says, review the science, review the search and the locations and then plan for the next time when they would go out, which would probably be next year. but we're still off of that. >> if they do a complete review, a regrouping, as richard says, colleen, how surprised would you be if the technical data, how surprised would you be that we're looking at a totally wrong area, would that shock you? >> no, actually, it wouldn't shock me at all. i can point to other searches, notably the search for steve fosset, that if they looked for the data correctly, they may have revisited the area where they actually found him eventually. so these things happen, you know, we might be sitting on a piece of information that would lead us to the correct spot and it's going to take a careful