claim privilege that he didn't claim about the very same pile of information. whether it's just the differences, one is in text form and one is answering questions verbally about those texts. so, what information do you have, um, that you have learned today about these messages that the committee has, these 6,000 pages you refer to? >> it's really interesting. some of the stuff that he actually handed over, erin. according to the committee, among the things that they have received is, for example, one text exchange with an unnamed member of congress where meadows said, quote, i love it in a discussion about the possibility of appointing alternate electors in certain states. a plan that even this member acknowledged would be highly controversial. and that's not all. he also handed over, for example, an e-mail referencing a 38-page powerpoint presentation. it would be a briefing titled "election fraud, foreign interference, and options for january 6th." this is exactly the kind of stuff that the committee is going to be interested in, that they would want to ask him act. and clearly, he doesn't believe is privileged. so just not clear legally how he