There is not illegal about it. It is not part of this case. The prosecution wants to bring this in to say well, he and trump had some kind of agreement that he would help him out with the election. Harris i want to bring in Andrew Cherkasky and andrew, we now have learned that the prosecution has finished with its opening arguments and now the defense is giving its opening arguments. We have producers in the courtroom so were getting realtime whats going on in there. What are your thoughts on this case . It sounds like the opening from the prosecution was focused on the idea that Donald Trump lied over and over and over again referring to the entries in the new York Business records saying that the payments were legal retainers. The problem with the prosecution here is that seems to be a perfectly reasonable and rational entry into the books there. It is not as though Donald Trump put in there donation to child
vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.