Transcripts For FOXNEWSW On The Record With Greta Van Suster

FOXNEWSW On The Record With Greta Van Susteren May 12, 2014 23:00:00

Saturday night live. Thanks for inviting us into your home tonight. Thats it for this special report, fair, balanced and unafraid. Greta goes on the record right now. Im greta van susteren. This is on the record. We have not yet extinguished mans darkest impulses. Is this the p. C. Presidency . Islam is providing a disproportionate share of radical nut bags killing people right now. The president s comments on nigerian terrorists landing him in hot water, even from the left. There is no mention here of connecting this to the religion. Bill maher on the attack. Liberals do not stand up for liberalism. Liberalism means one, mostly equality of women, free speech. No death threats. On the record investigates tonight and. What science tells bus the after life there is none. When you die you are dead. Atheists chaplains in the military how did that work . Its just total nonsense, the idea of having a chaplain who is an atheist. I have got 99 problems with [bleep] he has got 99 problems and this is one. Beyonces sister brutally attacking rapper jayz. Also, fired. A teacher breaks up this fight with a broom and now she is out of a job. And she is right here to go on the record tonight. Up first is, there Political Correctness and is the Obama Administration tiptoeing around not wanting to offend radical islam. Boko haram is a dangerous islamic group. The group has murdered more than 0,000 people and three weeks ago kidnapped 300 girls in my gearia, still have them. They are responsible for other horrific crimes. Why wont the white house just call out radical islam. The president s Political Correctness turk off some of his biggest supporters. There is no connecting this to the religion which is what im always seeking to do because i think thats the elephant in the room and in the religion at large, women are seen as property. Islam as one of the great major religions is providing disproportionate share of radical nut bags killing people right now. Lets look at how long we have had people running around making excuses to hurt other people. And islam is a part of that tradition but so has christianity has been. Slavery. This is the 14th century, i would be coming down on the christians because thats when they were too violent. Or the atheists. At this point religions and cultures change and the 14th century it was the christians but this isnt the 14th century. The vast majority of muslims terrorists it, does seem that the vast majority of terrorist incidents do involve some aspect of the muslim world. You dont see a whole lot of buddhist suicide bombers. Im still waiting for the koreans to show up. All the religions are the problem but especially this one. Former ambassador john bolton. Good evening. Good evening. Are we being too soft on radical islam in terms of how we speak about them . Are we too afraid or gentle or politically incorrect . The administration and large parts of the American Academic establishment are afraid to discuss radical islam and islamic terrorism because they operate under the mistaken view that if you use those words or talk about that threat that somehow youre insulting all of islam. I think thats wrong in several respects. Number one, there is no such thing as the islamic world. It makes no more sense to talk about that than it does to talk about the christian world. People have different views and they have different experiences. And thats fundamentally whats wrong with this Political Correctness and with bill mahers view of it, too. They are all wrong. They are all talking about identity politics. Have you got your women and you have got your muslims and you have got your africanamericans and those groups all think alike. Thats fundamentally flawed. All right. Well, the Group Boko Haram is seeking to establish a pure Islamic State and they want it ruled by sharia law. Very punitive to women. Extremely punitive to women. They attack christians, bomb churches, kidnappings. Language about them people are just beginning to call them evil terrorists but they are not alone. No, this is part of the growing threat of terrorism and radical islam all across northern africa. Why werent they designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization some years ago . In part, i think from the Administration Spokesman they didnt want to say that a terrorist group in the largest country in africa. One out of four africans is a nigerian was growing and becoming increasing threat because that would cut across the administrations political native that terrorism narrative that terrorism is no longer a war. Brandizing university where they had selected a woman to be the Commencement Speaker who grew up in somalia and she made very harsh from personal experience, very harsh comments about radical islam and suddenly she was booted. She actually is the Worst Nightmare for those who practice identity politics. Because she reasoned through that she couldnt be a muslim under any circumstances so she became an atheist. So she is a black female atheist conservative and that makes peoples heads explode on the left that is the trouble with identity politics. You are not talking about the merits of the issue. Radical islam or terrorism. You are talking about whose identity trumps whose others identity. That is fundamentally disliewcial. What is the danger of being politically correct or whatever we call it we all say right things. Publicly maybe in private we are saying very different things. Whats the harm to being politically correct . Well, i think being a tolerant person is a good thing. That is a virtue. But when you insist on as they say in the left, contextualizing the base so being a woman trumps being a man or being white trumps being black or whatever it is, it do attaches from you reality and makes it impossible to address pending threats like the threat of boko haram kidnapping innocent girls for the sin of being educated. And, of course, thats just the tip of the iceberg with them. Right. Thank you. Thank you. Atheist group is demanding an atheist chaplain in the military. The group claims as more atheists join the military they need somewhere to go for support. The department of defense is considering the change. Is the d. O. D. Being politically correct . Joining us my colleague sean hannity. Good evening, sean. Good evening how are you. What do you think about this . Im reading a story the group is preparing the military foorn atheist chaplain. You know, what i find about the left, this becomes political for me is that there is this intolerance towards people that have a faith that have religions and so we need equal time. We need fairness. Im thinking we have got Better Things to do with our military than to appease those people that have special unique political agendas because they sore offended that you that chaplain available for men and women throughout fighting for their country in uniform and faith is very important to them. They make a mockery out of it i think its high time we stand up and say enough. Its almost like this whole campaign against boko haram, terrorists dont read twitter terrorists think it is ridiculous. It dovetails to me. What im so curious, if they claimed thasm was was a regioneye im not sure what an thas would do different than a courtroom. They dont agree with a higher being so there are psychologists available for those in the military, not faithrelated and if they have those issues, they should be able to that should suffice for them if they needed any help or assistance. Look, to me, this is a sort of an in your face, slap in the face to those people of faith. And they are trying to kind of advance a political agenda within the military and obviously military discipline should transcend all of this. If you have got an ageneral darks the military is not the place to push it through. I think thats the primary issue. We are very respe everybodys beliefs, lack thereof. Or whatever. The military really have a different beast. Primary to everything is that we have to make sure that we have enormous discipline. Not that we should exclude people. Rather than fighting over certain other issues and sort of, you know, making problems that we dont necessarily need. We need discipline. You are spurring a thought here and i know you are covering tonight the boko haram issue too. My first comment is that, you know, you have got this bring back our girls, terrorists dont read twitter. And there is an uncall do you uncall could youableness. I think thats a lot of noise bring back our girls. Noise is what we run on here. We Start Talking about it. The white house pays attention and capitol hill. I may be one of the few but i think its a effective way to create noise and buzz so people will Pay Attention to it. You might be right on your point. You have to think how do our enemies view this . And im thinking if they do hear about it, they dont care in the least. Not in the least . They are the ones that matter. For example, if we really cared about sharia law, and its treatment of women, and, you know, for example, women cant drive. Women cant be seen in public in saudi arabia without somebody that they are married to. They have the morality police. Women are stoned to death in some countries. Gays and lesbians are stoned to death. There are horrible treatment of women. They need four male eyewitnesses for rape. If we really cared about that then maybe we would identify certain incidents for what they are. And that would mean the president could have, instead of apologizing in cairo for america could have spoken out against radical islam. We could have called fort hood not work place violence but an act of terror. We could stop using ridiculous euphemisms. Dont get me started on sharia law. Sean, thank you for joining us. See you at 10 00. Im watching you at 7 00. I will continue to watch. Good. Harvard university where satanic black mass is happening in just minutes. Rocking harvard. The archdiocese of boston and catholics around the global. The event was scheduled to be on campus, a few hours ago the Harvard Group moved the black mass off harvards campus to undisclosed location. Harvard student aurora joins us. She is the former president of Harvard Catholic students. Thank you for joining us. Of course, happy to be here, greta. Now, apparently you have got this sort of moving black mass. Do you have any idea where this mass is tonight . According to the latest crimson reports im aware of, the negotiations did fall through from that nightclub in central square. So were hoping that the whole thing just gets cancelled. The worst Case Scenario would that be they try to get it back on campus. You have had any chance to talk to the president of the university or anybody in the hierarchy on campus . Well, in fact, i had submitted a letter to president drew fouts this morning. With the nearly 60,000 names of people who objected to this hateful event. I have not received a personal response from president faust. Her public response has been that she is personally dismayed that any Cultural Group would undertake something so offensive. But i have not heard from her further. Each going to talk abouting it. How do you reconcile this with the First Amendment . Sure. Well, greta, i dont think this is an issue of free speech. We are talking about a private institution which has defined its free speech as being limited by anything that dishonors another persons religion. It says that that is contrary to the balance of rights that the university promotes. And so i think according to the universitys own definition, this is not something that is acceptable interesting how the hierarchy university didnt toss them off campus. They chose. If you go i nine miles downtown road at brandeis, they threw out their Commencement Speaker saying antagonistic things to radical islam. Nine miles down the road and you have got these two important universities with very different views on in this. Thats right. Greta there are a number of inconsistent messages being sent by harvard in this situation. But i think its important that we respond to whats actually happening on our campus. We only have 30 seconds left. Where do you think they are going . Are they going undercover or underground . Its interesting. We have been chasing them for the last 90 minutes we have had reporters up there. Hopefully, they are going away. Thats where they are going. But we will, i guess we will have to see. I will see when i get back on campus soon. I myself will be at the holy hour at saint pauls. Well, thank you. Well be watching to see whats going on tonight. Thanks for having me on, greta. Thank you. Okay. Lets all go offtherecord for just a second. In just moments, Near Harvard University some meanspirited students will be exercising First Amendment right by insulting catholics, not just at harvard but around the globe. About to start a satanic mass which they know is deeply offensive to catholics. Justification . To put the spotlight on the First Amendment. What do i think . Frankly i think they are awful. Plus they are cowferred. They know when you offend the catholics this way the catholic also pray for them. Thats pretty safe. The catholics would never dare put the spotlight on the First Amendment if thats what they want to do by burning the koran. They wouldnt get prayers but Something Else in return. A big Something Else. Im certainly not suggesting to burn the koran. Get that straight. Just making an example. Calling out this group. Frauds, cowards. Not First Amendment advocates. First amendment also includes the freedom of religion. People advocate for the First Amendment and want to celebrate it would not use just one clause of the amendment to stifle or intimidate another part of that same amendment. Just because you have a First Amendment right to do something remember, that doesnt mean you should. In some instances it even means you might be mean and rotten and this might be and this is one of those. Thats my offtherecord comment tonight. Right now, former treasury secretary tim geithner firing shots from everyone from the white house to the claims the white house told him to mislead the American People on the sunday morning shows by falsely saying that Social Security does not contribute to the deficit. Joining us our political panel, Washington Examiner Susan Ferrechio of the the Washington Post jacqueline kucinich and josh mccormick. This has set people on fire today. Waking up to tim geithner but then there has been dialback. Yeah. An administration lying to the American People should always be shocking. But this isnt really too surprising. Is this a lie . I think it counts as a lie that they know it wasnt contributing to the deficit. Geithner couch it and caveat it. The administration is continually down played the entitlement crisis in america. A little more than a decade. Spending on medicare, medicaid, Social Security, and interest will take up every single penny that were taking n tax dollars. The administration has tillablely down played that fact. Not offered really any Real Solutions and demagogued republicans like the House Republicans in 2011 with paul ryans plan to reform medicare. Take away your grandmothers healthcare. This isnt too surprising given the track record. Jackie, good for secretary geithner at least how he reports it, he stood up to pressure to the white house to make what is now being said a mispleading statement. Interesting side part of this is that he also said something about an Economic Advisor on the Romney Campaign and that Economic Advisor is saying that geithners line about what he said. There is a lot of line pointing going on tonight. These memoirs across the board are a way for these Administration Officials to shape history. Its their version of events. We have had quite a few of them. We have had gates, we have Hillary Clintons coming out. When you have memoirs you have disagreement. One persons point of view. You know, these days it seems if we wait long enough, the other person will have a memoir so maybe we have more than 360degree view of how things actually happened. Is this confusion of bad memory or is this deceitful . I mean, if they were trying to get geithner to go out and say this on the morning shows. Well all know they have a Bad Reputation with sending people on morning shows right now at least as far as susan rice, is this deceitful or just confusion and the stakes . And memories . There is always a he said, she said. But, if you look at i see it as part of a pattern. If you look at the talk show he transcripts. Geithner appeared oon a they talk about Social Security. On abc, he is asked specifically whether there are going to be cuts to Social Security. He kind of talks around it. He doesnt say. No i dont think he gives the answer the administration wants but you can hear him trying to couch it in a way to show that its not going to be part of the fiscal cliff. I hate that have the couric to say what you think, right . Then i say lets connect this to benghazi which everyone might think is crazy. Well, i have always wondered why Hillary Clinton wasnt the one who appeared on the talk sho

© 2025 Vimarsana