It is a serious, tense situation at the white house tonight and got an announcement from the u. S. Pacific command in hawaii taking the lead on this and think there was no threat to north america or guam and its important to note but say they are monitoring this closely. As reported, this flew over japan, our key ally in the region with President Trump also briefed on the situation by his chief of staff, general john kelly and monitoring this is defense secretary james mattis and recently warned north korea that they would be annihilated if they used there were plans and as it was launched, mattis and the head and u. S. Nuclear forces were talking with reporters with the interview ending abruptly packing staff, it did something happen . The north korean dictator kim jong un launched an intermediate range Ballistic Missile eastward from north korea and flew over the territory of northern japan before landing in the Pacific Ocean and the flight distance is key, 2300 miles, its significant because that means guam is now at in north koreas range with a missile like this and also an inyourface move coming days after the u. S. Rallied the Un Security Council to pass tough new sanctions against north korea led by Ambassador Nikki Haley and the president warned even tougher sanctions might be coming. Next tuesday at the president , himself, will be at the un delivering his firstever speech to the General Assembly in new york where north korea will be front and center and the u. S. Pacific command is claiming our defense of japan and south korea is ironclad in the u. S. Is ready to defend ourselves and our allies from any attack were provocation. That is from the u. S. Military tonight watching all of that very closely. Now for our top story, President Trump causing controversy by saying he is working on a deal with democrats that enhances Border Security and allows dreamers, Illegal Immigrants brought to the u. S. As children to stay in the country. They are upset it does not include funding for the border wall but mr. Trump said it will, eventually, the belt. Very important if the wall to me and will not be obstructed and without it, i would not do anything. We are looking for extreme Border Security and surveillance and Everything Else and has to get the wall. It does not have to be here but have to construct the wall. Without citizenship, we are looking at allowing people to stay here and working with everybody. Republicans. We are working with tim accredits and just spoke with paul ryan. Senate majority leader, a democrat does not have any of said that the for those upset about the wall funding. I listened to a fox news this morning, im starting to do that and they keep saying the president promised a wall in the campaign. Yeah, he also promised mexico would pay for it. They said 12 times they are not paying for it and is not the promise he made. We have been hearing about this and talking about it and one thing President Trump said that they could not obstruct something that might be somewhere else, not in of the daca bill but in a budget and the house has passed border funding and is in the Budget Proposal as we speak and maybe that is what President Trump is saying to get the daca deal done and the wall. It was a heavy signal. I thought so. I think that is what he is trying to do and trying to be a clever negotiator and businessman sitting down with them because i need a Little Something from the left and from the democrats and is something important to them and will add value and then all me and Reach Across Party Lines like we have talk about to get the support and has very thin support to get over the hurdle, legislatively, like we have seen as it relates to healthcare, immigration, you mentioned earlier is the one thing he is able to jump across and get to the other side and on the flipside, hardcore supporters with broad base republicans are not happy with and think this is a sidestep away with abandoning the principles they campaigned on and tied the wall in. Listen to me, i will take care of the wall and still intend to do it and dont get distracted by the machinations of schumer ouppercaseletter see and have a clever way to get it in elsewhere. That is a possibility. I was looking at twitter and watching people burning their hats and you have to relax. This is a young relationship and sometimes newlyweds get in a big fight but is too soon and nothing bad has happened yet. There is funded but not for the wall. You dont know that, it could go to the wall. Think about what daca is, no way he was going to send them back and instead of writing it off something he used as a trade and traded away something that he really didnt have too trade and was a nice little trick and kind of like when a kid, for his birthday takes his dad to the store and once these 200 pair of shoes and points at the 1200 bike. How about the shoes and the dad says something a smart kid dies. He still has to make a deal and if cards migration and gets verified and build a wall or something of a wall, a pretty good deal. The bigger thing is and what he did, building the wall created a shift in the conversation and we were talking about on the five for five years, he forced the media to confront an entire population unhappy about the border. That is what he did. It also helped him win, build the wall with enhanced Border Protection with the three legs of that cable, the table of law and order was immigration, police and national security. That is what got him in. In the big pitcher, it got him a win and created a shift in the conversation. Combination of these things with Border Security and do things when he said i am going to build a wall, he described it and how it would lock. Mexico will pay for it to end the big rallying cry and know why people would be upset even though they will still probably support him. A lot of the base will be displeased and the centerpiece of his campaign. The war was a metaphor if you cannot get that done and you are a builder and that is your major policy initiatives, what have you got to run on. The daca deal. It is not amnesty. Not building a pathway to citizenship people will have a hard time stomach king that. I support daca, but if they cut in line delivered amnesty i will have a hard time dealing with that. I think what nancy and crying chuck it did is based on the dinner and put the president on the defensive. You always are the first to define your meeting. Get out of the meeting and go to the microphones. We had a deal on daca and the border wall funding is off the table. There is no deal and we will fund the wall later. And understand what the president is doing by not linking it to daca. No democrat will vote to fund the wall became a. Only there and will be hard. If you are a democrat and vote to fund the wall, your vote primaries you and voting to fund the racist border wall, you are done and there is no chance coming with a bill and quit hanging debt ceiling. Christmas eve is the only way it is happening. What do you think from the democrat perspective . They got a good deal working with the president and wants to work with them and dont know if you saw this, the Chuck Schumer is on the floor talking and get picked up on a high speed one. You have to take a step left and a step right, otherwise you get boxed in says schumer. I dont give much credence to the idea of the wall from anyones budget and dont think that will happen, at the moment. What i give credence it is the idea that steve king says this will blow up trumps base and who does not want trump impeached at all. He is not living up to the promise that he at ticket related. What interests me is the actual legislation with democrats proposing a vote boat on the dream act. Republicans have something called recognizing americas children. What is the big difference . The difference is the dream act will give you a conditional residency, which is a pathway to citizenship. With the republican plan you have to apply for that residency but is still a pathway to citizenship and can imagine steve bannon at breitbart thing this is amnesty if they met the president says we have not talk about amnesty and hearing that is troubling. It is troubling but was surprised to see that mark meadows head of the freedom caucus, we do not have to vote on a wall and was not heavily invested and note and senator mcconnell, paul ryan not vested and do not even want to vote on this thing. What would you have said on the campaign instead of building a wall . What would have been more of a promise by. Strong borders. Everybody said strong borders and the reason he won is he did not say strong borders or enhanced Border Security. He said build a wall. That could mean all of those things that said it that way because it resonated. To you think that is what he really meant . Actual, physical construction of a wall. They have called it in contractors to give a play on. M. Ed. , i think he is. You are saying he did not mean that quite. You are saying he promised you are saying he promised trust 1 doctor recommended dulcolax. Use dulcolax tablets for gentle dependable relief. Suppositories for relief in minutes. And dulcoease for comfortable relief of hard stools. Dulcolax. Designed for dependable relief. Youre searching for something. Whoooo. Like the perfect deal. On the perfect hotel. So wouldnt it be perfect if. There was a single site. Where you could find the. Right hotel for you at the best price . There is. Because tripadvisor now compares. Prices from over 200 booking. Sites. To save you up to 30 . On the hotel you want. Trust this birds words. Tripadvisor. The latest reviews. The lowest prices. When only the best will do. One of a kind tempurpedic delivers. Only tempur material precisely conforms to your weight, shape and temperature. It provides up to twice as much pressure relieving power, so you wont toss and turn. And tempurpedic is the best at minimizing motion transfer from your partner. Youll wake up, feeling like a champion. Savings end soon through september 17th, save up to 500 on select adjustable sets. Find your exclusive retailer at tempurpedic. Com President Trumps daughter, ivanka is a senior white house adviser and a role model for many women but when Hillary Clinton was asked about ivanka on her book tour she said the president and only the president was responsible for his actions and went to rant about neonazis and President Trump ending daca before seeing this. Everyone associated with him are either on board with that or they are not. If they are not, they need to be speaking out or leaving. If they remind silent and just give lip service to contrary points of view, then, they are part of his agenda and should be judged and held accountable for that. That sounded really weird, which trial, executioner. Interesting for someone who has so vigorously protected her daughter, Chelsea Clinton from attacks regarding politics or personal situations with their family that she would not give some sort of the way for someone like ivanka trump who loves her father and said i might not always agree with him at a monitor his team and honored to be in the white house. She is trying to do it a lot of work for women. This was disingenuous on behalf of Hillary Clinton and in the moment because it is a popular thing to say you are against ivanka trump and gave an interview today with the Financial Times you had to get a subscription and is annoying but i could read the whole article in his forthcoming about how she wants to be a Public Servant and is not something she sought but wants to participate and support her father. We should appreciate that. It is hypocritical, because she holds a different standard for chelsea. Is Chelsea Clinton responsible for bill clintons dalliances in the oval office . Was she responsible for him having sex with an intern in the oval office clocks that is a good followup that they did not ask that. You cannot totally blame hillary and dont know if she would have said that if the question had been asked with the reporter extremely biased and posed the question as if President Trump is a criminal. How can you be okay with him . She was saying it and coming from a really deep, deep place of bias. I would blame this journalist, who ever this person is more than hillary. And the blame tour continues. From the blame game to the shame game, dividing Polite Society from resident trump and try to do this when the president will Say Something controversial or do Something Like the muslim ban or access hollywood locker room talk and what the media and the left will do to make sure all republicans denounce the president or resign and usually works with week kneed republicans. Democrats do not have shame and i think juan can agree with that. Hillary has not shown a lot ofs recently. For a woman who prides herself as a progressive states woman and above it all and a uniter, former first lady, think about what she has done. She did not give a concession speech on Election Night and has not handled this loss with any grace and has tried to undermine the president at every turn. Her entire book is about settling scores and attacking the first daughter. She distilled the silverware from the white house, you have to expect this from her. How about someone who ran for president , the first woman and, instead, going about attacking another woman who is trying to serve her country and is passionate about a lot of the same issues that hillary claims to be passionate about, equal pay for women and single moms and better education for Young Children in child care. This is someone she is trying to lift up and is a bad move for her. It is not a bad move at all and what is interesting for me is there are a lot of people in new york society, who know the trumps who say that ivanka will counterbalance her father. She is for the things that kimberly just laid out and was going to mollify at some of his harsher hard right stances. Those people are disappointed not only in ivanka, by the way, kimberly, but very disappeared disappointed with jared. I think a lot of those folks wait a second, if you look back at history and say people who are with the good guys or with the bad guys, stand up and be counted and what ivanka has done, and i dont get your logic at all. Chelsea was a child when bill clinton was engaged in his sexual misconduct. Chelsea clinton was not in the white house as an official working for her father. Jared kushner it this is an unfair comparison between chelsea and ivanka and doesnt make sense to me. The idea that people like ivanka and say to her buddies, we will talk to him and work with dad on this but nothing happens, and a lot of people including misses clinton had a right to say you are just making excuses and a cover for what donald trump is doing. What has he done . He did something compassionate with daca and is doing great on the hurricane. Compassionate with daca . I dont think you understand the trepidation. It is a fact. He is willing to and the program and deport them. When ivanka was upset about the children being murdered in genocide in syria and talk to her father to hit back should they do not want to give credit for anything and also the hypocrisy that she wants chelsea untouched and is not fair game but when making attack against ivanka who is accomplished. Chelsea, as an adult, has chosen to become political. That is absolutely what i was talking about. To you remember the speech, the worst speech ever. Oh, my god. She tried to be nice. The other thing i wanted to say is what americans like to do for families that are famous is to get into the Family Dynamics and think about the psychology like you understand what it is like in that relationship and remember when president bush was president , 43, we would get calls that 41 must be disappointed or trying to live up to his dads expectations or his mom wanted him to run and all these things i knew were not true, but you could not stop it and what the trumps have accepted is this chatter will be out there and think they handle it well and do not talk about it outside of their family. Going live to the campus of uc berkeley with new concerns of politically charged violence with a conservative columnist talking oncampus. That story next. Stay with us. Y tensions are high again at the university of california berkeley with officials taking unprecedented security measures to deal with protesters funds upset that ben shapiro is speaking there at the birthplace of the Free Speech Movement with liberals protesting shapiro, a mainstream conservative not particularly known for being controversial. We are in berkeley tonight. Hi, jesse with the crowd building amid a heavy Police Presence hearing from a number of speakers. They are here revving up the crowd. A couple people were arrested because their signs were not in compliance with city policy and were too big. That is the most egregious behavior we have seen with School Officials spending time in 600,000 to make sure t onights event is safe calling in officers from all 10 uc campuses aware ben shapiro is set to speak and about half an hour and will confront anyone wearing a mask if they refuse to take it off. Those have caused problems with suit several events in the past and are taking no chances closing early with businesses and protecting their property with security gates. Police can also use pepper spray if the crowds get out of pain. School Officials Say these measures are needed for s ecurity. Berkeley is hardly a beacon of free speech if this is what it takes to host a one conservative speaker here on campus and will see if it i