Just seconds after the prosecutor announce nod indictment. Riots breaking out, protesters setting fires, looting stores, turning cars upside down. Smashing glass and blocking roads. And much more. Meanwhile, police in Armored Vehicles firing back with tear gas. So, tonight, missouris Governor Nixon ordering hundreds more National Guardsmen to the streets of ferguson. We are getting new information about the evidence to that grand jury. You are about to hear from our team of legal and Forensic Experts but we start with Griff Jenkins live on the ground in Ferguson Griff . Hi, greta. Thats right. Things have changed and can you see it right over my shoulder. That is the National Guard taking a full force position here at the Police Department in ferguson again 61 arrests, 21 fires. At least one person investigated as a homicide. It was chaos here. There were were bullets being fired hour by hour. The fires just up and down this street it was something i have never seen in the streets of america. Take a look. Shouting. It was the night parts of ferguson missouri burned to the ground. Arson, gunshots, looting. All and all out chaos in the middle of america. And on the record for it all. Out of my face now. Go. Shoe, shoe, shoo. For hours. The city of ferguson has absolutely gone to shambles. Shocking pictures making this Missouri Town look like a war zone. Tear gas, gunshots, molotov cocktails sending shock waives throughout the community. Live fox News Coverage catching some of the most chaotic coverage. By the way early we reported one of our reporters said it was tear gas but it was one. Here we go. And now the ferguson meat market and liquor being hit. One fox News Reporter attacked during a live report. What about all the people that have these masks on like that guy. How many people are covering themselves. The only casualty was the camera. Right now i have two iphones working to show you a Beauty Supply shop which has just been set on fire. It was a night of total anarchy. Thats real gunfire. Greta, as we are here thcialtion is where it all began last night. We heard the announcement and chaos ensued. Only one protester standing in front of the National Guard. The crowds are not swelling. However as police and authorities said in a press conference. They are worried that the law of averages will catch up to them. They cannot keep sustaining without terrible things like loss of life. We will hope its a calmer night here in ferguson with the National Guard its going to be a different scene. Greta . Are people saying anything to you on the street, griff, to indicate that they are looking for calm tonight or do you get sort of the sense that things are going to rev up soon . Thats a great question, greta. Let me tell you what people here are saying and they are all saying the exact same thing. They are saying they are glad to finally see the National Guard. The Business Owners who are hurt the most. This is their economic livelihood. Small Business Owners up and down these streets. They said where were they last night . Why didnt they protect us . They are glad to see them tonight and they hope for the best. We have a little bit more on that in just a little bit. Greta . But i dont get i get the sense by looking at it though and well hear more from the officer in a second i should tell the viewers. I get a sense that things have sort of returned more to normal. I dont get that panicked feeling. Of course im looking at it through a monitor. I dont know what its like there. Well, you know, there is perhaps not a sense of normalcy. There is less panic because everyone was in anticipation of that decision to come down from the grand jury which they have been waiting for for three months. There is a sense of concern. People dont know whats going to come. Last night we saw people that were hell bent on violence and setting fires. There were peaceful protest hers but there was a different element. That element could be laying low and waiting to come out tonight. If you look across the street, greta, one thing we did not see last night earnings thats been talked about a little bit. Is the clergy. We see at least two members of the clergy across the street. Thats the Community Leaders that we wanted or the folks here wanted to see out trying to calm people down. But, again, its all going to be whether that bad element comes out tonight and only time will tell. Greta . Griff, thank you. We will check back with you a little later. Tonight, officer Darren Wilson speaking to abc news George Stephanopoulos. He describes the moments up to when he first pulled that trigger. I reached out my window of my right hand to grab his forearm i was going to try to move him back. I felt the immense power that he h the way i have described it. It was like a 5yearold holding on to hulk hogan. He was very large. Very powerful man. You are a pretty big guy. Yeah. Im above average. You try to grab him but you feel that force . Yes. And then as im holding him i see him coming back around with his left hand. Its in the shape like this and it comes through the window and just a solid punch to the right side of my face. You are still sitting thering out. The next thing is how do i survive. How do i survive . I didnt know if i would be able to withstand another hit like that. Where is your gun. On my right hip. I come up and point it at him. Get back or im going to shoot you. His response immediately he grabbed the top of my gun. When he grabbed it he said you are too much of a [bleep] totoshoot me. While is he is doing that can i feel his hand trying to come over my hand and get inside the trigger guard and try to shoot me with my own gun. And thats when i pulled the trigger for the first time. If there. Officer wilson also says Michael Brown never put his hands up as some witnesses described. And you will hear more of officer wilsons interview a little later in our hour. We are getting more information about the evidence presented to the grand jury it includes hours of testimony, including officer Darren Wilson himself. Also today it prosecutors releasing photos, showing bruises on officer wilsons face, down the back of his head. Those photos though are generating much controversy. Some of the injuries are insignificant. And there is more. According to the grand jury transcripts, officer wilson told the grand jury that he felt he needed to pull the trigger because he feared for his levee. He testified, quote i felt that under another one of those punches in my face could knock me out or worse, i mean it was he is obviously bigger than i was and stronger. I had already taken to two to the face. I didnt think i would. The third one could be fatal if he hit me right. And joining us, our legal panel. Defense lawyer ted williams live in ferguson and former prosecutor katie fang in miami. When you listen to those sound bites with George Stephanopoulos to the officer. Any thoughts . Well, i think that its consistent with what the testimony was that he provided to the grand jury. He testified that he was in reasonable fear for his safety and for his life when he was attacked by Michael Brown. Now, if you think about it, he has now had the opportunity to speak to the grand jury and now he is speaking america, trying to tell his side of the story. Whats interesting is he does admit that he attempted to get rounds off. That he pulled the trigger, and that sometime some of the rounds did not come off. In the end he ended up striking Michael Brown. Whats absolutely fantastic in terms of corroborating his story is the fact that there are independent eyewitnesses that states that Michael Brown charged at officer wilson when they were outside of the police car. And so at the end of the day you have consistent corroborating stories between officer wilson and some independent eyewitnesses. And, ted, let me go to you. Raised important point. I have actually got the grand jury testimony right here. And we dont have the name of one of the witnesses, but, witness number 10 thats the one that tends to corroborate that says he was an eyewitness, that he was there. He says and then mr. Brown continued, started again to charge towards him. Now, thats the transcript thats been released by the prosecutors office. That tends to i mean, that tentsdz to tends to corroborate. Of course the officer is going to Say Something thats expull pa tore to himself but the corroboration is what we look for. Judge van susteren allow me the defense attorney to play the role of a defense attorney here. The first question is, was what officer wilson said subjectively reasonable . I submit several things here. Before officer wilson even went into that grand jury, i believe he was well programmed because he was lawyered up and he went into that grand jury thats the first thing. The second thing he talks about the blows at the car. Guess what . Look at the physical characteristics of officer wilson and its inconsistent with those blows. The third thing officer wilson says that Michael Brown was running away from him and that he was 10 feet away when he pulled the trigger. We know thats inconsistent. That he was about 150 feet away i submit to you, judge van us is is strengthen there are inconsistencies. Lets talk about the distance thing. I thought that the body was found 153 feet from the car which didnt necessarily mean we dont know where the officer was. So officer could be two inches from him. I mean, the body is found 153 feet from the car. But i thought the officer did pursue him and so i would expect the officer would be 153 and the decedents body. Think about this. He had a semiautomatic weapon. Every tame he fired that weapon, it ejected a shell. So, they would be able to show approximately how far away he was by the ejection of those shells, greta, thats significant and important if i was a defense attorney in the case. All right. I mean, i dont think the 153, thats not what i you know, i think the 153 from the car one of the other things interesting is the blood spatter. What the decedent was doing at the it point he was getting shot. That might have been somewhat corroborative for the officer. I dont know. Yeah. Absolutely. We know that the officer testified that he had a. 40 caliber six hour that held 13 rounds. He said he fired off 12. We know there was actual rounds that struck mr. Browns body. You look at the blood spatter and location of the wound, and we also know that the wounds themselves, the entry of the gunshot, the exit wounds are they consistent with charging or surrendering with hands up. Forensic evidence that corroborates officer wilsons story. Ted and katie, thank you both. But we also. Go ahead, ted. No. No thats all right. I will give you a shot. Come on. Tell me what you were going to say . Quickly, we also have witnesses who are saying that he had his hands up. There is inconsistent testimony that is inherently unreliable. Ted and indicatey, thank you both. We will check back with you both a little later. Next guest played Important Role in this forensic pathologist dr. Michael baden he performed autopsy at the familys request and testified in front of the grand jury. Dr. Bae den joins us. Good evening, sir. Good evening, greta. In looking at the decedents body and the autopsy you conducted and the fact that you didnt look at the first one. Were the wounds consistent with what this officer said in the grand jury or inconsistent with . Well, the medical examiner who did the autopsy testified, im beginning to read over some of the testimonies now, and in his testimony he said that the gun was 6 to 9 inches away from the hand when he was shot in the hand. All right. Thats inside the car. Couldnt have been on the car. In the car. Now they are both out of the car, the desee dent is blocking away and the Police Officer is in some pursuit. Right. Now all the other gunshot wounds are a distance away beyond three feet that we cant tell the difference between 2 and 3 feet and 30 feet from an autopsy. We can tell if somebody is coming towards you or away from you. Thats where the credibility of the witnesses are. And as your guests have said, there are witnesses that give credibility to either side and the problem with the grand jury is there isnt an attorney there to crossexamine witnesses. So that each witness tell the story, and nobody, you know, cross crossexamines the officer when he testified. But there are some wounds that are obvious. For instance, if he were shot in the bed which he was not. That would be a strong indication one direction or not. He was not shot in the back. Thats right. Also the path of the bullet can sometimes be indicative. For instance if its upward path, the shooter may have been on the ground or something. Is there anything about the path to the directions of the bullets themselves that indicate to corroborate or to do just the opposite take away from the officers explanation . Yeah. There are four wounds in the right upper exextremity one in the palm and three in the forearm and upper arm. One in the forearm is from behind. The two in the arm are consistent with coming from the front. We cant tell exactly where they occur. They didnt bleed very much. The wound that was bleeding the most was blood drop was the hand. Three of the Bullet Wounds, the last three of the Bullet Wounds occurred in a cluster hitting him in the top of the head, the face, and the chest all consistent with his indicative of his head being face down parallel to the ground at the time the top of his head was struck and the face the upper chest. They and according to some witnesses, there were two bursts. There were first gunshot wounds and then a burst of three or four at the end. And thats when he falls to the ground. Face first, unconscious and gets bruising over the right side of his face. Okay. Those last three of those cluster. The top of the head, the fates, and the chest. That would seem to me to have one of two explanations. One that helps the officer and one that doesnt. One is that the decedent was already falling as a consequence of being injured. The other is that he is downward lunging toward the Police Officer, which is i guess one eyewitness, witness number 10 said charging. Can you look at those wounds, was it someone falling who was getting shot those three times or someone charging . Is there any way to know. No. That as you say it could be either one. Falling or giving up and pending his head down or falling or charging. We cant tell from the autopsy. That depends on the credibility of the witnesses and who the grand jurors fell feel are more reliable. Whats so interesting about the grand jury is the stoornd so light not yard like in a petit jury. The grand jurors couldnt even meet the lighter version evaning will at all the evidence. We dont know in the grand jury they theeted to indict. There could have been 8 to 4 for indictment or 6 to6 or 12 for not indictment. The fact that there was no doesnt mean that the majority of the jurors didnt believe the witnesses didnt believe the officer. Dr. Bae den, thank baden, thank you, sir. Thank you, greta. Protesters taking to the streets. Many outraged by the grand jurys decision. The evidence that may have helped the panel make its decision. As live breaking News Coverage continues. You will hear more from darryl wilsons first interview. Hang on to your seat. You might be a bulls eye. Holiday weather threaten to cancel breaking news right now. Protests across the country in the wake of the ferguson grand jury. There are conflicting accounts where mike brown was and what he was doing at the point Darren Wilson fired the fatal shot. Dr. Vincent demaio joins us, good evening, sir. Good evening, greta. What draws your attention, sir, mostly to this autopsy. Anything stick out in your mind . There are three things. One, mr. Brown had his hand around the gun at the time of discharge. This talk about 6 inches is nonsense. The range probably was from either an angled contact with the muzzle to at most a half inch. Beyond the half inch, the powder grains coming out the muzzle of gun separate and embedded in the palm of the hand. This was not described. The palm of the hand was seen by three different teams of medical examiners. So, were fairly sure that the range was contact to quarter of an inch. Second thing is the officer said that mr. Brown was facing him and punched him with his left hand. Because he was facing him and punched him with the left hand, the blow would have gone to the right cheek and photographs of the right side of the face show the face swollen and red at the hospital. The third thing is mr. Brown was advancing on the officer at the time the officer fired the fatal shot. At the time of the fatal shot, he fell to the ground. But there was a trail of blood going away from him so we know he advanced past the point where he was fatally shot leaving a trail of blood. Then turned around and went back towards the officer at which time he received the fatal shot and went to the ground. So he had to be advancing. As to the holding the hands and the im sorry, go ahead. I was going to say, i actually find that third point to be the most significant. I see this in two incidents. You have the first instance in the car which seems like a selfdefense. Its a struggle over a gun. That seems pretty solid selfdefense. Its the second incident, which is when the officer gets out and Michael Brown, the decedent is moving away. The question is this Excessive Force or is he in fear of his life . Your description of the blood, it shows that Michael Brown was returning towards him. And so that would be morph of an aggressor. That would be an aggressors move of Michael Brown