Crook, and as the queen of deception, argued enough credible evidence in the Public Domain to indict, prosecute and convict her of espionage, perjury, misleading congress, public corruption, providing material assistance to terrorist organizations and obstruction of justice. I can point to five times when she lied under oath. I know fbi agents who believe their hands were tied by the Obama Administration and the criminal investigation of her, and i know of american intelligence agents who firmly believe that americans died because clinton failed to keep state secrets secure. She refused to use government secured email devices because she wanted to keep her behavior hidden from the public and the president. Refused to see foreign dignitaries until they gave money to her family foundation. By american and foreign arms dealers, she permitted the sale of arms to groups in libya that were masquerading as antigadhafi militias but according to the cia were terrorist organizations. Yet none of the above was articulated by donald trump in his debate with mrs. Clinton earlier this week. Trump utterly failed to capitalize on her greatest vulnerabilities, the widespread belief she is untrustworthy and her welldocumented record as a failure as secretary of state. Look, president ial debates are not one on points and counterpoints, won on general impressions, the general impression here for mondays debate is that clinton brilliantly controlled the ball and trump came utterly unprepared. She succeeded in arrestinger fall in the polls and in reassuring her democratic base. He failed to give independents and wavering republicans a good reason to back him. She clobbered him. But, both candidates performance deeply disappointed me. Did you hear the word freedom or any of its variants or the constitution mentioned by either debater . I didnt. Neither talked about natural rights, personal liberties coming from our humanity and untouchable by the government. Trump argued for letting police stop you on a whim, and clinton argued for massive increases in wealth transfers. Neither understands the economy, both want the Government Force employers to have higher wages and increase our 19. 5 trillion Government National debt. Neither mentioned the primacy of the individual over the state and neither spoke about the guarantees of liberty in the bill of rights. Regulate any behavior and tax any event. Who really wants to make a choice between two proponents of monster government bigger than it is now . Whatever became of that government which is best which governs least . Answers ahead tonight on kennedy. Who will protect us from a government that takes more than it gives . Or am i wrong about this . To our panel, Julie Roginsky and my fellow new jerseyian dave smith, comedian and host of part of the problem, and brian morganstern, manhattan party, really from new jersey, Manhattan Republican Party vice president. Dave, to you first. Am i wrong or did you see the debate, the two candidates as i did . Judge, you are spoton as always, i recommend everyone read your piece today where you make the argument in more detail. Yeah, this was a competition against two authoritarians to see who could outauthoritarian the other one. There was no talk of individual liberty which is the state, no honest conversation about the tremendous massive growth in the size of government over 15 years and what weve got to show for it. Ryan, why did donald trump look like a High School Jock giving a book report on a book he never read. [laughter] if i could explain why donald trump behaves the way donald trump behaves, i think i would be a billionaire. You are right he missed main points in terms of discrediting hillary. That is supposed to constrain our government, nor did hillary. In fact, she argued we didnt tax enough, and thats what caused the financial crisis. Which is the most nonsensical point of the night that the commentators missed. The point is this. I dont think he felt he needed to prepare and read up and be book smart. He thought im trump, im going to win on personality as he always thinks he can. Julie, i think she succeeded to stop the drop in the polls and reassure the base and rattle the daylights out of him . Heres the difference, i know the woman that prepared her for this debate. She prepared like a monster. The way you all prepare those of you who are lawyers for the bar exam, and probably harder. He thought he could win this because he winged it so many times before. You cannot wing a debate prep. Im talking about the fact you ve to enumerate attacks against you, figure out the proper response, body language, none of the things were things he did, and what concerns me is that he doesnt prepare for a debate in the large scheme of things is important to his campaign but not important to world peace or security. What else is he not going to prepare for hes president. Dave, are you and i out in the cold, should we expect one of them should throw a bone to the small government crowd . We could have been optimistic. Trump had thrown a few bones to libertarians, talking about getting out of nato, it seems like in this debate he moved away from the policies and tried to be more authoritarian. Is he preparing better this time. Do you know from your own sources and Republican Party in new york . I know that there is frustration inside the team and that a number of his coaches and advisers are speaking to him privately to the extent that they can and to the extent that publicly to the extent he wont listen so he gets the message. Were going to move on, donald trump and Hillary Clinton have major problems with certain voter blocs. Polls show Hillary Clinton cant lure in millennials from thirdparty candidates and trumps recent comments about the weight of a former Miss Universe winner from venezuela exposing a major hurtle winning female voters. Who has a bigger hill to climb . Numerically he does because he needs women more than minls, millennials are not coming to her in the way they should. What can she do to get millennials . Send out Bernie Sanders, which shes been doing, sending out obama which is effective for them. What he needs to that show is too old for dave. Dave is over the hill for that. He needs to stop calling women pigs and comparing Rosie Odonnell to a pig. Stop defending miss americas. Can he rid himself of this image as a person unfriendly to women who are not as beautiful as he would like them to appear. Fair question . Fair, and the efforts that hes making, i dont think im prepared to make a judgment on whether it will work or not. But the efforts that he makes are he puts his daughter ivanka out there, he hires a lot of women and promotes them to executive position. He talked about former miss venezuela for three days after the debate. Does the public care why he insulted her 20 years ago . Its a sideshow which is the reason hes been successful in the campaign, because he drowns out everything that is a real. Are you surprised, dave, that the millennials seem to be going to gary johnson from mrs. Clinton and not from donald trump . Yeah, its shocking that young people would not be drawn to corporatist war hawk like Hillary Clinton who doesnt come off like a human being but a pant suit creature of some type. Only understanding of comedians. Shes the most unappealing person. Hillary clinton was the Hillary Clinton at her most appealing and still unappealing. Shes not going to do well with millennials. Its an issue numerically with trump. Gary johnson picked up another major newspaper endorsement. He had another what is aleppo moment . Ill get reaction from the victims Family Member later in the show. When a moment turns romantic, why pause to take a pill . Or stop to find a bathroom . Cialis for daily use is approved to treat both erectile dysfunction and the urinary symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently, day or night. Tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. Do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, or adempas for pulmonary hypertension, as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. Do not drink alcohol in excess. Side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. To avoid longterm injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. If you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or any symptoms of an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. Ask your doctor about cialis and a 200 savings card. Stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. Incr. Think it wouldotection in a pwork, but it does. Dnt. Its called always discreet for bladder leaks, the super. Absorbent core turns liquid to gel. I know im wearing it but no one else will. Always discreet for bladder leaks. Judge napolitano libertarian president ial nominee former new mexico governor gary johnson scoring another major endorsement from the conservative leaning detroit news which chose to snub donald trump, but it comes amid another campaign trail flub for johnson. Whos your favorite foreign leader . Whos my favorite . Just name any one of the continents any, country. One foreign leader you respect, look up to. Anybody. Shimon peres. Im talking about living. Go ahead. [laughter] you got to do this, anywhere, any continent, canada, mexico, europe, asia, south america, a foreign leader you respect. I guess im having an aleppo moment in the former president of mexico. I know, i know. Judge napolitano you recall gary johnson couldnt name aleppo as the epicenter of the syrian civil war. What does this mean for the johnson campaign. The panel is back, Julie Roginsky, dave smith, brian morganstern. You are most likely to vote for gary johnson, does this shake your faith in him . I didnt have a lot of faith in him. Let me try to defend gary johnson. Asking a libertarian to name the leader of a government they like is a difficult question. If you asked me to name a leader of a Foreign Government i dont like, i could rattle off 50 right now. Thats like asking the average american person to name a mob boss you dont like. Judge napolitano Chris Matthews set him up. Is that a setup . The real answer is come on, mr. Trudeau of canada because hes dreamy. Why are we pretending its anybody else. Its canada. Judge napolitano to your expertise as a political consultant does, that help him with the millennials and libertarians . Because they feel as dave said or hurt him because he couldnt come up with a name . Are people voting for gary johnson expecting him to be president or casting a protest vote or in fact a vote to make a statement . And to the extent they think hes going to be leader of the free world it hurts. I dont think thats what theyre expecting, theyre expecting to send a message to the other two about how awful the other two are. Judge napolitano can trump do anything to bring libertarians in . Probably the most libertarian thing ive heard him do if you believe what he says is to keep the right to defend and bear arms. From Bernie Sanders to gary johnson and would go to ron paul or would go to rand paul, might go to ted cruz but are not going to donald trump . I wish it would. The other libertariany thing ive heard him say passing ridiculous laws, is that trump was honest, i dont care where people go to the bathroom, just do what you want, and that was a trigger to think, all right, maybe there is nonauthoritarian common sense there. Judge napolitano the property rights, we started the segment about the detroit news, its 2016, do newspaper endorsements mean what they used to . No, ask the people in New Hampshire who endorsed Chris Christie for president , right . He came in dead last not dead last but third or fourth or fifth. I dont think they do, i dont know anybody who looks at new york times, and l. A. Times or the Washington Post and says now i know which way to vote for president. We all have our minds made up. What is striking is places like the Arizona Republic that never endorse a democrat in their lives endorse Hillary Clinton than donald trump. That says more to me about the fact this is breaking with history than anything else and how people feel about that. Whether an endorsement matters . Not really. Judge napolitano is that a bellwether . Something for trump to worry about that Republican Newspapers are endorsing gary johnson or Hillary Clinton . If you are not putting together the coalition that already existed and building on it, thats a problem. To the extent thats an actual signal of it, that is an issue he needs to consolidate republican support, however, newspapers are going out of print. Judge napolitano the panel returns later to discuss a bill in california allowing felons to vote from jail. Should incarcerated criminals be able to vote. The cia director grilled on capitol hill, darrell issa will join me next. We ship everything you atcan imagine. N, and everything we ship has something in common. Whether its expedited overnight. Or shipped around the globe,. Its handled by od employees who know that delivering freight. Means delivering promises. Od. Helping the world keep promises. Judge napolitano dont call us weasels, that from fbi director james comey in the face of serious accusations he caved into pressure to let Hillary Clinton off the hook in the email scandal. The director yesterday faced a barrage of criticism from lawmakers who also questioned comey on why the bureau gave a form of immunity for a number of clintons underlings, among them California Republican congressman darrell issa, he joins us now. Congressman issa, what did you witness yesterday . Well, obviously the director wanted it to be personalized that somehow people were disparaging the fbi, and nothing could be further from the truth. What we were doing is questioning what seems to be a botched investigation at all levels, whether it was trey gowdy or Jason Chaffetz or chairman goode lat or myself, in the course of an ordinary prosecution and questioned the director, and he had no good answers for most of them. Judge napolitano some of the things that dont happen is no grand jury was impanelled, no subpoena was issued, no search warrants were served. Effectively no supervision from the department of justice. They gave her lawyer a form of immunity when there was nothing to testify about and willynilly gave a form of immunity to the others. Why give immunity . What justification does he have for that when they werent going to give you anything substantial in return against the target, mrs. Clinton . I think, judge, what we can do is assume two things. Ineptness or in fact what they were doing is immunizing people who otherwise could have been squeezed. Theres no question, if you look at somebody and say youve committed crimes, we can prove it. The removal of any government document which cheryl mills clearly had done and they gave her immunity for, that alone would have given ability to convict her of a felony. She would lose her bar license and instead what she got for turning in a laptop voluntarily, she got complete immunity from obstruction and destruction of not things on the laptop but things, period. Judge napolitano do you think that director comey or someone in management at the fbi received instruction, exonerate her, because we know the fbi, and i went through the litany, failed to use ordinary, reasonable, appropriate Law Enforcement tools that are always available to it. They used none of it in this case . I think the appropriate way to look at this is its not for us to question their motives but it is for us to say there but for these mistakes, these clear differences from other investigations including, as you said, no grand jury, no experience, to be candid, no seizing of things can you seize and certainly giving immunity far beyond the scope that would be reasonable for what was being delivered, there but for that we would have had a different outcome, a few individuals held accountable for their crimes and very possibly some of those people would have said hey, i did this at behest of cheryl mills, or at the behest of secretary clinton, that would have changed the basic outcome of the case from we cant prosecute to yes, we have a witness and we will prosecute. Judge napolitano were you surprised at the James Comey Press Conference the day after the 4th of july when he said were not going to prosecute and proceeded to characterize the mountain of evidence of her guilt . You know, when we saw that, and quite frankly, theres a resolution in congress that simply takes those things and has a finding that she failed to meet the minimum requirements for safeguarding classified materials. He obviously found her guilty of the kinds of things that get you fired at the fbi or any other federal agency, and i think your viewers know getting fired from the federal government is not easy. She did things that would get you fired and keep you from working for the federal government, but he reached this odd conclusion, not a normal Law Enforcement conclusion but this conclusion he could never prosecute and hes standing by it. Judge napolitano does the committee have the impression they were not hearing everything they wanted to hear . That theres some missing piece to the puzzle. Somebody big footed something and jim comey couldnt turn the person in . What we feel is justice was not done here, no one was held accountable for the egregious errors and they continue. One of the things i was able to expose along with others is one of the individuals who got immunity was, in fact taking evidence offline at reddit in the last week. You know, the director didnt seem surprised and wouldnt seem to commit whether or not that was a crime to remove things that the public now no longer can see, and these are the reddit posts that ask about how do you scrub, and expressions like they asked me to do that, without hi