vimarsana.com
Home
Live Updates
Transcripts For CNNW Erin Burnett OutFront 20180823 23:00:00
Transcripts For CNNW Erin Burnett OutFront 20180823 23:00:00
CNNW Erin Burnett OutFront August 23, 2018 23:00:00
Erin Burnett stays ahead of the headlines, delivering a show that is indepth and informative. Also on this, just breaking tonight, minutes ago, the
Associated Press
is reporting that the
National Enquirer
kept a safe with documents on hush money payments and other killed stories that were damaging specifically to trump. A safe. Do you know anything about that . I actually dont know anything about it. I havent been at the company for quite a while. But then again, it wouldnt surprise me. Because when you have ammunition, it gives you a lot more ability to get to people who you want david pecker owns a stable of publications. Its not just the
National Enquirer
. And theres actually been stories of him using killing a story in the enquirer to get someone to do something with his other publications. So. All right. So carrie, lets talk about the law here. At the same time the
National Enquirer
was catching and killing these stories about trump, it was also taking on his opponents, hillary clinton, ted cruz, we just laid all of this out. Where the the legal line here . Where is the legal issue here that could cross the line into
Campaign Finance
violations by and
Michael Cohen
said that under oath this week. April, to you. I want to quote a former staffer at ami who told ronan farrow of
The New Yorker
when he did this big profile on pecker months ago, he said, in theory, you would think that trump has all the power in that relationship, but in fact, its pecker. He has the power to run these stories. He knows where the bodies are buried. Does pecker have the upper hand on the president here . Pecker has the upper hand and the president is not happy about that. You know, anytime that you
Dance With The Devil
or know something about what someone is doing, that person doesnt necessarily want it to be told. And right now, its about david pecker trying to save his own skin. Because how deep is david pecker . This president talks about and poppy, you said it. He talked about fake news and crafting news. And he, indeed, himself, as a civilian, was crafting news. Killing stories. And smearing peoples names. This does not bode well for this president. I mean, you dont know how far this goes. And its like every day, what level of crazy are we in . What level of reality show, white house reality are we in . It just keeps going and going. This president has something to fear. He has something to fear. Let me read to you, stu, something from gus winter, who sold us weekly to david pecker. This is what he told
The New Yorker
about a discussion that he had with pecker regarding then citizen trump. He said, quote this is what pecker was saying about trump, okay . He was painting donald as extremely loyal to him and he had no issue being loyal in return. He told me very bluntly that he had killed all sorts of stories for trump. You worked there hand in hand, leading kmupgs ining communi. Do you have any sense of other stories that would not reflect well on the president that were killed or caught and killed by pecker, by ami . Well, over the course of the relationship . Yeah. Sure there were stories that were caught and killed. Because when david pecker would that the prosecutors would have to file where theyd have to weigh, is it in the public interests for this person to be granted immunity . Right. And then the details of that would be would depend on the specific agreement that the prosecutors would have worked out with mr. Peckers lawyers and ami. So i dont think we quigt know enough publicly about what the scope of that
Immunity Agreement
is. In other words, whether he has agreed to provide information discreetly about these two particular women and their cases that are described in the
Cohen Document
s or whether his
Immunity Agreement
is much more broad. But the one other point. The important piece about what he has potentially to provide with respect to the
Cohen Document
whats in the
Cohen Document
s about the two women is whether or not donald trump knew that the purposes of the payments was to affect the election. The timing is certainly suspicious. Sure. As it was october and close to the election. But whether or not mr. Pecker actually can give prosecutors that information would be very important. Very prorimportant. So, april, as we all remember, last june, msnbc host
Joe Scarborough
and mike nicco, they claimed they went on the air and they claim, look, we were threatened by the white house, they said. They were told, according to them, if they didnt apologize to the president for some of their critical coverage, the
National Enquirer
would run some hit pieces on them and their former marriages, right . Right. Essentially, they were saying, this is blackmail. Just listen to this. We got a call that, hey, the
National Enquirer
is going to run a negative story against you guys and it was, you know, donald is friends with the president is friends with the guy that runs the
National Enquirer
. And they said, if you call the president up and you apologize for your coverage, then he will pick up the phone and basically spike this story. Well, they didnt do that. And april, as you know, the
National Enquirer
did run some negative stories about them. I mean, this, this sort of dirty way of doing business was all out in plain sight. Dirty way this is street politics. This is the straeet this is not even politics. This is a street game. Let me get something on you so i can hold you at bay and puppeteer you. You know, poppy, this is something that im very familiar with. You know, myself and two others were told that there were dossiers on us. This is what they try to do when they want to put you bring you in control. This is an administration and formally a civilian organization and
Circle Of Friends
who tried their best to keep you in line. This is what this administration does. They look up things on you, try to get dirt on you, and then try to smear you. The bottom line is, you know, this is what they do, this is not politics that we know. This is what donald trump, who was a ruthless businessman who is now president of the united states and has not necessarily changed, this is what he does. This is what he does. And if you see it one time, believe it. Stu, bottom line, youre the one on this television screen, none of us have worked with david pecker, you have, very closely with him, managing crises. Yeah. If youre the president tonight, you are worried, extremely worried, or not worried . I would be kind of worried. I do think at the end of the day, however kind of . Pecker will respond to whats better for him, not whats better for trump. So i guess as he evaluates all the things that are presented to him, hell make the choice thats better for david pecker. The guys a survivor. Hes outlasted many expectations of his demise and always landed on his feet. Thank you all for being here. Outfront next,
Jeff Sessions
Fighting Back
tonight against trump like never before. My next guest, a longtime friend of sessions. What set the
Attorney General
off today . Plus, breaking news,
The New Yorker
reporting trumps advisers have circulated this memo accusing former
Obama Staffers
of engaging in a
Conspiracy Theory
against them. The reporter who broke the story is outfront. And kmacongressman
Duncan Hunter
Leei Ileaving
Court Afte Pleading
not guilty to charges that he and his wife stole 250,000 from
Campaign Funds
for a lavish lifestyle. Is hunter blaming it all on his wife . Ahead. It senses your movement and automatically adjusts to keep you both comfortable. And now, all beds are on sale. Save 50 on the new sleep number 360 limited
Edition Smart
bed. Plus, free home delivery. Ends saturday. When mit rocked our world. Ailed we called usaa. And they greeted me as they always do. Sergeant baker, how are you . They took care of everything a to z. Having insurance is something everyone needs, but having usaa now thats a privilege. Where you can shop withvent confidence and convenience plus get these 4 benefits from kenmore at sears. Up to fifty percent off appliances with your sears card. Like this washer and dryer for 539. 99 each. And this refrigerator for 899. 99. Hurry in to sears today. Rewards me basically aeverywhere. Om so why am i hosting a dental convention after party in my vegas suite . Or wearing a fullbody wetsuit at this spa retreat . Or sliding into this ski lodge with my mini horse kevin . Because hotels. Com lets me do me, right . Sorry, the cold makes him a little horse. Hotels. Com. You do you and get rewarded. Youre wearing a hat. Thats funny. It may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. Otezla is associated with. An increased risk of depression. Tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts,. Or if these feelings develop. Some people taking otezla reported weight loss. Your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. Upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. Tell your doctor about your medicines and if youre pregnant or planning to be. Otezla. Show more of you. Introducing zero account fees for brokerage accounts. And zero minimums to open an account. At fidelity, those zeros really add up. Maybe ill win,
Saved By Zero
tonight,
Jeff Sessions
firing back at
President Trump
like never before. The war of words breaking out after these comments by the president about his
Attorney General
. I put an
Attorney General
that never took control of the
Justice Department
,
Jeff Sessions
. Never took control of the
Justice Department
and its sort of an incredible thing. Even my enemies say that
Jeff Sessions
should have told you that he was going to recuse himself. And then you wouldnt have put him in he took the job and then he said, im going to recuse myself. I said, what kind of a man is that . Within hours, sessions slammed those remarks saying in part, quote, i took control of the
Justice Department
the day i was sworn in, which is why we have had unprecedented success effectuating the president s agenda. While i am
Attorney General
, the actions of the department of justice will not be improperly influenced by political considerations. Wow. Phil mattingly is on capitol hill with more. Awkward alert, he then went to the white house for a meeting face to face with the president. Okay, theres that. And then theres a flurry of reaction on capitol hill tonight to all of this. What are you hearing . Reporter poppy, one of the most interesting elements to the day, we saw the first kind of crack in what had long been a united front on capitol hill saying, please dont do this. Its not worth it for a myriad of reasons. But
Lindsey Graham
said after the election, not now, but after the election, it is probably time for a new
Attorney General
. I will note, though, poppy, he does not speak for all republicans. And frankly, he was pretty much on his own there. Take a listen to some of the senators that i ran in to today. There would be a concern about a domino effect, you know, then what happens to rosenstein . Is this a way to go after the
Mueller Investigation
. So, its a big concern. I think it would be a mistake and i dont think it would be good for the country. Hes a man of integrity. Ive worked for him 20 years up here and you get to know people. And i wish him the best. Reporter now, poppy, let me explain the behind the scenes here, one thats really been prevalent for the last couple of months, and that is, what would the fallout be here. Essentially, it would shut down the senate. You heard senator jeff flake talk about the ramifications for the russia investigation. Firing somebody whos recused and trying to install somebody who wouldnt be recused to oversee the special counsel. Democrats would lose their mind and they would never be able to get someone confirmed. You have the potential fallout shortly before a midterm election. And the most interesting element of all of this, you mentioned it, the
Attorney General
was at the white house today for a prescheduled meeting. What we are told from both white house sources and
Justice Department
sources, the issue never even came up. So as you noted, kind of awkward. This is a dance thats been going on for several months. But the big difference today, you saw the
Attorney General
fire back. And interestingly enough, in that meeting, the president more or less sided with the
Attorney General
on a separate issue in terms of the future of criminal
Justice Reform
on capitol hill. One thing we know for sure, the vast majority of republicans including
Senate Republican
leadership do not want the president to do anything here. We also know that this fight is most likely going to continue, because it certainly
Hasnt He Would
held off on a weekly basis. Phil, appreciate all the reporting and getting that sound from republican senators on the hill. Outfront now, politics editor for the times, patrick healey, and
William Huntley
joins me, an
Alabama Attorney
who has known
Jeff Sessions
since 1997. William, youve known the ag for the better part of three decades. He has never before shot back in the way that he did today. And those words were very, very carefully chosen. 17 months of relentless attacks by the president. Why was today the straw that broke
The Camels Back
. I think today was the day that
Attorney General
decided that he finally needed to go public with the support of all of the employees of the
Department Of Justice
, because theres a large number of employees and they needed to know that the
Attorney General
supported and backed them and would prevent them and protect them from political influence. And thats what he did today. And i think he accomplished that very well. It was pretty clear hes had it. Republican senator
Lindsey Graham
today, as you just heard phil mentioned, said he believes that trump very well may replace sessions after the midterms. Heres why. Listen to this. Clearly,
Attorney General
sessions doesnt have the confidence of the president. After the election, i think there will be some serious discussions about a new
Attorney General
. Patrick, how significant to hear
Lindsey Graham
, who is a highranking republican on the judiciary committee, who would be a senator, who would have to confirm a new ag, how significant to hear that from him today . Its infant. I think there was an assumption that the senate would stand by sessions, a former senator himself, one of them, because they also knew that any kind of confirmation fight over the
Attorney General
would pull in mueller the investigation, pull in rod rosenstein. Theres so many
Ripple Effects
to this and its not the fight that the senate wants to have this winter. Willie, he has been,
Jeff Sessions
, just a virtual
Pun Punching Bag
for the president , okay . Lets remind people, lest they need it. Sessions should have never recused himself. And if he would if he was going to recuse himself, he should have told me before he took the job and i would have picked somebody else. Im very disappointed with the
Attorney General
. The
Attorney General
made a terrible mistake when he did this. He made what i consider to be a very terrible mistake for the country. How on earth has
Jeff Sessions
taken it this long . I mean, and how do these attacks personally impact him, willie . Jeff is a strong individual. I think he can take a lot of punishment and keep ticking. And i think thats what has happened. I think jeffs number one focus and number one goal was the
Department Of Justice
and all the employees that are impacted by it. And i think he was withholding any type of response or comment out of respect for the president and in order to respect the employees at the
Department Of Justice
. But i think it probably reached a point where the employees at the
Associated Press<\/a> is reporting that the
National Enquirer<\/a> kept a safe with documents on hush money payments and other killed stories that were damaging specifically to trump. A safe. Do you know anything about that . I actually dont know anything about it. I havent been at the company for quite a while. But then again, it wouldnt surprise me. Because when you have ammunition, it gives you a lot more ability to get to people who you want david pecker owns a stable of publications. Its not just the
National Enquirer<\/a>. And theres actually been stories of him using killing a story in the enquirer to get someone to do something with his other publications. So. All right. So carrie, lets talk about the law here. At the same time the
National Enquirer<\/a> was catching and killing these stories about trump, it was also taking on his opponents, hillary clinton, ted cruz, we just laid all of this out. Where the the legal line here . Where is the legal issue here that could cross the line into
Campaign Finance<\/a> violations by\r and
Michael Cohen<\/a> said that under oath this week. April, to you. I want to quote a former staffer at ami who told ronan farrow of
The New Yorker<\/a> when he did this big profile on pecker months ago, he said, in theory, you would think that trump has all the power in that relationship, but in fact, its pecker. He has the power to run these stories. He knows where the bodies are buried. Does pecker have the upper hand on the president here . Pecker has the upper hand and the president is not happy about that. You know, anytime that you
Dance With The Devil<\/a> or know something about what someone is doing, that person doesnt necessarily want it to be told. And right now, its about david pecker trying to save his own skin. Because how deep is david pecker . This president talks about and poppy, you said it. He talked about fake news and crafting news. And he, indeed, himself, as a civilian, was crafting news. Killing stories. And smearing peoples names. This does not bode well for this\rpresident. I mean, you dont know how far this goes. And its like every day, what level of crazy are we in . What level of reality show, white house reality are we in . It just keeps going and going. This president has something to fear. He has something to fear. Let me read to you, stu, something from gus winter, who sold us weekly to david pecker. This is what he told
The New Yorker<\/a> about a discussion that he had with pecker regarding then citizen trump. He said, quote this is what pecker was saying about trump, okay . He was painting donald as extremely loyal to him and he had no issue being loyal in return. He told me very bluntly that he had killed all sorts of stories for trump. You worked there hand in hand, leading kmupgs ining communi. Do you have any sense of other stories that would not reflect well on the president that were killed or caught and killed by pecker, by ami . Well, over the course of the relationship . Yeah. Sure there were stories that were caught and killed. Because when david pecker would\rthat the prosecutors would have to file where theyd have to weigh, is it in the public interests for this person to be granted immunity . Right. And then the details of that would be would depend on the specific agreement that the prosecutors would have worked out with mr. Peckers lawyers and ami. So i dont think we quigt know enough publicly about what the scope of that
Immunity Agreement<\/a> is. In other words, whether he has agreed to provide information discreetly about these two particular women and their cases that are described in the
Cohen Document<\/a>s or whether his
Immunity Agreement<\/a> is much more broad. But the one other point. The important piece about what he has potentially to provide with respect to the
Cohen Document<\/a> whats in the
Cohen Document<\/a>s about the two women is whether or not donald trump knew that the purposes of the payments was to affect the election. The timing is certainly suspicious. Sure. As it was october and close to the election. But whether or not mr. Pecker\ractually can give prosecutors that information would be very important. Very prorimportant. So, april, as we all remember, last june, msnbc host
Joe Scarborough<\/a> and mike nicco, they claimed they went on the air and they claim, look, we were threatened by the white house, they said. They were told, according to them, if they didnt apologize to the president for some of their critical coverage, the
National Enquirer<\/a> would run some hit pieces on them and their former marriages, right . Right. Essentially, they were saying, this is blackmail. Just listen to this. We got a call that, hey, the
National Enquirer<\/a> is going to run a negative story against you guys and it was, you know, donald is friends with the president is friends with the guy that runs the
National Enquirer<\/a>. And they said, if you call the president up and you apologize for your coverage, then he will pick up the phone and basically spike this story. Well, they didnt do that. And april, as you know, the\r
National Enquirer<\/a> did run some negative stories about them. I mean, this, this sort of dirty way of doing business was all out in plain sight. Dirty way this is street politics. This is the straeet this is not even politics. This is a street game. Let me get something on you so i can hold you at bay and puppeteer you. You know, poppy, this is something that im very familiar with. You know, myself and two others were told that there were dossiers on us. This is what they try to do when they want to put you bring you in control. This is an administration and formally a civilian organization and
Circle Of Friends<\/a> who tried their best to keep you in line. This is what this administration does. They look up things on you, try to get dirt on you, and then try to smear you. The bottom line is, you know, this is what they do, this is not politics that we know. This is what donald trump, who was a ruthless businessman who is now president of the united\rstates and has not necessarily changed, this is what he does. This is what he does. And if you see it one time, believe it. Stu, bottom line, youre the one on this television screen, none of us have worked with david pecker, you have, very closely with him, managing crises. Yeah. If youre the president tonight, you are worried, extremely worried, or not worried . I would be kind of worried. I do think at the end of the day, however kind of . Pecker will respond to whats better for him, not whats better for trump. So i guess as he evaluates all the things that are presented to him, hell make the choice thats better for david pecker. The guys a survivor. Hes outlasted many expectations of his demise and always landed on his feet. Thank you all for being here. Outfront next,
Jeff Sessions<\/a>
Fighting Back<\/a> tonight against trump like never before. My next guest, a longtime friend of sessions. What set the
Attorney General<\/a>\roff today . Plus, breaking news,
The New Yorker<\/a> reporting trumps advisers have circulated this memo accusing former
Obama Staffers<\/a> of engaging in a
Conspiracy Theory<\/a> against them. The reporter who broke the story is outfront. And kmacongressman
Duncan Hunter<\/a>
Leei Ileaving<\/a>
Court Afte Pleading<\/a> not guilty to charges that he and his wife stole 250,000 from
Campaign Funds<\/a> for a lavish lifestyle. Is hunter blaming it all on his wife . Ahead. It senses your movement and automatically adjusts to keep you both comfortable. And now, all beds are on sale. Save 50 on the new sleep number 360 limited
Edition Smart<\/a> bed. Plus, free home delivery. Ends saturday. When mit rocked our world. Ailed we called usaa. And they greeted me as they always do. Sergeant baker, how are you . They took care of everything a to z. Having insurance is something everyone needs, but having usaa now thats a privilege. Where you can shop withvent confidence and convenience plus get these 4 benefits from kenmore at sears. Up to fifty percent off appliances with your sears card. Like this washer and dryer for 539. 99 each. And this refrigerator for 899. 99. Hurry in to sears today. Rewards me basically aeverywhere. Om so why am i hosting a dental convention after party in my vegas suite . Or wearing a fullbody wetsuit at this spa retreat . Or sliding into this ski lodge with my mini horse kevin . Because hotels. Com lets me do me, right . Sorry, the cold makes him a little horse. Hotels. Com. You do you and get rewarded. Youre wearing a hat. Thats funny. It may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. Otezla is associated with. An increased risk of depression. Tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts,. Or if these feelings develop. Some people taking otezla reported weight loss. Your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. Upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. Tell your doctor about your medicines and if youre pregnant or planning to be. Otezla. Show more of you. Introducing zero account fees for brokerage accounts. And zero minimums to open an account. At fidelity, those zeros really add up. Maybe ill win,
Saved By Zero<\/a> \rtonight,
Jeff Sessions<\/a> firing back at
President Trump<\/a> like never before. The war of words breaking out after these comments by the president about his
Attorney General<\/a>. I put an
Attorney General<\/a> that never took control of the
Justice Department<\/a>,
Jeff Sessions<\/a>. Never took control of the
Justice Department<\/a> and its sort of an incredible thing. Even my enemies say that
Jeff Sessions<\/a> should have told you that he was going to recuse himself. And then you wouldnt have put him in he took the job and then he said, im going to recuse myself. I said, what kind of a man is that . Within hours, sessions slammed those remarks saying in part, quote, i took control of the
Justice Department<\/a> the day i was sworn in, which is why we have had unprecedented success effectuating the president s agenda. While i am
Attorney General<\/a>, the actions of the department of\rjustice will not be improperly influenced by political considerations. Wow. Phil mattingly is on capitol hill with more. Awkward alert, he then went to the white house for a meeting face to face with the president. Okay, theres that. And then theres a flurry of reaction on capitol hill tonight to all of this. What are you hearing . Reporter poppy, one of the most interesting elements to the day, we saw the first kind of crack in what had long been a united front on capitol hill saying, please dont do this. Its not worth it for a myriad of reasons. But
Lindsey Graham<\/a> said after the election, not now, but after the election, it is probably time for a new
Attorney General<\/a>. I will note, though, poppy, he does not speak for all republicans. And frankly, he was pretty much on his own there. Take a listen to some of the senators that i ran in to today. There would be a concern about a domino effect, you know, then what happens to rosenstein . Is this a way to go after the
Mueller Investigation<\/a> . So, its a big concern. I think it would be a mistake and i dont think it would be good for the country. Hes a man of integrity. Ive worked for him 20 years up here and you get to know people. And i wish him the best. Reporter now, poppy, let me explain the behind the scenes here, one thats really been prevalent for the last couple of months, and that is, what would the fallout be here. Essentially, it would shut down the senate. You heard senator jeff flake talk about the ramifications for the russia investigation. Firing somebody whos recused and trying to install somebody who wouldnt be recused to oversee the special counsel. Democrats would lose their mind and they would never be able to get someone confirmed. You have the potential fallout shortly before a midterm election. And the most interesting element of all of this, you mentioned it, the
Attorney General<\/a> was at the white house today for a prescheduled meeting. What we are told from both white house sources and
Justice Department<\/a> sources, the issue never even came up. So as you noted, kind of awkward. This is a dance thats been going on for several months. But the big difference today, you saw the
Attorney General<\/a> fire back. And interestingly enough, in\rthat meeting, the president more or less sided with the
Attorney General<\/a> on a separate issue in terms of the future of criminal
Justice Reform<\/a> on capitol hill. One thing we know for sure, the vast majority of republicans including
Senate Republican<\/a> leadership do not want the president to do anything here. We also know that this fight is most likely going to continue, because it certainly
Hasnt He Would<\/a> held off on a weekly basis. Phil, appreciate all the reporting and getting that sound from republican senators on the hill. Outfront now, politics editor for the times, patrick healey, and
William Huntley<\/a> joins me, an
Alabama Attorney<\/a> who has known
Jeff Sessions<\/a> since 1997. William, youve known the ag for the better part of three decades. He has never before shot back in the way that he did today. And those words were very, very carefully chosen. 17 months of relentless attacks by the president. Why was today the straw that broke
The Camels Back<\/a> . I think today was the day\rthat
Attorney General<\/a> decided that he finally needed to go public with the support of all of the employees of the
Department Of Justice<\/a>, because theres a large number of employees and they needed to know that the
Attorney General<\/a> supported and backed them and would prevent them and protect them from political influence. And thats what he did today. And i think he accomplished that very well. It was pretty clear hes had it. Republican senator
Lindsey Graham<\/a> today, as you just heard phil mentioned, said he believes that trump very well may replace sessions after the midterms. Heres why. Listen to this. Clearly,
Attorney General<\/a> sessions doesnt have the confidence of the president. After the election, i think there will be some serious discussions about a new
Attorney General<\/a>. Patrick, how significant to hear
Lindsey Graham<\/a>, who is a highranking republican on the judiciary committee, who would be a senator, who would have to confirm a new ag, how significant to hear that from him today . Its infant. I think there was an assumption that the senate would stand by sessions, a former senator himself, one of them, because\rthey also knew that any kind of confirmation fight over the
Attorney General<\/a> would pull in mueller the investigation, pull in rod rosenstein. Theres so many
Ripple Effects<\/a> to this and its not the fight that the senate wants to have this winter. Willie, he has been,
Jeff Sessions<\/a>, just a virtual
Pun Punching Bag<\/a> for the president , okay . Lets remind people, lest they need it. Sessions should have never recused himself. And if he would if he was going to recuse himself, he should have told me before he took the job and i would have picked somebody else. Im very disappointed with the
Attorney General<\/a>. The
Attorney General<\/a> made a terrible mistake when he did this. He made what i consider to be a very terrible mistake for the country. How on earth has
Jeff Sessions<\/a> taken it this long . I mean, and how do these attacks personally impact him, willie . Jeff is a strong individual. I think he can take a lot of\rpunishment and keep ticking. And i think thats what has happened. I think jeffs number one focus and number one goal was the
Department Of Justice<\/a> and all the employees that are impacted by it. And i think he was withholding any type of response or comment out of respect for the president and in order to respect the employees at the
Department Of Justice<\/a>. But i think it probably reached a point where the employees at the
Department Of Justice<\/a> probably thought that they had been abandoned. If they would have been subjected to any type of political ramifications. Thats interesting. So youre saying, its not about him and his feelings, he can take this. Its about the people that work for him. I mean, patrick, there is a new tone today. Because its not just this statement saying, you know, ive been running this place since the day i was appointed. Also, a source tells cnn that the
Attorney General<\/a> said, you know, im not going to be quote,
Blackmailed Into<\/a> supporting a criminal
Justice Reform<\/a> bill that i dont support, right . Hes against taking away\rmandatory minimum sentencing. Right. He opposes the president , jared kushner, on that. Is it possible in your mind that the president may actually respect
Jeff Sessions<\/a> more after today for that comment, for the statement he put out . Because we have not seen trump punch back. Right, right. Trump, the worst insult that trump thinks he can give to someone is sort of questioning their manhood. You know, what kind of man is this . And i think in some ways, sort of seeing
Jeff Sessions<\/a> stand up and basically saying, im not going to be improperly influenced, its a strong im not going to be your punching bag. Im not going to be your punching bag or whipping boy. But at the same time, the whole notion of improper influence really does bother trump. He sees all of these people, the
Cabinet Secretaries<\/a> and toeratty general as working for him. They dont. They work for the american people. But from his point of view, the time had kind of come to say, you know, it was kind of a shot across the bow to the white house, to the senate. Im not going to be pushed\raround, im not going to be
Blackmailed Into<\/a> this. And improper influence, and those words were chosen very carefully. Totally. Every word of that statement. Right. And this is part of the
Critique Criticism<\/a> of the
Trump White House<\/a>. That essentially, you know, obstruction of justice, part of that is about getting in the face of your enemies and sort of shutting down investigations, pressuring, you know,
Government Officials<\/a> who do you think he works for . Whos the loyalty to . To the american taxpayer that pays you or to the president directly . Willie, before we go, because you have known
Jeff Sessions<\/a> for so long, do you think he would step aside voluntarily . No. I believe jeff believes in the
Heart And Soul<\/a> of the
Department Of Justice<\/a>. I know this is probably his dream job, because he has an opportunity to impact so many lives. And i just dont think that he would voluntarily step aside. I dont think that is part of the makeup of
Jeff Sessions<\/a>. Thank you both for being here, willie. Nice to have you, patrick, as well. All right. Breaking news next. The new yorker reporting tonight that the
Trump White House<\/a> circulated a memo accusing former
Obama Staffers<\/a> of conspiring against them. And longtime
Trump Supporters<\/a> on what would change their minds. En. To give you the protein you need with less of the sugar you dont. Ill take that. [cheers] 30 grams of protein and 1 gram of sugar. New ensure max protein. In two great flavors. You shouldnt be rushed into booking a hotel. With expedias addon advantage, booking a
Flight Unlocks<\/a> discounts on select hotels until the day you leave for your trip. Addon advantage. Only when you book with expedia. Does it look like im done . Shouldnt you be at work . [ mockingly ] shouldnt you be at work . Todd. Hold on. [ engine revs ] arcade game fist pump your real bikes all fixed. Man, you guys are good well, we are the numberone
Motorcycle Insurer<\/a> in the country. Wait. You have a real motorcycle . And real insurance, with 24hour customer support. Arcade game wipeout oh well. I retire as champion. Game hog champion. Im a small business, but i have. Big dreams. And big plans. So how do i make the efforts of 8 employees. Feel like 50 . How can i share new plans virtually . How can i download an efile . Virtual tours . Zipfile . Really big files . In seconds, not minutes. Just like that. Like everything. The answer is simple. Ill do what ive always done. Dream more, dream faster, and above all. Now, ill dream gig. Now more businesses, in more places, can afford to dream gig. Comcast, building americas largest gigspeed network. Breaking news. A new report tonight in
The New Yorker<\/a> revealing that advisers to
President Trump<\/a> believed that former obama aides were engaged in coordinated attacks to undermine trumps
Foreign Policy<\/a>. It is detailed in a memo from last year, a memo called the echo chamber, which says in\rpart, and i quote, some of the members of the network refer to themselves as the resistance. They are the same obama loyalists using the same
Media Outlets<\/a> and the same allied journalists who promote their narrative of u. S. Foreign policy. Outfront now, one of the authors of that piece, adam entist joins me. Adam, it is fascinating, it is indepth, and parts of it are just stunning. Tell us more about this. Well, i think the thing that really struck me about the memo is the similarity that it has to what a u. S. Military
Intelligence Officer<\/a> would write about an
Insurgent Network<\/a> in iraq and afghanistan. The language that is used in this memo really, i think, captures the psychology of the author and a
Certain Group<\/a> of people inside of the
Trump White House<\/a> in early 2017, who felt like they were encircled by opponents, that were both members of the
Obama Administration<\/a>, former members, and what they referred to as holdovers. Career professionals inside the white house, who did not leave when the
Obama Administration<\/a> left town. Right. Talk to us about who was named. Ben rhodes, for example, a very prominent figure in the
Obama White House<\/a> was named throughout this and their response to this. Yeah. So the, you know, names like you said,bo ben rhodes, it names collin call, and hes identified in this as the ops chief, an operational chief, again, using the language of a
Military Analysis<\/a> of an insurgency. Their analysis was there was no organization and this was a fever dream by those in the white house. That said, in defense slightly in defense of those who believed what was in the memo, they you can understand why nef they felt besieged during this period. There were a lot of attacks, there were a lot of leaks that were coming out that were very damaging and hurtful to their agenda that they were seeking to advance. So you can sort of put yourself a little bit in their shoes and understand why they felt that encirclement. So given your reporting, what are current members of the
Trump Administration<\/a> because this was at really high levels. This was circulating around the nsc, what are they saying tonight . Theyre declining comment on this. I think the news we had earlier last week about john brennan and his security clearance, this is a function of a similar dynamic. Which is this deep suspicion within this white house, held by this president , but also by some of his advisers, some of whom have since left the white house, that there is a conspiracy against them that involves former members of the
Obama Administration<\/a> trying at every turn, working with what they describe as their allies in the media to undermine the administration. And what trump did not do in 2017 against john brennan and other members of the former
Obama Administration<\/a>, he seems\rmore willing to do now in 2018, in part because some of the advisers who told him not to retaliate are no longer there. Thats a very important point. Fascinating reporting, important reporting, adam entis, thank you. Pleasure. Outfront now, denny heck, he sits on the house intel committee. Nice to have you this evening. And before we get into other issues, let me get your take on this new reporting from
The New Yorker<\/a>. Well, i dont think anybody should be surprised. This administration has been marked by daep,
Deep Chronic Suspicion<\/a> of others since its beginning. Theres another word for that, paranoia. Theyve been
Dog Whistling<\/a> to the qanon
Conspiracy Network<\/a> since day one. I think actually whats more interesting about it is, what happens to an administration that is deeply suspicious, if not paranoid and given to
Conspiracy Theories<\/a> when the pressure really gets on. Because clearly, the walls are closing in on this administration. And we have all read or remember what happened to the last days of the
Nixon White House<\/a>, what\rhappened to that to the dynamic and the psychology of the people in the inner circle then. So i think thats the more interesting question. People give in to
Conspiracy Theories<\/a>. What happens when the heats on and the heat is on. Ill get back to your comment on the last days of the
Nixon White House<\/a> in a moment. But on this reporting, before we move on, just to push back a little bit, you have seen a complete dismantling of every part of the
Obama Administration<\/a>s
Foreign Policy<\/a> that this president can undo without congress, essentially, right . The paris climate accord, the iran nuclear agreement. Reason for former officials to fight in a coordinated way . Last time i checked, poppy, they had a
First Amendment<\/a> right to dissent and disagree with that, but thats not really whats being written up about here by adam in a superb piece of journalism. This is about a
Conspiracy Theory<\/a> that this is super organized and that all of the dots are connected and that the moves on a daily basis are coordinated by some kind of\rpuppet master and i know ben rhodes, i know jake sullivan. Nothing could be farther from the truth. All right. So lets get back to your comment about saying this is a bit analogous to the last days of the
Nixon White House<\/a>. And obviously, youre pointing to impeachment. Today, the president was asked about impeachment. Heres what he said. If the democrats take back power, do you believe they will try to impeach you . Well, you know, i guess its
Something Like<\/a> high crimes and all i dont know how you can impeach somebody whos done a great job . Ill tell you what, if i ever got impeached, i think the market would crash. Ping everybody would be very poor. As someone who would vote on articles of impeachment, should they be brought in the house . Whats your reaction to that . So first of all, can i stand up in defense of poor
Vice President<\/a> pence, who evidently the president
President Trump<\/a> is implying would not be able to assume would crash the economy, was\rthe implication there. Right. Under then newly ascended president pence. Im going to stand up for president pence. I dont think that would necessarily happen. Look, the only people talking about impeachment are the republicans. You dont hear democrats talking about this you hear some. You hear some. Well, but not on any kind of a scale that would suggest that this is around the corner. Look, i said last april on this network, poppy, that i actually thought the thing that ought to happen now that is analogous to the
Nixon Administration<\/a> is that the president ought to be talking with his god and his family and his self about the possibility of a resignation. What is different between now and then is that we had a couple of very principled republican members of the
United States<\/a> senate, notably
Barry Goldwater<\/a> and howard baker who went to him and said, it is over, mr. President , it is time for you to resign. But the walls are closing in on
President Trump<\/a>. I confidently suggest to you that tuesday, august 21st, 2018,\rwill go down as a watershed day with the guilty convictions of manafort and the
Michael Cohen<\/a> plea bargain deal. We now have the most corrupt administration in modern history. This is a factual statement. I dont think its a subjective interpretation. Because you bring up howard baker, i mean, i have heard very little from many republicans in congress right now. You know, especially on the senate side. And, you know, i get that the house is on recess, but youre still doing an interview. I mean, who is there someone that is the howard baker of this moment who will say, what did you know and when did you know it . Do you see that
Turning Point<\/a> in your republican colleagues right now . I absolutely believe that there are members of the
United States<\/a> senate in the republican conference who could step up and do this. But the question really is, will they step up and do this . And that remainsto be een. I appreciate your time tonight, congressman. Thanks for being with me. Youre welcome. Outfront next, after a week of legal drama for the president , what is the red line for his supporters . The president better watch about the pardons, because with the pardons that he does that, it looks like it was set up by him. And republican congressman
Duncan Hunter<\/a> and his wife in
Court Pleading<\/a> not guilty to charges that he stoe stole
Campaign Funds<\/a> for lavish ships and shopping sprees. Is hunter going to throw his wife under the bus . Now thats eatin good in the neighborhood. Comdeeper than the oceanrld as unfathomable as the universe a world that doesnt exist outside you, but within you where
Breakthrough Science<\/a> is replacing chemotherapy with immunotherapy where we can now attack the causes of disease not just the symptoms. Where medicines once produced for all, are now designed to fit you. Today, 140,000 biopharmaceutical researchers go boldly to discover treatments and cures unimaginable ten years ago and theyre on the verge of more tomorrow. 2016. In the aftermath of the legal bombshells involving trumps former attorney
Michael Cohen<\/a> and
Campaign Chair<\/a>
Paul Manafort<\/a>, here in liucerne, voters like ann marie is so encouraged by the economy, she says she can overlook allegations of trumps infidelity. Unless the money came from
Campaign Funds<\/a>, then i dont think that its good. Reporter i see. So thats where you draw that sort of line. Yes. Reporter i see. But i would still vote for him again. Reporter trumps win in this part of the state is also thanks in part to democrats like eileen and richard sorocas. This is all from
President Obama<\/a>s campaign. Reporter who after voting twice for
President Obama<\/a> switched their vote to trump. This is what the couple told me weeks after trumps inauguration. Youve got to get a businessman in here, get the\rdeficit down. Reporter the couple stands by their decision. Our retirement is in the stock market and the stock market has been growing for quite a while now, so im sort of happy whats happening with the economy. Reporter they say the legal crises involving cohen and manafort as a side show and many others here agree. The investigations were supposed to be about russia interference in our elections. And so far, ive seen nothing concerning that. As a candidate, trump infamously joked about the dedication of his supporters. They say i have the most loyal people. Did you ever see that . Where i could stand in the middle of fifth avenue and shoot somebody and i wouldnt lose any voters, okay . Its like incredible. Reporter loyalty only goes so far. And supporters here say it could be tested if trump began issuing pardons. Oh, the pardons. I dont agree with them. Reporter
Barbershop Owner Aldo Satorio<\/a> is an independent\rvoter who supported trump. If the pardons started coming down, would that change your mind about voting for him . Thats going to be my decision. That would be in the decision, sure. Sure, also mine. The president better watch it about the pardons. Because with the pardons, that he does that, it looks like it was set up by him with the last couple of tweets that he had, where he sticks up for, who is it the guy out there theyre talking about. Manafort. He says hes a great guy and hes wonderful and everything else. And hes kind of sending the message that if you stick with me, i will pardon you. Reporter and poppy, in addition to the pardons, the other line in the sand for many of the
Trump Supporters<\/a> that we spoke to would be if the
Mueller Investigation<\/a> found any collusion between members of the
Trump Campaign<\/a> and russians. Again, that would be another line in the sand for many of the folks we spoke to here. But they also expressed a great deal of frustration that the
Mueller Investigation<\/a> had not wrapped up yet. Poppy . That was a fascinating piece,\rjason. Thank you so much for that. Lets talk about it. Outfront now, rob astorino, who is serving on the trump 2020 advisory board. He is a new cnn contributor. And jen psaki, former
White House Communications<\/a> director for former
President Obama<\/a>. Nice to have you both here. Great to be here. Good to have you. So rob, to you first. The voters were clear in that piece. It was fascinating. I didnt know that they would say that and they would be so concerned about potential pardons here, but they were clear thats a red line. Still tonight, the white house, and i quote, sarah sanders, the president has not made a decision on pardoning
Paul Manafort<\/a> or anyone else. Thats not a no. In your opinion, should the
Trump White House<\/a> right now close the door on a possible manafort pardon right now . I dont think it matters right now, because the action is going to speak. And if he doesnt do it or at some point he comes out and says, no, im not going to do it, or doesnt ever speak about it again, its a closed issue. Why do you think it doesnt matter when all of those trump voters just told us it does matter. I agree with them. I dont think he should. Not because he cant. He has absolute power to do that. Any president does. But why even give them the rue to speculate or worry. I dont think he should. I honestly think he should not ever even consider it or issue a pardon. Because i think that sends the wrong message. All right, jen, to you, would a president ial pardon of
Paul Manafort<\/a> be a gift to democrats . Yes, in the sense that it would are continue to energize democratic voters about how outrageous this violation of the rule of law is. And it might make, as we just saw in that piece, some independent voters, some people who are on the
Line Question<\/a> whether this is a guy who is draining the swamp or if hes a part of this, you know,
Corrupt Washington<\/a> that they hate so much. I mean, just on that point, bob, to you, the swamp, right, that the president said he was going to drain,
Paul Manafort<\/a> was convicted by a jury of his peers of some pretty horrible things, right . Of defrauding american taxpayers. And the president still called him a good guy who he feels bad for. Isnt that bringing the swamp right along with you. Well, i think what he meant there, and maybe ill do a trump translation, he worked with him, he helped him, and so he thinks hes a good guy. He should have said, comma, who did a bad thing. And you cant excuse what he did. Okay, i just need to know that you work on the trump 2020 advisory committee, and therefore you have signed an nda that includes a no nondisparagement clause. So you cant really tell me, then you really dont believe the president s own words, hes a good guy . About
Paul Manafort<\/a>. Are you talking about
Paul Manafort<\/a> . Yeah. No, look, ive known people, have you ever met somebody that you knew well or knew or worked with that became a convicted felon . No. Who did something wrong. Who became a convicted felon . No. Nor would i say after the fact that they defrauded the american people, theyre a good person. They can be a good person who did a bad thing. We can make that distinction. Eight counts. Yeah. You know how many people commit\rfraud who evade taxes . Im not saying its the right thing. I do not poppy, let me get this straight. It is not a good thing and he should go to jail for what he did. Youre down okay, jen psaki, your take . I think theres a really dangerous lowering of the bar here of whats acceptable. People have served in governments for the white house and for the federal government for hundreds of years and we have
Trump Supporters<\/a> what is happening in this country . Of course,
Paul Manafort<\/a> is a bad guy and trump is trying to keep him in his corner. We all know whats happening there. I dont think its an easy thing for him to explain especially for his recorders. Every time a president issues a pardon, its somebody who did a bad thing. Theyre paying their debt to society. I think we can all agree theres a big difference between pardoning. For this reason or that reason im giving you a pardon. Theres a big difference between pardoning somebody who served time for dealing drugs and served 30 years and served\ran extended period of time and pardoning someone who has violated and potentially colluded with russia, we dont know yet. There are huge differences here. Pardoning somebody like
Paul Manafort<\/a>, this is trump again putting out there hes above the law. Thats what people dont like about it. You say, look, you know people who have done this, done a lot of bad things. Shouldnt there be a different standard this high in politics . Shouldnt there be a different standard if youre running a campaign for five critical months . Yes. Im not making any excuse and neither are those in pennsylvania. Heres the big issue, i think voters are understanding that. It has nothing to do with russia at this point that we know of and it has nothing to do with the campaign of
President Trump<\/a>, everything to do with what he\rdid 10 years ago and paying those prices. Money he got from the
Ukrainian Government<\/a> hes wrong. That was propped up by the putin regime. By the way, hes the man who led the change of the republican platform, having to do with ukraine and russia at the rnc. And in republican politics back to president ford. I get that. That does not change there are ties to russia when you look at the money. Thats what im saying. Not to do with the collusion what mueller is looking into. We have no facts whatsoever. What he went to jail or will go to jail for is for tax evasion and hiding money. He should go to jail for that. He faces
Money Laundering<\/a> charges in three weeks in washington, d. C. Thank you. Nice to have you. Important conversation. Jen, thank you for being here as well. Thank you. Republican congressman,
Duncan Hunter<\/a>, pleading not guilty to misusing a quarter of a
Million Dollars<\/a> in
Campaign Funds<\/a>. Hunter defiant today as he\rwalked into court to protesters shouting, lock him up. Out front. Instead of the halls of congress, representative,
Duncan Hunter<\/a>, entered the halls of justice in san diego, he and his wife making their
First Court Appearance<\/a> after being indicted by a federal grand jury, accused of stealing more than 250,000 of
Campaign Funds<\/a> to furnish a lavish lifestyle including a 14,000 family trip to italy, 11,000 at costco, 3,000 on fast food and hundreds of dollars on clothing, some of which prosecutors say they tried to pawn off as charity for wounded veterans. Both remained defiant, pleading ng to the 60 counts against them. The day before court, representative hunter went on the attack against the justice\rdepartment. I paid the money back. This is political, period. Reporter that is also what he told the crowd at a town hall in 2017. I am a representative to you and the
Campaign Finance<\/a> stuff, i was not watching it close enough. I have fixed it now. Its all straightened out. Reporter a grand jury didnt see it that way. Prosecutors said even his
Campaign Staffers<\/a> kept warning the couple they were violating the law. The assistant u. S. Attorney said the couple wasnt a
Flight Risk Due<\/a> in part to their dire financial condition. Hunter racked up 137,000 in
Overdraft Fees<\/a> on his personal accounts, hunter as much as admitting his family is going through financial troubles. Theres nothing illegal about being poor. I dont think theres anything illegal about not having money in your bank account. Reporter there is something illegal about using
Campaign Funds<\/a> to shore up your finances. Hes paid 174,000 out of tax coffers. Few would call that poor. Outside the court, democratic voters make clear they are sickened at the charges and gunning for his seat. His democratic opponent says he commenced hunter as a former marine who served his country abroad. He says hunter appears to have served himself during his time in washington. I think washington chewed him up and spat him out and engulfed him in the corruption that has plagued washington too long. I think the voters come november will change that and hope to have real representation for the first time in a long time. Reporter
Something Else<\/a> interesting happened inside and outside court. We noticed that mr. Hunter and his wife entered at different times in different ways and they did not sit together while in court, and when representative hunter was asked about those\rthousands of overdrafts to his account, he seemed to put that on his wife saying while he was overseas serving in the marines he gave her power of attorney over those accounts and he was simply unsure about those details. Fascinating development. Thank you very much, sarah. Up next, jeanne moos on trumps late night all caps twitter rant. Up to fifty percent off appliances with your sears card. Like this washer and dryer for 539. 99 each. And this refrigerator for 899. 99. Hurry in to sears today. Let your perfect drive come together during the final days of the
Lincoln Summer Invitation<\/a> event get 0 apr on select 2018 lincoln models\rplus
One Thousand Dollars<\/a> bonus cash. Well leave the light on for you. Reporter its 1 10 a. M. , do\ryou know where your president is . Hes tweeting, with the caps lock
On No Collusion<\/a> rigged witch hunt. At a recent rally the coughed up five no collusions in 10 seconds. Where is the collusion . Theyre still looking for collusion. Theyre still looking for collusion. Find some collusion. We want to find the collusion. Reporter when critics found no collusion at 1 10 a. M. In a tweet, they colluded to mock him in tweets. Its 1 10 a. M. And the president is in an all caps scream. Journalist
Howard Fineman<\/a> says nothing says innocent like a random 1 00 all caps tweet screaming the same nonsense you spout everyday. Another commenter saw shades of nixon. This is the equivalent of nixon walking through the white house, talking to the portraits. You dont want end to up like me. Reporter what better time to hunt witches than after midnight. No collusion. Reporter the president is making it again, the last time a tweet got this much attention, the president dozed on the keyboard. What is that . Reporter that time he might have had trouble staying awake, mr. President , if youre having
Trouble Sleeping<\/a> ask your doctor if covfefe is right for you. This is a witch hunt like nobody has ever seen before. Before you go, we want to welcome the newest member of the out front family. That beauty is aaron thomas born to our own erin burnett august 20th. He is getting to know his big","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"archive.org","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","width":"800","height":"600","url":"https:\/\/vimarsana.com\/images\/vimarsana-bigimage.jpg"}},"autauthor":{"@type":"Organization"},"author":{"sameAs":"archive.org","name":"archive.org"}}],"coverageEndTime":"20240618T12:35:10+00:00"}