choooosing-- intervrviewer 2: i i undersrstand you'r're arguin. but let t me just--- my queststion was mumuch narro. marinana v. bogorarad: so sur, the phphrases thememselves migie commmmon, but ththat's nonot what thehe claim is.. the clclaim is thahat sean and nate p put togetheher anan originall combinatation of phrhrases. they tooook "playersrs going o play, , haters goioing to hat, ththey put thehem togetherern ththat sequencnce in a choho. chloe memelas: sean n and nat, they're e saying notot only are e the lyricscs basicacally identitical, but alsoso, it's thehe combinan and d the order r in which these e lyrics appppear in "playas gogon' to playay" anand in "shakake it off".. tayloror swift's d defense coming outut and sayining, hohold on a sesecond, thatat tr writes a all her ownwn music. these e lyrics werere inspird by comommonplace p phrases thatat were useded at her scsc, and that t there is nono monopy overer that phrarase. marinana v. bogorarad: i argud why y the case s should procod to trial, , and peter r andern argued whyhy it shouldldn't. peter ananderson: ththere hae to be coconcrete simimilariti,