accurate. now we've got this third set of data. i think really what's behind it is they don't have good altitude data and i think we will find as the investigation goes on that some of the persons who were supposed to be monitoring the radar were asleep at the switch. i think they simply don't have it and are trying to reconstruct it. >> shawn, quick last word. >> yeah. i agree with mary 100%. here's the deal. we talked about this three weeks ago. these data points are very, very suspect, right? so placing all of our hopes an all of our goals predicated on those data points, as we said weeks ago, is extremely challen challenging. and really we have to, you know, eye that data very, very carefully and realize the limitations that it really posse possesses. >> the question for investigators, if you're going to stick your neck out and speculate why speculate things that don't help the search when you could at least extend that curiosity to the families' questions and give them comfort.