missions forward. so as they go through this information, there may be other carry-on missions that are motivated by the intelligence that they gathered. again, you know he was a cfo, but i think it's interesting to see the way that isis reacted online because now maybe they're getting a clue that minimumization is better which you normally see with criminals anyway when they try to minimize the crime or what actually happened to them. but regard also we know what we did. our overwatch is such that once a mission is done we can really measure the impact that it actually had. >> all right. what do you think the next step is in -- as the u.s. tries to get a handle of isis? clearly, you know the leader would be on the top of the target list. but do you think it's crippling the organization by taking out the supportive roles deputies before going in for the kill, so