uk that commits to all patients that we will sort out any health need within four hours. If we are going to protect our four hour standard we need to be clear that it is a commitment to sort out all Urgent Health problems within four hours, but not all problems, however minor. Labour said the nhs was in a worse state than the Health Secretary had suggested. 15 hospitals ran out of beds in one day in december. Several hospitals have warned they cant offer comprehensive care. Elderly patients have been left languishing on Hospital Trolleys in corridors sometimes for over 2a hours. And he says care is only falling over in a couple of places. I know la la land did well at the Golden Globes last night but i didnt realise the Secretary Of State was living there. Perhaps that is where he has been all weekend. Can he now confirm that the nhs is facing a Winter Crisis and the blame for this lies at the door of number ten Downing Street . With my background i know exactly what it is like when a e is swamped, when you do not have anywhere to put people. I do not think that the staff across nhs in england are afraid of us discussing this topic and weaponising it. They are in tears. They are exhausted. They are demoralised. They have never experienced a winter like this. Perhaps the Secretary Of State could explain why his figures suggest 19 diverts and only two trusts in serious problems, whereas what we are hearing, from the Nuffield Trust is 42 or 50 trusts who are diverting, which is a third. That means it is widespread. The minister seems to blame the public for overcrowding a e departments when he himself knows the reason The Public Go To A E is because they cant get to see their gp and social care is in crisis. Will he confirm that he has Just Announced another significant watering down of the four hour a e target following the watering down by the coalition in their first year in office in 2010 . And what is he personally doing to address the chronic long term underperformance of hospitals like that at worcester where two people died on trolleys, and plymouth, one of the hospitals that had to call In The Red Cross over the Christmas Period 7 let me just say to him i think probably because of the forum that we are in now he is misinterpreting what i have said. But it needs to be put right. Far from watering down the target i have today recommitted the government to that four hour target, injust the answer before he spoke. Maybe he was not listening but i said this was one of the best things about the nhs, that we have this four hour promise. But the public will go to the place where it is easier to get in front of a doctor quickly and if we dont recognise that there is an issue with the fact that a number of people who dont need to go to a es are using those a es, if we dont recognise that problem and address it then we wont make a es better for his constituents and mine. In her first speech of the year, the Prime Minister theresa may chose to focus on Mental Health services. She said Mental Health had been dangerously disregarded and announced plans to improve the capacity of schools to support children with Mental Health issues. Theresa may also said nearly £70 million would be invested in Online Services which enable people to carry out symptom checks. And there will be a review on how to support people with Mental Illnesses in the workplace. During the Health Secretarys statement on the nhs, mps had a chance to ask questions about the announcements on Mental Health services. We welcome measures to improve Mental Health services in this country as indeed we welcomed such announcements 12 months ago when the then Prime Minister made similar promises. But does the Secretary Of State not agree that if this Prime Minister wants to shine a light on Mental Health provision she should aim her torch at the governments record . 6,600 fewer nurses working in Mental Health. A reduction in Mental Health beds. 400 fewer doctors working in Mental Health and perhaps most disgracefully of all the raiding of childrens local Mental Health budgets in order to plug funding gaps in the wider nhs. I welcome the statement and also the Prime Ministers focus in the speech on Mental Health today. She spoke of holding the nhs leadership to account for the extra billion that we will be investing in Mental Health. Will the Secretary Of State set out in further detail how ccgs will be held to account for ensuring that that money gets to the front line, so that we can deliver progress on parity of esteem . Yes, i can absolutely do that. And it is important because we have had a patchy record in the nhs of making sure that money promised for Mental Health reaches the front line. The way that we intend to address this is by independently compiling 0fsted style ratings for every ccg in the country that actually highlights where Mental Health provision is inadequate. Jeremy hunt. Now, the government has promised to change the law so that the perpetrators of Domestic Abuse lose the right to question former partners during proceedings in Family Courts. The practice has been banned in the criminal courts. A labour mp peter kyle said allowing it to continue in Family Courts was wreaking untold devastation. I have spoken to numerous survivors of abuse whose accounts of torment under Cross Examination, often by convicted rapists, in the family court are devastating to hear, but impossible for most of us to even imagine. I have spoken to a woman who was cross examined by the man who was in jail for numerous counts of rape and abuse that left her unconscious and hospitalised. As a result of the family Court Process this extremely vulnerable woman needed weeks of medication and months of counselling to recover. She has now suffered this ordeal three times. I have spoken to the sister of a woman who was abused so greviously it resulted in her death. The convicted murderer then sued for custody of their child from prison where he was serving a Life Sentence for murder. He directly cross examined the sister of the woman he murdered, even having the grotesque nerve to ask, what makes you think you can be a parent to my child . Mr speaker, abuse is being continued, perpetuated, right under the Noses Ofjudges and police, the very institutions that should be protecting the vulnerable with every sinew of state power. The government agrees that the law needs to be changed. I want to make family Court Process safer for victims so they can advocate effectively for themselves and for the safety of their children . This cannot happen while a significant number of Domestic Abuse victims face Cross Examination by their abusers. The Lord Chancellor has requested urgent advice on how to put an end to this practice. This sort of Cross Examination is illegal in the criminal courts. I am determined to see it banned in Family Courts too. We are considering the most comprehensive and efficient way of making that happen, that will help Family Courts to concentrate on the key concerns for the family and always put the childrens interests first. Some mps said changes to legal aid meant that increasing numbers of people were forced to represent themselves. Members on both sides of the house have constituents who have been left devastated by the experience. That the government is doing something to now end this practice is welcome. But this is a clear admission that the legal aid cuts have caused this situation. Victims of Domestic Violence struggle to provide evidence of their abuse because frequently theyre not believed. And in some cases medical evidence is difficult to obtain. And the experience is made worse still because the abuser, also unable to get representation, is allowed to question them. Please look at rules in relation to legal aid because there is certainly strong anecdotal evidence from former colleagues of mine at the family bar and indeed the judiciary that there is a direct consequence and link between the rise in litigants in person and the changes to legal aid actually begun under the last labour government. But its this link between litigants in person that is causing so many of this. If he would at least look at it it may provide some of the solutions. As my honourable friend has rightly said this is a long standing issue but its one which has become particularly urgent, and where the cries for help from the judges and others have become more urgent. Thats why the government is tackling this issue. As Regards Litigants in person it is necessary to find a way of stopping them using proceedings to continue the abuse, and thats what we are aiming to do. The commons also paid tribute to jill saward, who died of a stroke last thursday. She became a campaigner on behalf of Sexual Assault victims after being raped during a burglary at her fathers vicarage in west london in 1986. Her local mp said she was instrumental in securing a ban on defendants accused of rape from cross examining victims in criminal courts. We were all shocked and saddened by the death of my constituent jill saward who campaigned tirelessly on behalf of victims of rape and Sexual Violence following her own horrific personal ordeal. The minister called jill saward a wonderful person and said he wanted the law to change in Family Courts. Youre watching Monday In Parliament with me, kristiina cooper. The government has been defeated in the House Of Lords over plans to change the way englands universities are run, set out in the Higher Education bill. Peers from different parties combined to vote in favour of an Opposition Proposal for the bill to define the powers and aims of universities. The bill is designed to make it easier for new colleges to award degrees and will introduce a regulator called the office for students. A succession of peers praised the achievements of englands universities. They are not one size fits all. They are not beholden to the state. They are not looking forward to launching themselves on the ftse 100. They are, to use a phrase of alan bennetts, just keeping on, keeping on, at a higher level in different but effective ways with fertile variations with their primary purpose, which is scholarship. So we must, from the start, and throughout the consideration of this bill, reassert and defend the prime values of our University Sector and resist the governments controlling plans to seek Central Control via its own appointed, unhappily named office for students. Could it be, my lords, that our universities have flourished and retained World Rankings because they have not been subjected to Government Interference . Within education, schools and colleges have suffered from changes imposed by different governments and by the churn of ministers seeking to make their mark, regardless of advice from professionals in the sector. Universities, for some years, had been relatively free of such assistance and they have flourished as a result. But one peer Thought Teaching Standards in some universities was poor. It is clear that in arts subjects, too often, large classes are taught by ph. Ds from overseas whose first language is not english and cant be understood and that, in the arts, there is a lack of proper framework, two or three essays per term for a student to prepare, otherwise to be left to read around in the library. The noble lord, lord krebs, said he had a quote. Well, somebody who wrote to me, my lords, about this debate said, i am effectively paying £9,000 per annum for the use of a good library. I think there are major shortcomings in accountability in our universities. There is a climate of lassitude in many of our universities on the path of academics in terms of their duties and obligations to their institution and to their students, and i think the government has quite correctly addressed that as an issue in putting this legislation before us. Universities have changed the world because of what they are, because they are different and they are distinctive, and that is why dictatorial governments take them over and close them down. Its why people care so much about how government deals with them, and we should make it clear what we believe a university is. This is the first major bill on Higher Education for a generation. Its going to have far reaching consequences. One of its aims, as weve heard, is to extend University Title considerably. Its a matter of great concern to me that this piece of legislation has so far made no attempt to define what a university is or its role in society more widely and particularly what we expect these new universities to do. But a former Minister Thought defining a university wouldnt work. My personal view is that the way in which we should be protecting universities is by putting obligations on governments and regulators to respect the autonomy of universities, not trying to define universities and put obligations on them. It is ordinary for institutions to compete, not to be the best or to have the best offerings, but to make the greatest profit, to do it in the most cheap, cheerful and economical way and, as we move, as the noble lord, lord gidden