that you heard testify, all interview mr. bryan. all of them have written summaries of their reports. i went through the five-page version of mr. seacrest. the versions of the other officers. not the transcripts. but their actual summaries. three police officers who know exactly what they are doing, interview mr. bryan. none of them interpret his words to suggest that he committed an aggravated assault. none of them interpreted his words to suggest that he was involved in any false imprisonment. none of them read -- none of them hear that in what he says. and i would humbly suggest to you that if three police officers interview mr. bryan for what turns out to be a total of hours. we had an argument about how long the transcripts were and what that would mean. i don't care how you break it down. three experienced police officers investigate mr. bryan. none of them summarized for their superiors flat bryan attempted to run over, strike or imprison mr. arbery. it's not there.