Dynamic . Beijing would like to. See a more firmer us government that sticks see a more firmer us government that sticks to the one China Policy that sticks to the one China Policy. And while youre thinking about strategic ambiguity, china would like the us to ambiguity, china would like the us to he ambiguity, china would like the us to be firmer about stopping taiwah us to be firmer about stopping taiwan from being too proactive on safeguarding autonomy, and to he on safeguarding autonomy, and to be honest, if you look at this to be honest, if you look at this election, one big lesson of this this election, one big lesson of this election is the taiwanese people are moving the palooka taiwanese people are moving the Palooka Party more towards the centre Palooka Party more towards the centre. The kmt try to stay away centre. The kmt try to stay away from talking about china, did the away from talking about china, did the dpp tried to stay away from did the dpp tried to stay away from talking about identity, and the from talking about identity, and the tpp says, we are good for everything. What you can see is for everything. What you can see is everyone is trying to say, see is everyone is trying to say, we see is everyone is trying to say, we are less extreme than you think. Say, we are less extreme than you think, and we are not for china you think, and we are not for china or you think, and we are not for china or we you think, and we are not for china or we are not for us, and Ithink China or we are not for us, and i think everyone has also affirmed taiwans international relations, orforeign affirmed taiwans international relations, or Foreign Policy direction, which is taiwanese to connect with the world and needs to connect with the world and needs to to connect with the world and needs to better relationship with needs to better relationship with china and for that,